As in classical physics, also in quantum mechanics: physical processes are bound to obey conservation laws. However, there is an important difference. While in classical physics we can suppose that all variables have definite values (irrespective of whether we know them or not), quantum mechanics allows them to be intrinsically uncertain. In those cases conservation laws apply only to ensemble averages (expectation values), and hence are less informative. They show their full strength in measurement processes. Then the measured values satisfy the respective conservation laws in any individual experiment. Let me remind you of spin measurements on a system of two spin-½ particles, being in a state with zero total spin, which we used in Section 5.5 to illustrate the EPR paradox. The spin components, with respect to an arbitrarily chosen direction, of the two particles are indefinite; however, measuring them yields definite values (+½ or −½) that add up to zero, thus confirming the angular conservation law. In the following, we will consider some realistic experiments for which conservation laws provide a simple explanation. Energy and momentum conservation For an understanding of the interaction between matter and radiation, Einstein's photon concept (actually, he spoke of ‘light quanta’) proved to be very helpful. He assumed photons to be particle-like constituents of electromagnetic radiation, in particular light. They have the energy h ν, where ν is the frequency of the radiation field. (Since the electromagnetic spectrum extends over an extremely wide range, there is a huge number of different sorts of photons.) The crucial point is that photons are generated or annihilated only as a whole. This property gives rise to typical quantum effects.
The radiative-transfer rate for inhomogeneously broadened optical lines is calculated. Photon emission and absorption is supplemented by one- and two-phonon processes to achieve energy conservation. These photon-assisted radiative transfer processes are shown to be effective at low concentrations, where electrostatic and exchange processes are weak, in the intermediate or strong radiative trapping regime. Specific application is made to the case of dilute ruby, and explicit transfer rates are calculated. The coherence factors, which undermine nonradiative single-phonon-assisted energy transfer for a small energy mismatch, are not important for radiative transfer, if the photon mean free path is longer than the wavelength of the energy matching phonon. The one-phonon process is found to vary linearly with temperature, and to be independent of the energy mismatch. However, the calculated rate for the case of ruby is found to be very slow. The two-phonon-assisted radiative-transfer process rates are calculated. They dominate the one-phonon-assisted rate for all reasonable temperatures. The results of an earlier paper are shown to be related to phonon-assisted radiative transfer if one replaces the exchange coupling between transfer sites
J by $\ensuremath{\sim}\frac{{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}^{\ensuremath{-}1}\ensuremath{\hbar}}{(\frac{{r}_{0}}{\ensuremath{\lambda}})}$. Here ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ is the radiative lifetime,
r0 the distance between sites, and $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ the photon wavelength involved in the radiative transfer. This replacement results in a line center to wing transfer rate equal to 1.1 \ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}
102 ${e}^{\ensuremath{-}\frac{42}{T}}$ ${\mathrm{sec}}^{\ensuremath{-}1}$ for ruby (independent of concentration for a photon mean free path smaller than the sample size).