Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Operational foundation of quantum logic

Peter Mittelstaedt, Ernst-Walther Stachow

Published Sep 1, 1974• 8 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00708541

Related papers

Foundations of Quantum Logic

Andrei Galiautdinov

•Jan 1, 2017•0 citations

A phenomenological foundation of quantum logic

G. Fáy

Acta Physica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae•Jun 1, 1970•4 citations

Classical foundations of quantum logic

Claudio Garola

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1991•29 citations

The dynamic turn in quantum logic

Alexandru Baltag, Sonja Smets

In this paper we show how ideas coming from two areas of research in logic can reinforce each other. The first such line of inquiry concerns the “dynamic turn” in logic and especially the formalisms inspired by Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL); while the second line concerns research into the logical foundations of Quantum Physics, and in particular the area known as Operational Quantum Logic, as developed by Jauch and Piron (Helve Phys Acta 42:842–848, 1969 ), Piron (Foundations of Quantum Physics, 1976 ). By bringing these areas together we explain the basic ingredients of Dynamic Quantum Logic, a new direction of research in the logical foundations of physics.

Synthese•Jun 6, 2011•32 citations

Quantum logic and operational quantum mechanics

Maria Cristina Abbati, Alessandro Manià

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Jun 1, 1984•4 citations

FROM INTUITIONISTIC LOGIC TO DYNAMIC OPERATIONAL QUANTUM LOGIC

Sonja Smets

Research within the operational approach to the logical foundations of physics has recently pointed out a new perspective in which quantum logic can be viewed as an intuitionistic logic with an additional operator to capture its essential, i.e., non-distributive, properties. In this paper we will offer an introduction to this approach. We will focus further on why quantum logic has an inherent dynamic nature which is captured in the meaning of “orthomodularity” and on how it motivates physically the introduction of dynamic implication operators, each for which a deduction theorem holds with respect to a dynamic conjunction. As such we can offer a positive answer to the many who pondered about whether quantum logic should really be called a logic. Doubts to answer the question positively were in first instance due to the former lack of an implication connective which satisfies the deduction theorem within quantum logic.

BRILL eBooks•Jan 1, 2007•7 citations
In this paper we show how ideas coming from two areas of research in logic can reinforce each other. The first such line of inquiry concerns the “dynamic turn” in logic and especially the formalisms inspired by Propositional Dynamic Logic (PDL); while the second line concerns research into the logical foundations of Quantum Physics, and in particular the area known as Operational Quantum Logic, as developed by Jauch and Piron (Helve Phys Acta 42:842–848, 1969 ), Piron (Foundations of Quantum Physics, 1976 ). By bringing these areas together we explain the basic ingredients of Dynamic Quantum Logic, a new direction of research in the logical foundations of physics.
Research within the operational approach to the logical foundations of physics has recently pointed out a new perspective in which quantum logic can be viewed as an intuitionistic logic with an additional operator to capture its essential, i.e., non-distributive, properties. In this paper we will offer an introduction to this approach. We will focus further on why quantum logic has an inherent dynamic nature which is captured in the meaning of “orthomodularity” and on how it motivates physically the introduction of dynamic implication operators, each for which a deduction theorem holds with respect to a dynamic conjunction. As such we can offer a positive answer to the many who pondered about whether quantum logic should really be called a logic. Doubts to answer the question positively were in first instance due to the former lack of an implication connective which satisfies the deduction theorem within quantum logic.