Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Rutherford scattering in two dimensions

G. Barton

Published May 1, 1983• 39 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Parabolic coordinates allow Schrödinger’s equation to be solved analytically for a particle confined to the xy plane and incident with velocity v on a potential C/r. In sharp contrast to the three-dimensional case, the cross section assumes its classical value only in the rationally foreseeable classical regime ‖C‖/ℏv≫1, but not otherwise; and in this low-velocity regime the enhancement factor (probability density at the origin) for an attractive potential tends to 2 (independently of the value of ‖C‖), instead of diverging as in three dimensions like some inverse power of v.

DOI
10.1119/1.13228

Related papers

Do attractive scattering potentials concentrate particles at the origin in one, two and three dimensions? II. Potentials diverging as — C/rq

G. Barton

Abstract In classical mechanics (c.m.), and near the semi-classical limit h→0 of quantum mechanics (s.c.l.), the enhancement factors α ≡ ρ0/ρ∞ are found for scattering by attractive central potentials U(r); here ρ0,∞ (and v0,∞) are the particle densities (and speeds) at the origin and far upstream in the incident beam. For finite potentials (U(0) > — ∞), and when there are no turning points, the preceding paper found both in c.m., and near the s.c.l. (which then covers high v∞ ), α1 = v∞/v0, α2 = 1, α3 = v0/v∞ respectively in one dimension (1D), 2D and 3D. The argument is now extended to potentials (still without turning points), where U(r→0) ~ ─ C/rq, with 0 < q < 1 in ID (where r ≡ |x|), and 0 < q < 2 in 2D and 3D, since only for such q can classical trajectories and quantum wavefunctions be defined unambiguously. In c.m., α1(c.m.) = 0, α3(c.m.) = ∞, and α2(c.m.) = (1 —½q) N, where N = [integer part of (1 ─½q)-1]is the number of trajectories through any point (r, θ) in the limit r → 0. All features of U(r) other than q are irrelevant. Near the s.c.l. (which now covers low v∞) a somewhat delicate analysis is needed, matching exact zero-energy solutions at small r to the ordinary W.K.B. approximation at large r; for small v∞/u it yields the leading terms α1(s.c.l.) = Λ1(q)v∞/u, α2(s.c.I) = (1 ─½q)-1, α3(s.c.l.)= Λ3(q)u/v∞, where u ≡ (C/hqm1-q)1/(2-q) is a generalized Bohr velocity. Here Λ1,3 are functions of q alone, given in the text; as q →0 the α (s.c.l.) agree with the α quoted above for finite potentials. Even in the limit h = 0, α2 (s.c.l.) and α2 (c.m.) differ. This paradox in 2D is interpreted loosely in terms of quantal interference between the amplitudes corresponding to the N classical trajectories. The Coulomb potential ─ C/r is used as an analytically soluble example in 2D as well as in 3D. Finally, if U(r) away from the origin depends on some intrinsic range parameter α(e.g. U = ─ Cexp (─r/a)/rq), and if, near the s.c.l., v∞/u is regarded as a function not of h but more realistically of v∞, then the expressions α (s.c.l.) above apply only in an intermediate range 1/a ≪ mv∞/h ≪ (mC/h2)1/(2-q) which exists only if a ≫ (h2/mC)1/(2-q)).

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Aug 8, 1983•2 citations

Quantum scattering of the wave-packet confined in anisotropic paraboloidal shell potential

Philip Jordan D. Blancas, Eric A. Galapon

The differential scattering cross sections of the wave-packet incident to the convex and concave paraboiloidal shells, each of which has an anisotropic factor, are calculated by solving the Schrodinger equation in paraboloidal coordinate system.

Proceedings of the Samahang Pisika ng Pilipinas•Oct 22, 2012•0 citations

Do attractive scattering potentials concentrate particles at the origin in one, two and three dimensions? III. High energies in quantum mechanics

G. Barton

Abstract The enhancement factor αD ≡ 1+ δαD is defined (in D dimensions) as the ratio of the particle density at the origin to the density far upstream in the incident beam. At high incident momentum p (and for regular potentials) the first Born approximation is known to be adequate in 3D and 1D, and is assumed to be adequate also in 2D; it entails δα1 = ─δα3 if U(r) in 3D equals U(x) in 1D when r = x. For central potentials U(r) with U(0) finite, previous work implies δα3 ~ ─δα1 ~ ─mU(0)/p2, and δα2 = 0 to the same order h°. It is shown that if U(r→0) ~ U(0) + rU'(0) + ..., then δα2 ~ (2mU'(0)h/p3)(π/16), the value of U(0) being irrelevant. IfU(r→0) ~ ─C/rq, with 0 < q < 2, then δα3 ~ ─δα1 ~ (2mC/hqp2-q) π½Γ(1-½ q)/2Γ(½+½q); and, with -1 < q < 2, δα2 ~ (2mC/hqp2-q)π½Γ2(1-½q)/2Γ(½q)Γ(3/2-½q). The only mathematics needed in 3D and 1D is the standard asymptotic estimation of Fourier integrals; but in 2D one needs to develop corresponding methods for integrals where the sine or cosine has been replaced by a product J0Y0 of two Bessel functions.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Aug 8, 1983•8 citations

Scattering by a Coulomb field in two dimensions

Qiong-Gui Lin

The scattering cross section in a Coulomb field in two dimensions is obtained by solving the Schrödinger equation in parabolic coordinates. In contrast with the three-dimensional case, the result is different from the corresponding classical one and does not coincide with the Born approximation in general. The quantum-mechanical cross section depends on ℏ and reduces to the classical one in the limit ℏ→0.

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1997•18 citations

The Schrödinger Equation in Three–Dimensions

Şaki̇r Erkoç

Consider an isolated two–body system (see Figure 7.1 ). The Hamiltonian representing the system is

CRC Press eBooks•Jul 28, 2006•0 citations

Exactly solvable three–dimensional scattering problem

Cornel Eftimiu

Schrödinger’s equation is solved exactly for a potential vanishing outside a prolate spheroid. The potential is then reconstructed from the first Born approximation for the scattering amplitude.

American Journal of Physics•Aug 1, 1983•1 citation
Parabolic coordinates allow Schrödinger’s equation to be solved analytically for a particle confined to the xy plane and incident with velocity v on a potential C/r. In sharp contrast to the three-dimensional case, the cross section assumes its classical value only in the rationally foreseeable classical regime ‖C‖/ℏv≫1, but not otherwise; and in this low-velocity regime the enhancement factor (probability density at the origin) for an attractive potential tends to 2 (independently of the value of ‖C‖), instead of diverging as in three dimensions like some inverse power of v.
Abstract In classical mechanics (c.m.), and near the semi-classical limit h→0 of quantum mechanics (s.c.l.), the enhancement factors α ≡ ρ0/ρ∞ are found for scattering by attractive central potentials U(r); here ρ0,∞ (and v0,∞) are the particle densities (and speeds) at the origin and far upstream in the incident beam. For finite potentials (U(0) > — ∞), and when there are no turning points, the preceding paper found both in c.m., and near the s.c.l. (which then covers high v∞ ), α1 = v∞/v0, α2 = 1, α3 = v0/v∞ respectively in one dimension (1D), 2D and 3D. The argument is now extended to potentials (still without turning points), where U(r→0) ~ ─ C/rq, with 0 < q < 1 in ID (where r ≡ |x|), and 0 < q < 2 in 2D and 3D, since only for such q can classical trajectories and quantum wavefunctions be defined unambiguously. In c.m., α1(c.m.) = 0, α3(c.m.) = ∞, and α2(c.m.) = (1 —½q) N, where N = [integer part of (1 ─½q)-1]is the number of trajectories through any point (r, θ) in the limit r → 0. All features of U(r) other than q are irrelevant. Near the s.c.l. (which now covers low v∞) a somewhat delicate analysis is needed, matching exact zero-energy solutions at small r to the ordinary W.K.B. approximation at large r; for small v∞/u it yields the leading terms α1(s.c.l.) = Λ1(q)v∞/u, α2(s.c.I) = (1 ─½q)-1, α3(s.c.l.)= Λ3(q)u/v∞, where u ≡ (C/hqm1-q)1/(2-q) is a generalized Bohr velocity. Here Λ1,3 are functions of q alone, given in the text; as q →0 the α (s.c.l.) agree with the α quoted above for finite potentials. Even in the limit h = 0, α2 (s.c.l.) and α2 (c.m.) differ. This paradox in 2D is interpreted loosely in terms of quantal interference between the amplitudes corresponding to the N classical trajectories. The Coulomb potential ─ C/r is used as an analytically soluble example in 2D as well as in 3D. Finally, if U(r) away from the origin depends on some intrinsic range parameter α(e.g. U = ─ Cexp (─r/a)/rq), and if, near the s.c.l., v∞/u is regarded as a function not of h but more realistically of v∞, then the expressions α (s.c.l.) above apply only in an intermediate range 1/a ≪ mv∞/h ≪ (mC/h2)1/(2-q) which exists only if a ≫ (h2/mC)1/(2-q)).
Abstract The enhancement factor αD ≡ 1+ δαD is defined (in D dimensions) as the ratio of the particle density at the origin to the density far upstream in the incident beam. At high incident momentum p (and for regular potentials) the first Born approximation is known to be adequate in 3D and 1D, and is assumed to be adequate also in 2D; it entails δα1 = ─δα3 if U(r) in 3D equals U(x) in 1D when r = x. For central potentials U(r) with U(0) finite, previous work implies δα3 ~ ─δα1 ~ ─mU(0)/p2, and δα2 = 0 to the same order h°. It is shown that if U(r→0) ~ U(0) + rU'(0) + ..., then δα2 ~ (2mU'(0)h/p3)(π/16), the value of U(0) being irrelevant. IfU(r→0) ~ ─C/rq, with 0 < q < 2, then δα3 ~ ─δα1 ~ (2mC/hqp2-q) π½Γ(1-½ q)/2Γ(½+½q); and, with -1 < q < 2, δα2 ~ (2mC/hqp2-q)π½Γ2(1-½q)/2Γ(½q)Γ(3/2-½q). The only mathematics needed in 3D and 1D is the standard asymptotic estimation of Fourier integrals; but in 2D one needs to develop corresponding methods for integrals where the sine or cosine has been replaced by a product J0Y0 of two Bessel functions.