Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nuclear Physics A

Particle-hole and particle-particle RPA ground state correlations

P.J. Ellis

Published Jun 1, 1987• 17 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/0375-9474(87)90524-0

Related papers

RPA equations for 2-particle-1-hole states

Peter Schuck, Felix M. H. Villars, Peter A. Ring

Nuclear Physics A•Jul 1, 1973•48 citations

Particle-particle and hole-hole RPA correlations at finite temperature and the temperature dependence of the level density parameter

N. Vinh Mau

Nuclear Physics A•Jan 1, 1989•8 citations

RPA ground state correlations from perturbation theory

P.J. Ellis

Nuclear Physics A•Oct 1, 1970•30 citations

RPA-like calculations within limited particle–hole spaces

Michelangelo Sambataro

Nuclear Physics A•Jan 30, 2003•0 citations

Extended RPA with ground-state correlations

M. Tohyama, S. Takahara, Peter Schuck

arXiv:nucl-th/0311016•The European Physical Journal A•Aug 1, 2004•11 citations

Self-consistent extension of random-phase approximation enlarged beyond particle-hole configurations

D. Gambacurta, F. Catara, M. Grasso

We present a new extension of the random-phase approximation method: the quasiboson approximation is avoided and correlations are included in the ground state without resorting to renormalized operators or renormalized matrix elements; the configuration space is enlarged by considering also elementary excitations corresponding to the annihilation of a particle (hole) and the creation of another particle (hole) on the correlated ground state, together with the particle-hole ones. Two new and relevant advantages of this method with respect to the existing extensions of random-phase approximation are highlighted: (i) the energy weighted sum rules are completely satisfied; (ii) the problem of the existence of nonphysical states in the spectrum, related to the inclusion of particle-particle and hole-hole configurations, is solved: a way to unambiguously disentangle physical from nonphysical states in the excitation spectrum is presented. The method is applied here to a three-level Lipkin model where its quality can be judged by comparing with the exact results. Both advantages (i) and (ii) shall lead to feasible future applications of this extended RPA to several realistic cases.

Physical Review C•Jul 6, 2009•10 citations
We present a new extension of the random-phase approximation method: the quasiboson approximation is avoided and correlations are included in the ground state without resorting to renormalized operators or renormalized matrix elements; the configuration space is enlarged by considering also elementary excitations corresponding to the annihilation of a particle (hole) and the creation of another particle (hole) on the correlated ground state, together with the particle-hole ones. Two new and relevant advantages of this method with respect to the existing extensions of random-phase approximation are highlighted: (i) the energy weighted sum rules are completely satisfied; (ii) the problem of the existence of nonphysical states in the spectrum, related to the inclusion of particle-particle and hole-hole configurations, is solved: a way to unambiguously disentangle physical from nonphysical states in the excitation spectrum is presented. The method is applied here to a three-level Lipkin model where its quality can be judged by comparing with the exact results. Both advantages (i) and (ii) shall lead to feasible future applications of this extended RPA to several realistic cases.