Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Temporal Non-locality

Thomas Filk A

Published Jul 5, 2012• 22 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s10701-012-9671-7

Related papers

Temporal Non-Locality: Fact or Fiction?

Günter Mahler A

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Delayed-choice Measurement and Temporal Nonlocality

Ilki Kim, Günter Mahler A

Abstract We study for a composite quantum system with a quantum Turing architecture the temporal non-locality of quantum mechanics by using the temporal Bell inequality, which will be derived for a discretized network dynamics by identifying the subsystem indices with (discrete) parameter time. However, the direct “observation” of the quantum system will lead to no violation of the temporal Bell inequality and to consistent histories of any subsystem. Its violation can be demonstrated, though, for a delayedchoice measurement

arXiv:quant-ph/0105136•Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Feb 1, 2001•3 citations

Non-locality

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 1, 2025•0 citations

Mechanics of Emergent Non-Locality: Redefining Spatial Dimensions as Projections of a Temporal-Informational

SALMAN ABDULRAHMAN ALNESAIRI

This research paper introduces a new conceptual framework in theoretical physics, exploring emergent non-locality and redefining 3D spatial dimensions as sensory projections of a deeper temporal-informational matrix

•Jun 7, 2026•0 citations

Temporal nonlocality from indefinite causal orders

Laurie Letertre

A temporal counterpart to Bell nonlocality would intuitively refer to the presence of non-classical correlations between timelike-separated events. The hypothesis of temporal nonlocality has received recent support in the literature, and its existence would likely influence the future development of physical theories. This paper shows how Adlam's principle of temporal locality can be violated within a protocol involving indefinite causal orders. While the derivations of Leggett-Garg inequalities or the temporal CHSH inequality are said to involve problematic assumptions preventing a targeted probing of a well-defined notion of temporal nonlocality, the present test is free from such worries. However, it is shown that the test, in its current formulation, fails to be fully model-independent. We provide several considerations regarding the physicality of ICOs that could help alleviate this drawback. In the present work, a specific physical interpretation of ICOs in terms of retrocausal influences would explain the presence of temporally nonlocal correlations. It is argued that, as the physical underpinnings of temporal nonlocality might also account for standard Bell nonlocality, focusing on the former as a consequence of ICOs might support under-explored strategies to make sense of the latter.

arXiv:2501.12870•The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Jan 22, 2025•2 citations

Non-locality Reconsidered

Palgrave Macmillan eBooks•Nov 7, 2014•0 citations
Abstract We study for a composite quantum system with a quantum Turing architecture the temporal non-locality of quantum mechanics by using the temporal Bell inequality, which will be derived for a discretized network dynamics by identifying the subsystem indices with (discrete) parameter time. However, the direct “observation” of the quantum system will lead to no violation of the temporal Bell inequality and to consistent histories of any subsystem. Its violation can be demonstrated, though, for a delayedchoice measurement
A temporal counterpart to Bell nonlocality would intuitively refer to the presence of non-classical correlations between timelike-separated events. The hypothesis of temporal nonlocality has received recent support in the literature, and its existence would likely influence the future development of physical theories. This paper shows how Adlam's principle of temporal locality can be violated within a protocol involving indefinite causal orders. While the derivations of Leggett-Garg inequalities or the temporal CHSH inequality are said to involve problematic assumptions preventing a targeted probing of a well-defined notion of temporal nonlocality, the present test is free from such worries. However, it is shown that the test, in its current formulation, fails to be fully model-independent. We provide several considerations regarding the physicality of ICOs that could help alleviate this drawback. In the present work, a specific physical interpretation of ICOs in terms of retrocausal influences would explain the presence of temporally nonlocal correlations. It is argued that, as the physical underpinnings of temporal nonlocality might also account for standard Bell nonlocality, focusing on the former as a consequence of ICOs might support under-explored strategies to make sense of the latter.