Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Quantum beats of light polarization and condition of complete positivity

A. Yu. Artem’ev

Published Apr 1, 1991• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf01016573

Related papers

Quantum beats of polarization of light induced by anisotropic collisions

V. N. Rebane, T. K. Rebane

Optics and Spectroscopy•Apr 1, 1989•0 citations

Quantum beats of light polarizations induced by anisotropic relaxation: A system with angular momentum 3/2

A. Yu. Artem’ev

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1999•2 citations

Dependence of light polarization quantum beats induced by anisotropic relaxation on the symmetry group of the environment

A. Yu. Artem’ev, O. I. Fisun

Optics and Spectroscopy•Jul 1, 1991•0 citations

Ultrafast time-resolved quantum beats in the polarization state of coherent emission from quantum wells

Arthur L. Smirl, X. Chen, Osvaldo Buccafusca

Dual-channel spectral interferometry is used to measure the ellipticity, the orientation of the polarization ellipse, and the sense of rotation of the four-wave-mixing signal from a GaAs-AlGaAs multiple quantum well. Each parameter is observed to oscillate dramatically at the heavy-hole-light-hole quantum beat frequency. During each beat period (in the strong quantum beat regime), the ellipticity oscillates twice between linear and almost-circular polarization, the orientation of the polarization ellipse rotates through a complete 180 degrees , and the sense of rotation changes from left- to right-circular polarization.

Optics Letters•Jul 15, 1998•20 citations

Excitation-Induced Phase Shifts of Heavy and Light Hole Quantum Beats in Multiple Quantum Wells

Wei E. I. Sha, A. E. Paul, Shekhar Patkar +1 more

In recent years, transient four-wave mixing (FWM) techniques have been used to investigate the dephasing times of non-equilibrium carriers in semiconductor heterostructures by monitoring the decay of the macroscopic polarization. Initially, this decay was measured by temporally-integrating the scattered FWM signal as a function of time delay between two (or more) pump pulses. More recently, the macroscopic polarization decay has been measured by time-resolving the FWM signal by cross correlating it with an ultrashort laser pulse via frequency up-conversion in a nonlinear crystal. When excitons with slightly different energies are excited, oscillations (or beats) have been observed both in the time-integrated FWM signal and in the time-resolved FWM signal. Such beats have been observed, for example, between light- and heavy-hole excitons and between excitons in wells of different widths. Both the spectral behavior1 of the time-integrated FWM signal and the temporal behavior2 of the time-resolved signal have been shown to allow the distinction between the polarization interference associated with two independent oscillators and the quantum beats associated with two coupled oscillators which share a common level. In addition, it has been demonstrated3 that the quantum beats produced by incident pulses with parallel polarizations are exactly out of phase (by π) with the beats produced by orthogonally polarized pulses. In each case1-3, the period and phase of the beats and the polarization of FWM signal were explained by using a six-level model, which excluded many-body effects, to describe the J=1/2 conduction and J=3/2 valence states. Within the last few months, however, it has been shown that a complete description of the polarization selection rules for the FWM signal requires excitation-induced dephasing4 or disorder-induced coupling of the σ + and σ – excitonic transitions5.

International Conference on Ultrafast Phenomena•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

Quantum phase-space description of light polarization

A. B. Klimov, J. Delgado, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto

arXiv:quant-ph/0505135•Optics Communications•Aug 20, 2005•12 citations
Dual-channel spectral interferometry is used to measure the ellipticity, the orientation of the polarization ellipse, and the sense of rotation of the four-wave-mixing signal from a GaAs-AlGaAs multiple quantum well. Each parameter is observed to oscillate dramatically at the heavy-hole-light-hole quantum beat frequency. During each beat period (in the strong quantum beat regime), the ellipticity oscillates twice between linear and almost-circular polarization, the orientation of the polarization ellipse rotates through a complete 180 degrees , and the sense of rotation changes from left- to right-circular polarization.
In recent years, transient four-wave mixing (FWM) techniques have been used to investigate the dephasing times of non-equilibrium carriers in semiconductor heterostructures by monitoring the decay of the macroscopic polarization. Initially, this decay was measured by temporally-integrating the scattered FWM signal as a function of time delay between two (or more) pump pulses. More recently, the macroscopic polarization decay has been measured by time-resolving the FWM signal by cross correlating it with an ultrashort laser pulse via frequency up-conversion in a nonlinear crystal. When excitons with slightly different energies are excited, oscillations (or beats) have been observed both in the time-integrated FWM signal and in the time-resolved FWM signal. Such beats have been observed, for example, between light- and heavy-hole excitons and between excitons in wells of different widths. Both the spectral behavior1 of the time-integrated FWM signal and the temporal behavior2 of the time-resolved signal have been shown to allow the distinction between the polarization interference associated with two independent oscillators and the quantum beats associated with two coupled oscillators which share a common level. In addition, it has been demonstrated3 that the quantum beats produced by incident pulses with parallel polarizations are exactly out of phase (by π) with the beats produced by orthogonally polarized pulses. In each case1-3, the period and phase of the beats and the polarization of FWM signal were explained by using a six-level model, which excluded many-body effects, to describe the J=1/2 conduction and J=3/2 valence states. Within the last few months, however, it has been shown that a complete description of the polarization selection rules for the FWM signal requires excitation-induced dephasing4 or disorder-induced coupling of the σ + and σ – excitonic transitions5.