Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Canonical Transformations in Quantum Mechanics

Arnold D. Levine

Published Sep 1, 1965• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

A review of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics is outlined with a view toward their use in the solution of specific problems. Several typical problems are worked out by the method of canonical transformations to emphasize the utility of this approach. In this way one may obtain an insight into the nature and limitation of the connection that exists between the canonical transformations of classical mechanics and the unitary transformations of quantum mechanics. The purpose of this paper is to achieve certain expository and pedagogical objectives, and no original contribution to the theory is intended.

DOI
10.1119/1.1972198

Related papers

Point transformations in quantum mechanics

Kurt Bernardo Wolf

First a review is presented of the definition and properties of classical and quantum canonical transformations, from the point of view of a current program on the role of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics. The groups and the corresponding infinitesimal algebras are explored. The subgroup of point transformations (i.e. canonical transformations between pairs of conjugate observables, where one of a pair is function only of one of the other pair) is of special interest since it is a group of transformations for which classical and quantum mechanics follow each other. Only the group of inhomogeneous symplectic transformations has similar characteristics. Point transformations are treated in detail and a principal series of unitary representations is constructed. (auth)

•Jan 1, 1973•3 citations

Canonical Transformations and Quantum Mechanics

M. Moshińsky

While groups of point transformations such as rotations, translations and permutations have been extensively used in quantum mechanics, we cannot say the same of the more general groups of canonical transformations. To begin with, for the latter groups we have to determine their unitary representation in appropriate spaces. But once this is achieved canonical transformations can play as important a role in quantum mechanics as point transformations. We illustrate this in relation with the harmonic oscillator in one and many dimensions and for one and many particles. We show how radial matrix elements with respect to harmonic oscillator states can be determined group theoretically both in the Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures. We discuss the application of canonical transformations to the three body nuclear problem. We briefly outline in the concluding section applications to Coulomb problems, many body systems, accidental degeneracy, and generalized integral transforms.

SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics•Sep 1, 1973•78 citations

Sequences of point transformations and linear canonical transformations in classical and quantum mechanics

F. Leyvraz, T. H. Seligman

Sequences of point transformations and canonical linear transformations are considered in classical and quantum mechanics. It is shown that the unitary representations of such transformations can be obtained, in general, in the sense that in the limit, classical behavior is retrieved. In the particular case of one point transformation combined with two linear transformations, the results found in this way are exact. A new class of differential equations is thereby solved by quadratures.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1989•18 citations

Complex Coordinates and Quantum Mechanics

Franco Strocchi

By introducing complex canonical coordinates, classical and quantum mechanics may be embedded in the same formulation. In such a way, the connection between Poisson brackets and commutators, canonical transformations and unitary transformations, etc., become apparent. This formulation is also particularly suitable for discussing the classical limit of quantum mechanics and for quantum-statistical mechanics.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 1966•190 citations

-1 On the canonical transformation in classical and quantum mechanics

L.D. Faddeev, L.A. Khalfin, I.V. Komarov

In his famous book on the principles of quantum mechanics Dirac2 formulates (in §26) the following proposition: “. . . for a quantum dynamical system that has a classical analogue, unitary transformations in the quantum theory are the analogue of contact transformations in the classical theory.” No detailed description of this analogy is, however, given in Dirac’s book. In the following we intend to investigate this analogy in more detail.

CRC Press eBooks•May 21, 2004•1 citation

Nonbijective canonical transformations and their representation in quantum mechanics

Peter Krämer, M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Mar 1, 1978•29 citations
A review of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics is outlined with a view toward their use in the solution of specific problems. Several typical problems are worked out by the method of canonical transformations to emphasize the utility of this approach. In this way one may obtain an insight into the nature and limitation of the connection that exists between the canonical transformations of classical mechanics and the unitary transformations of quantum mechanics. The purpose of this paper is to achieve certain expository and pedagogical objectives, and no original contribution to the theory is intended.
First a review is presented of the definition and properties of classical and quantum canonical transformations, from the point of view of a current program on the role of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics. The groups and the corresponding infinitesimal algebras are explored. The subgroup of point transformations (i.e. canonical transformations between pairs of conjugate observables, where one of a pair is function only of one of the other pair) is of special interest since it is a group of transformations for which classical and quantum mechanics follow each other. Only the group of inhomogeneous symplectic transformations has similar characteristics. Point transformations are treated in detail and a principal series of unitary representations is constructed. (auth)
While groups of point transformations such as rotations, translations and permutations have been extensively used in quantum mechanics, we cannot say the same of the more general groups of canonical transformations. To begin with, for the latter groups we have to determine their unitary representation in appropriate spaces. But once this is achieved canonical transformations can play as important a role in quantum mechanics as point transformations. We illustrate this in relation with the harmonic oscillator in one and many dimensions and for one and many particles. We show how radial matrix elements with respect to harmonic oscillator states can be determined group theoretically both in the Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures. We discuss the application of canonical transformations to the three body nuclear problem. We briefly outline in the concluding section applications to Coulomb problems, many body systems, accidental degeneracy, and generalized integral transforms.
In the present paper we analyze the representations in quantum mechanics of classical canonical transformations that are nonbijective, i.e., not one-to-one onto. We take as the central example the canonical transformation that changes the Hamiltonian of a one-dimensional oscillator of frequency κ−1 into one of frequency k−1 where κ, k are relatively prime integers. For the particular case k=1, the mapping of the original phase space (x,p) onto the new one (x̄, p̄) is κ to 1 and the equivalent points in (x,p) are related by a cyclic group 𝒞κ of linear canonical transformations. When formulating this problem in Bargmann Hilbert space, the canonical transformation can be related to the conformal transformation w=zκ, which again is κ to 1 and where a group 𝒞κ also appears. This cyclic group proves fundamental for the determination of representations of the conformal transformation in Bargmann Hilbert space. To begin with, it suggests that while we can take in the original Bargmann Hilbert space a single component function, in the new Bargmann Hilbert space we must take a κ component one. In this way we can map in a one-to-one fashion the states and operators in the old and new Bargmann Hilbert spaces. When translating these results to ordinary Hilbert space, we get in an unambiguous way the quantization of the observables appearing in the equations that determine the representation of the classical canonical transformation relating oscillators of frequencies κ−1 and k−1. Furthermore, we also get the solutions of these equations, and the resulting representation is unitary. While our discussion is restricted to the problem mentioned above, in the concluding section we indicate our surmise for deriving systematically the unitary representation in quantum mechanics of arbitrary canonical transformations.