Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review

Secondary Radiation and Polarization of Resonance Radiation in Cadmium

Walter A. MacNair

Published May 1, 1927• 5 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Secondary radiation in cadmium vapor containing mercury as an impurity.---Attention is called to the points of difference between the conditions under which the two types of optically excited spectra of mercury vapor appear, namely resonance radiation and fluorescence. In the present experiments it is noted that when a bulb containing cadmium with a slight impurity of mercury is illuminated by light of 2288A wave-length the secondary radiation contains the mercury line 2536.7A in addition to the cadmium lines 2288A and 3261A provided the metal is distilling. As soon as the vapor is stagnant, however, only the cadmium 2288A line appears. The suggestion is made that the phenomenon is due to the presence in the distilling vapor of unstable HgCd molecules. In such a molecule the Cd atom may absorb the 2288A radiation and subsequently in the breakdown of the molecule may excite the Hg atom by a collision of the second kind.Polarization of the cadmium resonance, radiation in zero magnetic field.---The polarization of the cadmium resonance radiation (3261A) in zero magnetic field under certain conditions was found to be 35 percent. In order to explain this value by the kinetic theory, one must assign effective radii to the colliding atoms which are thirty times the radii effective in ordinary collisions.

DOI
10.1103/physrev.29.677

Related papers

SELECTIVE REFLECTION FROM MERCURY AND CADMIUM VAPORS

H. L. Welsh, Jacob Kastner, A. C. Lauriston

Selective reflection from mercury and cadmium vapors in the neighborhood of the resonance lines was investigated quantitatively using incident light of continuous spectral distribution. For a given experimental arrangement the lowest vapor density (atoms per cubic centimeter) at which selective reflection could be detected at Hg 2537 Å, Cd 2288 Å, and Cd 3261 Å was inversely proportional to the oscillator strength (f-value) of the absorption line. Contours of the selective reflection of the Hg 2537 Å and Cd 2288 Å lines were obtained over a large range of vapor densities up to 80 × 1018 atoms per cc. At this density the cadmium reflection extended over several thousand cm.−1 compared to about a hundred cm.−1 for mercury. The general features of the reflection contours can be explained by the theory of reflection from an absorbing medium. Fitting a theoretical curve to the experimental reflection contour yields values of the oscillator strength and the damping constant. For Hg 2537 Å and Cd 2288 Å the f-values are 0.0268 and 1.40 respectively, in good agreement with those found by other methods. The damping constant, γ, varies as the square root of the number of atoms per cubic centimeter, indicating that the mechanism of selective reflection is not the same as that for absorption and emission. An empirical areal law for selective reflection confirms the relationship [Formula: see text]. A shift of the resonance frequency of the order of magnitude of the coupling shift calculated by Weisskopf was observed for Hg 2537 Å. Deviations from theory at both high and low pressures were observed for Cd 2288 Å. The low pressure deviation takes the form of a line of residual intensity at the resonance frequency, which may be due to a different kind of selective reflection.

Canadian Journal of Research•Mar 1, 1950•12 citations

Polarized Resonance Radiation in Weak Magnetic Fields

Robert Williams Wood, A. Ellett

Effect of a magnetic field on the polarization of resonance radiation of mercury and of sodium.---(1) Mercury $\ensuremath{\lambda}2536$. A beam of plane polarized monochromatic light was focussed on the bulb containing the vapor at low pressure (0\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C), and the polarization of the resonance radiation was determined photographically with the aid of a quartz wedge and a double image quartz prism. If the exciting beam is going east with the electric vector vertical, when the earth's field is carefully neutralized the polarization is 90 per cent in any horizontal direction and zero vertically; a field of only 2 gauss directed north reduces the polarization in its direction to nearly zero (the decrease with increasing field being exponential), changes the polarization east and also up to 60 percent, and increases the intensity directed upwards threefold. Similar effects are produced by fields in other directions. The polarization with zero field does not approach 100 per cent at low pressures, since 90 per cent was found also with the vapor at -50\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C, when the radiation first appeared. It was thought that the high value might be due to an orientation of the resonating atom by the field of the exciting light, but a beam of concentrated sunlight produced no effect. As found by Malinowski, a strong field of 10,000 gauss merely increased the intensity of the radiation about 10 per cent. This added light was found to be unpolarized. (2) Sodium $D$ line. In the case of sodium vapor the tube was heated to 185\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C, the observations were visual, and as a source of unreversed light, the glow on the surface of a sodium glass vacuum tube carrying a discharge, was used. The effects observed are similar to those for mercury, but differ for some directions; fields forty times stronger were required, and the polarization in zero field was only 6 per cent, probably due to traces of hydrogen. This was increased by the field in some directions to 30 per cent.Effect of magnetic field on fluorescent light of iodine vapor and on white scattered light from mercury and ether vapors.---The polarization was found not to be affected.

Physical Review•Sep 1, 1924•74 citations

Depolarization of Resonance Radiation

Paul D. Foote

Depolarization and quenching of mercury resonance radiation are phenomena of quite different type. Depolarization is produced by two effects. With gases which quench by effecting the transition $^{3}P_{1}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}^{3}P_{0}$ upon collision with Hg\ensuremath{'} atoms, there exists a pronounced reverse transition $^{3}P_{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}^{3}P_{1}$ produced by collision with high speed molecules. Atoms which radiate without any collision emit polarized light under the conditions of the experiment. Those which become $^{3}P_{1}$ atoms after having existed as $^{3}P_{0}$ atoms have experienced a large number of collisions and have lost their orientation relative to the incident electric vector; accordingly they emit radiation polarized in random directions. The second depolarizing influence arises in collisions at distances exceeding the ordinary kinetic theory collision such as is described above, at which the distance is too great for a collision of the first or second type, but still small enough for the field of the gas atom to exert a perturbing influence on the orientation of the Hg\ensuremath{'} atom. Depolarization by ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}$ is an excellent example of the second influence while the first effect is sufficient to interpret the experimental data with the rare gases, the atomic fields of which decrease with a high power of the radial distance.

Physical Review•Sep 1, 1927•1 citation

The polarization of sensitized fluorescence

W Gough

By means of the selection rule Σ m J = constant along the axis of a collision between two atoms, it is shown that sensitized fluorescence should in some cases be partially polarized. The degree of polarization of the fluorescence of cadmium vapour sensitized by the presence of mercury vapour is calculated for certain states of polarization of the incident radiation. In the case studied experimentally the degree of polarization varies over a range of 2-5%. The theoretical value is 3/11, which is reduced in practice by various depolarizing effects. The possibility of transfer coherence between eigenstates from mercury to cadmium during a collision is considered.

Proceedings of the Physical Society•Jan 1, 1967•29 citations

On the influence of magnetic fields on the polarisation of resonance radiation

Robert Williams Wood, A. Ellett

Abstract The emission of polarised light by fluorescent sodium and iodine vapours was discovered by one of the present writers many years ago, and a similar phenomenon was looked for repeatedly, but without success, in the case of the much simpler (presumably) type of emission which occurs when a gas or vapour re-emits without change of wave-length the energy which it abstracts from the incident beam, as when the monochromatic radiation 2536 from a mercury arc traverse as exhausted quartz bulb containing a drop of mercury at room temperature, or the light of a sodium flame falls upon a glass bulb containing highly rarefied sodium vapour. Lord Rayleigh has recently discovered, however, that the resonance radiation of mercury vapour shows fairly strong polarisation, and reported results which apparently indicated that the polarisation becomes stronger as the exciting radiation penetrates to greater and greater depths of the vapour, being practically absent at the point where the radiation enters the bulb or tube. This would mean that polarisation of the light results only when the excitation is, by frequencies, a little out of tune with the natural frequency of the mercury atom, a matter of great theoretical interest. In a report of some work done last year by one of us this last observation of Lord Rayleigh was not confirmed, the polarisation appearing of full strength right up to the entrance window of the exciting beam. A possible explanation of Lord Rayleigh's results will be offered in the present paper in which it will be shown that a very weak magnetic field, properly oriented, destroys completely all traces of polarisation.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•Jun 1, 1923•48 citations

Polarization of Radiation Excited by Electron Impact

A. Ellett, Paul D. Foote, Fred L. Mohler

Polarized radiation following electron impact.---If a unidirectional beam of electrons, of velocity slightly in excess of the resonance potential, is projected through a vapor at a very low pressure so that effects due to atomic collision and resonance radiation are negligible, and in the absence of an applied field and resulting Larmor precession, there is reason to suspect that the radiation emitted perpendicular to the electron beam should be partially polarized, especially for lines corresponding to $\ensuremath{\Delta}j=1$.Polarization in mercury and sodium vapor.---Experiment showed a polarization of about 30 percent for $\ensuremath{\lambda}2537$ with the greatest intensity of the electrical vibration having a direction perpendicular to the electron beam. No polarization was detected for the unresolved sodium D-lines, confirming the recent observation of Kossel and Gerthsen.Polarization in mercury with field of 3 gauss.---A field parallel to the electron beam produced no effect. With the field perpendicular to the beam the radiation along the field was unpolarized while that perpendicular to the field was reduced in polarization to 13 percent. These results suggest that the atom radiates with the same distribution of polarization and intensity as in zero field but with the atom rotated through an angle determined by the time of excitation and the precessional velocity.

Physical Review•Jan 1, 1926•19 citations
Secondary radiation in cadmium vapor containing mercury as an impurity.---Attention is called to the points of difference between the conditions under which the two types of optically excited spectra of mercury vapor appear, namely resonance radiation and fluorescence. In the present experiments it is noted that when a bulb containing cadmium with a slight impurity of mercury is illuminated by light of 2288A wave-length the secondary radiation contains the mercury line 2536.7A in addition to the cadmium lines 2288A and 3261A provided the metal is distilling. As soon as the vapor is stagnant, however, only the cadmium 2288A line appears. The suggestion is made that the phenomenon is due to the presence in the distilling vapor of unstable HgCd molecules. In such a molecule the Cd atom may absorb the 2288A radiation and subsequently in the breakdown of the molecule may excite the Hg atom by a collision of the second kind.Polarization of the cadmium resonance, radiation in zero magnetic field.---The polarization of the cadmium resonance radiation (3261A) in zero magnetic field under certain conditions was found to be 35 percent. In order to explain this value by the kinetic theory, one must assign effective radii to the colliding atoms which are thirty times the radii effective in ordinary collisions.
Selective reflection from mercury and cadmium vapors in the neighborhood of the resonance lines was investigated quantitatively using incident light of continuous spectral distribution. For a given experimental arrangement the lowest vapor density (atoms per cubic centimeter) at which selective reflection could be detected at Hg 2537 Å, Cd 2288 Å, and Cd 3261 Å was inversely proportional to the oscillator strength (f-value) of the absorption line. Contours of the selective reflection of the Hg 2537 Å and Cd 2288 Å lines were obtained over a large range of vapor densities up to 80 × 1018 atoms per cc. At this density the cadmium reflection extended over several thousand cm.−1 compared to about a hundred cm.−1 for mercury. The general features of the reflection contours can be explained by the theory of reflection from an absorbing medium. Fitting a theoretical curve to the experimental reflection contour yields values of the oscillator strength and the damping constant. For Hg 2537 Å and Cd 2288 Å the f-values are 0.0268 and 1.40 respectively, in good agreement with those found by other methods. The damping constant, γ, varies as the square root of the number of atoms per cubic centimeter, indicating that the mechanism of selective reflection is not the same as that for absorption and emission. An empirical areal law for selective reflection confirms the relationship [Formula: see text]. A shift of the resonance frequency of the order of magnitude of the coupling shift calculated by Weisskopf was observed for Hg 2537 Å. Deviations from theory at both high and low pressures were observed for Cd 2288 Å. The low pressure deviation takes the form of a line of residual intensity at the resonance frequency, which may be due to a different kind of selective reflection.
Effect of a magnetic field on the polarization of resonance radiation of mercury and of sodium.---(1) Mercury $\ensuremath{\lambda}2536$. A beam of plane polarized monochromatic light was focussed on the bulb containing the vapor at low pressure (0\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C), and the polarization of the resonance radiation was determined photographically with the aid of a quartz wedge and a double image quartz prism. If the exciting beam is going east with the electric vector vertical, when the earth's field is carefully neutralized the polarization is 90 per cent in any horizontal direction and zero vertically; a field of only 2 gauss directed north reduces the polarization in its direction to nearly zero (the decrease with increasing field being exponential), changes the polarization east and also up to 60 percent, and increases the intensity directed upwards threefold. Similar effects are produced by fields in other directions. The polarization with zero field does not approach 100 per cent at low pressures, since 90 per cent was found also with the vapor at -50\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C, when the radiation first appeared. It was thought that the high value might be due to an orientation of the resonating atom by the field of the exciting light, but a beam of concentrated sunlight produced no effect. As found by Malinowski, a strong field of 10,000 gauss merely increased the intensity of the radiation about 10 per cent. This added light was found to be unpolarized. (2) Sodium DDD line. In the case of sodium vapor the tube was heated to 185\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}C, the observations were visual, and as a source of unreversed light, the glow on the surface of a sodium glass vacuum tube carrying a discharge, was used. The effects observed are similar to those for mercury, but differ for some directions; fields forty times stronger were required, and the polarization in zero field was only 6 per cent, probably due to traces of hydrogen. This was increased by the field in some directions to 30 per cent.Effect of magnetic field on fluorescent light of iodine vapor and on white scattered light from mercury and ether vapors.---The polarization was found not to be affected.
Depolarization and quenching of mercury resonance radiation are phenomena of quite different type. Depolarization is produced by two effects. With gases which quench by effecting the transition $^{3}P_{1}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}^{3}P_{0}$ upon collision with Hg\ensuremath{'} atoms, there exists a pronounced reverse transition $^{3}P_{0}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}^{3}P_{1}$ produced by collision with high speed molecules. Atoms which radiate without any collision emit polarized light under the conditions of the experiment. Those which become 3P1^{3}P_{1}3P1​ atoms after having existed as 3P0^{3}P_{0}3P0​ atoms have experienced a large number of collisions and have lost their orientation relative to the incident electric vector; accordingly they emit radiation polarized in random directions. The second depolarizing influence arises in collisions at distances exceeding the ordinary kinetic theory collision such as is described above, at which the distance is too great for a collision of the first or second type, but still small enough for the field of the gas atom to exert a perturbing influence on the orientation of the Hg\ensuremath{'} atom. Depolarization by H2{\mathrm{H}}_{2}H2​ is an excellent example of the second influence while the first effect is sufficient to interpret the experimental data with the rare gases, the atomic fields of which decrease with a high power of the radial distance.
By means of the selection rule Σ m J = constant along the axis of a collision between two atoms, it is shown that sensitized fluorescence should in some cases be partially polarized. The degree of polarization of the fluorescence of cadmium vapour sensitized by the presence of mercury vapour is calculated for certain states of polarization of the incident radiation. In the case studied experimentally the degree of polarization varies over a range of 2-5%. The theoretical value is 3/11, which is reduced in practice by various depolarizing effects. The possibility of transfer coherence between eigenstates from mercury to cadmium during a collision is considered.
Abstract The emission of polarised light by fluorescent sodium and iodine vapours was discovered by one of the present writers many years ago, and a similar phenomenon was looked for repeatedly, but without success, in the case of the much simpler (presumably) type of emission which occurs when a gas or vapour re-emits without change of wave-length the energy which it abstracts from the incident beam, as when the monochromatic radiation 2536 from a mercury arc traverse as exhausted quartz bulb containing a drop of mercury at room temperature, or the light of a sodium flame falls upon a glass bulb containing highly rarefied sodium vapour. Lord Rayleigh has recently discovered, however, that the resonance radiation of mercury vapour shows fairly strong polarisation, and reported results which apparently indicated that the polarisation becomes stronger as the exciting radiation penetrates to greater and greater depths of the vapour, being practically absent at the point where the radiation enters the bulb or tube. This would mean that polarisation of the light results only when the excitation is, by frequencies, a little out of tune with the natural frequency of the mercury atom, a matter of great theoretical interest. In a report of some work done last year by one of us this last observation of Lord Rayleigh was not confirmed, the polarisation appearing of full strength right up to the entrance window of the exciting beam. A possible explanation of Lord Rayleigh's results will be offered in the present paper in which it will be shown that a very weak magnetic field, properly oriented, destroys completely all traces of polarisation.
Polarized radiation following electron impact.---If a unidirectional beam of electrons, of velocity slightly in excess of the resonance potential, is projected through a vapor at a very low pressure so that effects due to atomic collision and resonance radiation are negligible, and in the absence of an applied field and resulting Larmor precession, there is reason to suspect that the radiation emitted perpendicular to the electron beam should be partially polarized, especially for lines corresponding to $\ensuremath{\Delta}j=1$.Polarization in mercury and sodium vapor.---Experiment showed a polarization of about 30 percent for $\ensuremath{\lambda}2537$ with the greatest intensity of the electrical vibration having a direction perpendicular to the electron beam. No polarization was detected for the unresolved sodium D-lines, confirming the recent observation of Kossel and Gerthsen.Polarization in mercury with field of 3 gauss.---A field parallel to the electron beam produced no effect. With the field perpendicular to the beam the radiation along the field was unpolarized while that perpendicular to the field was reduced in polarization to 13 percent. These results suggest that the atom radiates with the same distribution of polarization and intensity as in zero field but with the atom rotated through an angle determined by the time of excitation and the precessional velocity.