Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

Realization of quantum error correction

John Chiaverini, Dietrich G. Leibfried, Tobias Schaetz, M. D. Barrett, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, Wayne M. Itano, John D. Jost, Emanuel H. Knill, C. Langer, Roee Ozeri, D. J. Wineland

Published Dec 1, 2004• 517 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/nature03074

Related papers

Foundations of quantum error correction

Wen-Ching Li

AMS/IP studies in advanced mathematics•Jul 20, 2007•4 citations

QECirc: A Community-Driven, FAIR Library of Quantum Error Correction Circuits

Ludwig Schmid, Tom Peham, Robert Wille

Quantum error correction (QEC) underpins fault-tolerant quantum computing, but the circuits that realize QEC codes (encoders, logical state-preparation and gate routines, and syndrome-extraction schedules) are scattered across papers and one-off repositories in incompatible formats, often documented too sparsely to reconstruct or reuse. We present QECirc (https://qecirc.com/), a community-driven, open library that makes QEC circuits Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). Each entry links to its underlying code, ships in Stim and OpenQASM with interactive visualizations, and is checked for correctness before publication. In short, where a catalog such as the Error Correction Zoo describes the codes, QECirc provides the concrete circuits that realize them.

quant-pharXiv:2609.20182•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

Realization of long distance quantum cryptography requires quantum error correction (QEC) of the errors introduced by noise on communication channels. This chapter begins with presenting common sources of errors in QEC. For quantum information processing qubits using photons, trapped ions, superconducting circuits and spins in semiconductors have been considered. Coherent quantum errors arise due to the errors associated with system controls and/or characterization where imprecise operation on the qubit introduces inaccurate Hamiltonian dynamics. The basic principle involved in classical error correction is to increase the number of bits more than is required for a given amount of information. Digitization of quantum errors makes it possible to correct any quantum error using the ability to correct a finite set of errors. The use of stabilizer codes to describe QEC codes is highly useful. It allows for easy synthesis of correction circuits and also shows how logical operations can be performed directly on encoded data.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 5, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction and Its Application

Masahito Hayashi

Springer eBooks•Oct 31, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Error Correction: Applications and implementations

Daniel A. Lidar, Todd A. Brun

•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Adaptive Quantum Error Correction via Reinforcement Learning

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum error correction (QEC) is a crucial element in the realization of fault-tolerant quantum computation. However, traditional QEC schemes often rely on pre-determined, static parameters, which may not be optimally suited for the specific noise characteristics present in a given quantum hardware. This work introduces a novel approach to QEC that leverages reinforcement learning (RL) to dynamically adapt the error correction protocol in real-time. The system learns to optimize the parameters of the QEC code, such as measurement schedules and decoding strategies, based on continuous feedback from the quantum hardware. This adaptive approach promises to significantly improve the performance and efficiency of QEC, reducing the overhead associated with error correction and enhancing the fidelity of quantum computations. The core claim of this paper is that quantum error correction is computationally intensive and requires precise control over quantum systems. The central mechanism involves employing reinforcement learning to optimize the parameters of quantum error correction protocols in real-time, adapting to the specific noise characteristics of the quantum hardware. This represents a new automation of the QEC process.

•Sep 7, 2026•0 citations
Quantum error correction (QEC) underpins fault-tolerant quantum computing, but the circuits that realize QEC codes (encoders, logical state-preparation and gate routines, and syndrome-extraction schedules) are scattered across papers and one-off repositories in incompatible formats, often documented too sparsely to reconstruct or reuse. We present QECirc (https://qecirc.com/), a community-driven, open library that makes QEC circuits Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR). Each entry links to its underlying code, ships in Stim and OpenQASM with interactive visualizations, and is checked for correctness before publication. In short, where a catalog such as the Error Correction Zoo describes the codes, QECirc provides the concrete circuits that realize them.
Realization of long distance quantum cryptography requires quantum error correction (QEC) of the errors introduced by noise on communication channels. This chapter begins with presenting common sources of errors in QEC. For quantum information processing qubits using photons, trapped ions, superconducting circuits and spins in semiconductors have been considered. Coherent quantum errors arise due to the errors associated with system controls and/or characterization where imprecise operation on the qubit introduces inaccurate Hamiltonian dynamics. The basic principle involved in classical error correction is to increase the number of bits more than is required for a given amount of information. Digitization of quantum errors makes it possible to correct any quantum error using the ability to correct a finite set of errors. The use of stabilizer codes to describe QEC codes is highly useful. It allows for easy synthesis of correction circuits and also shows how logical operations can be performed directly on encoded data.
Quantum error correction (QEC) is a crucial element in the realization of fault-tolerant quantum computation. However, traditional QEC schemes often rely on pre-determined, static parameters, which may not be optimally suited for the specific noise characteristics present in a given quantum hardware. This work introduces a novel approach to QEC that leverages reinforcement learning (RL) to dynamically adapt the error correction protocol in real-time. The system learns to optimize the parameters of the QEC code, such as measurement schedules and decoding strategies, based on continuous feedback from the quantum hardware. This adaptive approach promises to significantly improve the performance and efficiency of QEC, reducing the overhead associated with error correction and enhancing the fidelity of quantum computations. The core claim of this paper is that quantum error correction is computationally intensive and requires precise control over quantum systems. The central mechanism involves employing reinforcement learning to optimize the parameters of quantum error correction protocols in real-time, adapting to the specific noise characteristics of the quantum hardware. This represents a new automation of the QEC process.