Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Synthesis lectures on quantum computing

Adiabatic Quantum Computation and Quantum Annealing: Theory and Practice

Catherine C. McGeoch

Published Jul 31, 2014• 149 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2200/s00585ed1v01y201407qmc008

Related papers

Adiabatic Quantum Computation and Quantum Annealing

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 15, 2020•0 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computation and Quantum Annealing

Catherine C. McGeoch

Synthesis lectures on quantum computing•Jan 1, 2014•131 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computing and Quantum Annealing

Bastien Chopard B, Marco Tomassini

Natural computing series•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Quantum annealing and adiabatic quantum computing

Charles R. Giardina

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Performance of Commercial Quantum Annealing Solvers for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem

Salvatore Sinno, Thomas Groß, Alan Mott +4 more

Quantum annealing (QA) is a heuristic search algorithm that can run on Adiabatic Quantum Computation (AQC) processors to solve combinatorial optimization problems. Although theoretical studies and simulations on classic hardware have shown encouraging results, these analyses often assume that the computation occurs in adiabatically closed systems without environmental interference. This is not a realistic assumption for real systems; therefore, without extensive empirical measurements on real quantum platforms, theory-based predictions, simulations on classical hardware or limited tests do not accurately assess the current commercial capabilities. This study has assessed the quality of the solution provided by a commercial quantum annealing platform compared to known solutions for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP). The study has conducted extensive analysis over more than 30 hours of access to QA commercial platforms to investigate how the size of the problem and its complexity impact the solution accuracy and the time used to find a solution. Our results have found that the absolute error is between 0.12 and 0.55, and the quantum processor unit (QPU) time is between 30 and 46 micro seconds. Our results show that as the constraint density increases, the quality of the solution degrades. Therefore, more than the problem size, the model complexity plays a critical role, and practical applications should select formulations that minimize the constraint density.

arXiv:2309.05564•Sep 11, 2023•2 citations

Quantum Annealing for Semantic Segmentation in Remote Sensing: Potential and Limitations

Amer Delilbasic, Bertrand Le Saux, Morris Riedel +2 more

Quantum Annealing (QA) is a powerful method for combinatorial optimization derived from adiabatic quantum computation. The development of computing devices implementing QA accelerated its adoption in practical use cases. In this paper, we summarize the main features and limitations of QA and its application to remote sensing, specifically to semantic segmentation. We provide indications for successfully applying it to real problems, and techniques for improving its performance. This overview can support practitioners in the adoption of this innovative computing technology.

IEEE Mediterranean and Middle-East Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (M2GARSS)•Apr 15, 2024•2 citations
Quantum annealing (QA) is a heuristic search algorithm that can run on Adiabatic Quantum Computation (AQC) processors to solve combinatorial optimization problems. Although theoretical studies and simulations on classic hardware have shown encouraging results, these analyses often assume that the computation occurs in adiabatically closed systems without environmental interference. This is not a realistic assumption for real systems; therefore, without extensive empirical measurements on real quantum platforms, theory-based predictions, simulations on classical hardware or limited tests do not accurately assess the current commercial capabilities. This study has assessed the quality of the solution provided by a commercial quantum annealing platform compared to known solutions for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem (CVRP). The study has conducted extensive analysis over more than 30 hours of access to QA commercial platforms to investigate how the size of the problem and its complexity impact the solution accuracy and the time used to find a solution. Our results have found that the absolute error is between 0.12 and 0.55, and the quantum processor unit (QPU) time is between 30 and 46 micro seconds. Our results show that as the constraint density increases, the quality of the solution degrades. Therefore, more than the problem size, the model complexity plays a critical role, and practical applications should select formulations that minimize the constraint density.
Quantum Annealing (QA) is a powerful method for combinatorial optimization derived from adiabatic quantum computation. The development of computing devices implementing QA accelerated its adoption in practical use cases. In this paper, we summarize the main features and limitations of QA and its application to remote sensing, specifically to semantic segmentation. We provide indications for successfully applying it to real problems, and techniques for improving its performance. This overview can support practitioners in the adoption of this innovative computing technology.