Physical Review Letters

Comment on “What is a Gauge Transformation in Quantum Mechanics?”

Nicolaas P. Landsman

Published Aug 2, 1999• 1 citation

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by Carlo Rovelli. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4613 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 11 August 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1070©1999 American Physical Society

DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.83.1070

Related papers

Comment on “Dissipative Quantum Dynamics with a Lindblad Functional”

G. W. Ford, Robert F. O’Connell

A Comment on the Letter by S. Gao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3101 (1997). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 10 July 1998DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3376©1999 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersApr 19, 199930 citations

Comment on “Quantum Mechanics in Metric Space: Wave Functions and their Densities”

Emilio Artacho

A Comment on the Letter by I. D’Amico et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 050401 (2011). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 25 February 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.188901© 2011 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersOct 27, 20115 citations

Comment on “Measurement of the Intrinsic Dissipation of a Macroscopic System in the Quantum Regime”

Siyuan Han, R. Rouse

A Comment on the Letter by C. Cosmelli, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5357 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 2 August 1999DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4191©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersApr 30, 20015 citations

Comment on “Röntgen Quantum Phase Shift: A Semiclassical Local Electrodynamical Effect?”

Gianfranco Spavieri, Miguel Rodriguez

A Comment on the Letter by S. A. R. Horsley and M. Babiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010405 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 17 August 2006DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.258901©2006 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersDec 19, 20063 citations

Comment on “Exponential Sensitivity and Chaos in Quantum Systems”

Rüdiger Schack

A Comment on the Letter by R. Blümel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 428 (1994). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 12 August 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.581©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersJul 17, 199512 citations

Comment on “Quantum Backreaction on `Classical' Variables”

K. R. W. Jones

A Comment on the Letter by Arlen Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 621 (1995). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 February 1995DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.4087©1996 American Physical Society

Physical Review LettersMay 20, 199619 citations