Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chemical Physics Letters

Comment on “On the optimal symmetric purification scheme of the one-particle density matrix” [Chem. Phys. Lett. 511 (2011) 159–160]

Emanuel H. Rubensson

Published Jan 20, 2012• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.cplett.2012.01.026

Related papers

Reply to Comment on ‘On the optimal symmetric purification scheme of the one-particle density matrix’

Jaehoon Kim, Yousung Jung

Chemical Physics Letters•Jan 17, 2012•1 citation

Comment on: “Transforms for idempotency purification of density matrices in linear-scaling electronic-structure calculations” [Chem. Phys. Lett. 340 (2001) 552–558]

Scott Habershon, Frederick R. Manby

Chemical Physics Letters•Mar 1, 2002•4 citations

Comment on: “Entanglement purification via controlled–controlled-NOT operations” [Phys. Lett. A 271 (2000) 44]

Małgorzata Okrasa, Zbigniew Walczak

Physics Letters A•Feb 2, 2008•5 citations

Notes on density matrix perturbation theory

Truflandier, LA, Dianzinga, RM, David R. Bowler

Density matrix perturbation theory (DMPT) is known as a promising alternative to the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory, in which the sum-over-states (SOS) is replaced by algorithms with perturbed density matrices as the input variables. In this article, we formulate and discuss three types of DMPT, with two of them based only on density matrices: the approach of Kussmann and Ochsenfeld [J. Chem. Phys. 127, 054103 (2007)] is reformulated via the Sylvester equation and the recursive DMPT of Niklasson and Challacombe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 193001 (2004)] is extended to the hole-particle canonical purification (HPCP) from Truflandier et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 091102 (2016)]. A comparison of the computational performances shows that the aforementioned methods outperform the standard SOS. The HPCP-DMPT demonstrates stable convergence profiles but at a higher computational cost when compared to the original recursive polynomial method.

•Oct 28, 2020•4 citations

Comment on 'Transforms for idempotency purification of density matrices in linear-scaling electronic-structure calculations'

Habershon, S, Manby, FR

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Notes on density matrix perturbation theory

Lionel A. Truflandier, Rivo M. Dianzinga, David R. Bowler

Density matrix perturbation theory (DMPT) is known as a promising alternative to the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory, in which the sum-over-states (SOS) is replaced by algorithms with perturbed density matrices as the input variables. In this article, we formulate and discuss three types of DMPT, with two of them based only on density matrices: the approach of Kussmann and Ochsenfeld [J. Chem. Phys. 127, 054103 (2007)] is reformulated via the Sylvester equation and the recursive DMPT of Niklasson and Challacombe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 193001 (2004)] is extended to the hole-particle canonical purification (HPCP) from Truflandier et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 091102 (2016)]. A comparison of the computational performances shows that the aforementioned methods outperform the standard SOS. The HPCP-DMPT demonstrates stable convergence profiles but at a higher computational cost when compared to the original recursive polynomial method.

arXiv:2007.04739•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Oct 23, 2020•5 citations
Density matrix perturbation theory (DMPT) is known as a promising alternative to the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory, in which the sum-over-states (SOS) is replaced by algorithms with perturbed density matrices as the input variables. In this article, we formulate and discuss three types of DMPT, with two of them based only on density matrices: the approach of Kussmann and Ochsenfeld [J. Chem. Phys. 127, 054103 (2007)] is reformulated via the Sylvester equation and the recursive DMPT of Niklasson and Challacombe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 193001 (2004)] is extended to the hole-particle canonical purification (HPCP) from Truflandier et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 091102 (2016)]. A comparison of the computational performances shows that the aforementioned methods outperform the standard SOS. The HPCP-DMPT demonstrates stable convergence profiles but at a higher computational cost when compared to the original recursive polynomial method.
Density matrix perturbation theory (DMPT) is known as a promising alternative to the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory, in which the sum-over-states (SOS) is replaced by algorithms with perturbed density matrices as the input variables. In this article, we formulate and discuss three types of DMPT, with two of them based only on density matrices: the approach of Kussmann and Ochsenfeld [J. Chem. Phys. 127, 054103 (2007)] is reformulated via the Sylvester equation and the recursive DMPT of Niklasson and Challacombe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 193001 (2004)] is extended to the hole-particle canonical purification (HPCP) from Truflandier et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 144, 091102 (2016)]. A comparison of the computational performances shows that the aforementioned methods outperform the standard SOS. The HPCP-DMPT demonstrates stable convergence profiles but at a higher computational cost when compared to the original recursive polynomial method.