Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Nature

“Physics and Metaphysics”

L. Rosenfeld

Published Jun 28, 1958• 23 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1038/1811814b0

Related papers

“Physics and Metaphysics”

Louis de Broglie

Nature•Jun 28, 1958•14 citations

Physics, Metaphysics and Mathematics

Dennis Dieks

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Metaphysics and Modern Physics

Clifford Alan Hooker

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•12 citations

Metaphysics and Quantum Physics

Peter J. Lewis

Routledge eBooks•Feb 17, 2015•0 citations

Science and Metaphysics: The Case of Quantum Physics

Michaël Esfeld

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•5 citations

Floating free from physics: the metaphysics of quantum mechanics

Raoni Wohnrath Arroyo, Jonas R. Becker Arenhart

We discuss some methodological aspects of the relation between physics and metaphysics by dealing specifically with the case of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Our main claim is that current attempts to productively integrate quantum mechanics and metaphysics are best seen as approaches of what should be called `the metaphysics of science', which is developed by applying already existing metaphysical concepts to scientific theories. We argue that, in this perspective, metaphysics must be understood as an autonomous discipline. It results that this metaphysics cannot hope to derive any kind of justification from science. Thus, one of the main motivations of such project, which is the obtaining of a scientifically respectable justification for the attribution of a single true metaphysical profile to the posits of a scientific theory, is doomed because of the emergence of metaphysical underdetermination from the outset. If metaphysics floats free from physics, which is a premise of such project of integration between these two areas, then it is always possible to attribute more than one metaphysical profile to dress physical entities.

arXiv:2012.05822•Dec 10, 2020•6 citations
We discuss some methodological aspects of the relation between physics and metaphysics by dealing specifically with the case of non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Our main claim is that current attempts to productively integrate quantum mechanics and metaphysics are best seen as approaches of what should be called `the metaphysics of science', which is developed by applying already existing metaphysical concepts to scientific theories. We argue that, in this perspective, metaphysics must be understood as an autonomous discipline. It results that this metaphysics cannot hope to derive any kind of justification from science. Thus, one of the main motivations of such project, which is the obtaining of a scientifically respectable justification for the attribution of a single true metaphysical profile to the posits of a scientific theory, is doomed because of the emergence of metaphysical underdetermination from the outset. If metaphysics floats free from physics, which is a premise of such project of integration between these two areas, then it is always possible to attribute more than one metaphysical profile to dress physical entities.