Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry

Pointwise and generalized virial theorems

Mel Levy

Published Jun 18, 2009• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Given an eigenstate of a time-independent Hamiltonian, an equation is derived which generates the corresponding energy by means of a pointwise application of only the kinetic operator. Satisfaction of the equation at all points in configuration space, for arbitrary values of a scale factor, constitutes a necessary eigenstate condition. Explicit knowledge of the potential operator, other than knowledge of its homogeneity, is not required. In addition, integration of the pointwise equation yields a generalization of the familiar virial theorem.

DOI
10.1002/qua.560140827

Related papers

The Wavefunctions and Energy Eigenvalues of the Schrodinger Equation for Different Potentials Due to the Virial Theorem

Hasan Arslan, N. Hulaguhanoglu

The derivation of the virial theorem is presented both in classical and quantum mechanical approach.The kinetic energy and potential energy of the mechanical energy is converted to each other due to the virial theorem.Some of the dierent potentials are considered.For some of these potentials, the wavefunctions and energy eigenvalues of the Schrödinger Equation are derived.

Acta Physica Polonica A•Apr 1, 2015•0 citations

Local Virial and Tensor Theorems

Leon W. Cohen

We show that for any wave function and potential the local virial theorem can always be satisfied 2K(r) = r·ΔV by choosing a particular expression for the local kinetic energy. In addition, we show that for each choice of local kinetic energy there are an infinite number of quasi-probability distributions which will generate the same expression. We also consider the local tensor virial theorem.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry A•Aug 24, 2011•5 citations

A generalized quantum virial equation

Jan‐Åke Schweitz

A method, similar to the one previously used by the author in his derivation of a generalized classical virial theorem (see ibid., vol.10, no.4, p.507 (1977)), is used to derive a generalized quantum virial equation. This equation is applicable to any part of a larger system of particles. Furthermore, by the introduction of a flux density operator, it is possible to express the quantum surface flux virial in two alternative forms, as easily interpreted as the classical form. As an intermediate result, an equation of continuity for a general one-particle observable is obtained. In an appendix, an equation of motion of the reduced density matrix of the first order is derived.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 1, 1977•8 citations

Unitary Operators and Variational Approaches for One-Dimensional Hamiltonians

Guillermo H. Bozzolo, Carlos Esebbag, J. Nunez +1 more

Several variational approaches for the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation are devised by recourse to suitable expansions of the unitary operator that relates the corresponding eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator. A connection with the virial theorem, via scaling properties is established and an application to the ring puckering motion is discussed.

Progress of Theoretical Physics•Jul 1, 1988•0 citations

Ground-state-energy theorem and the virial theorem of a many-particle system in d dimensions

Naoki Iwamoto

It is shown by dimensional analysis that Pauli's ground-state-energy theorem, which expresses the ground-state energy in the form of a coupling-constant integration of the potential energy, and the virial theorem are equivalent for a many-particle system interacting with a homogeneous interparticle potential ($\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{l}$) in arbitrary ($d$) dimensions. The finite-temperature case is also discussed.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1984•10 citations

SYSTEMS OF IDENTICAL PARTICLES

Mircea S. Rogalski, Stuart B. Palmer

If we consider ( ) 2,kr tΨ G to be the probability density for finding, at time t, particle 1 at particle k at and particle N at ,,1 … Gr …G ,kr ,Nr G a normalization condition analogous to Eq.(29.2) holds as (35.2) 1V* =ΨΨ∫ d The integral is defined in a space with 3N dimensions called the configuration space of the system, where a configuration point is given by 3N position coordinates 1 1 1, , , , , , , , , ,k k k N N N ,x y z x y z x y z… … and the volume element is NNNkkkNk dzdydxdzdydxdzdydxdddd ………… 1111 VVVV == Physical observables of the system will be represented by Hermitian operators, obtained from the classical representation in terms of the position and momentum variables as indicated by Postulate 2. Thus the many-particle Hamiltonian results from Eq.(2.32) as ( ) (∑ ∑ = ≠ ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ++∇−= k rrUtrU m H ,, 2 ˆ GGG= ) ) (35.3) where only acts on the coordinates of the kth particle, of mass The one-particle potential energy is due to external fields where this particle moves and k∇ .km( trU kk ,G( )jkkj rrU GG , gives the mutual interaction between the particles k and j. It is assumed that the position and momentum operators of different particles commute, and so do all the operators describing single-particle observables if they refer to different particles. The evolution of a many-particle system will be then formulated as a generalization of Eq.(30.6) in terms of given by Eqs.(35.1) and (35.3) HˆandΨ Ψ=∂ Ψ∂ H t i ˆ= (35.4) If the Hamiltonian (35.3) does not depend explicitly on the time, it is usual to express the time dependence of the many-particle state function by means of the evolution operator defined as ( )tUˆ ( ) ( ) ( )NkNk rrrtUtrrr G…G…GG…G…G ,,,,ˆ,,,,, 11 αΨ=Ψ (35.5) which is formally derived from Eq.(35.4) as ( ) ( ) ( )ˆˆ ˆU ti U t i HU t t t ˆα α α ∂∂ ⎡ ⎤Ψ = Ψ =⎣ ⎦∂ ∂= = Ψ It follows that (35.6) ( ) =/ˆˆ tHietU −= which is the analogue of Eq.(30.12). The evolution operator is unitary, Eq.(II.22), since ( ) ( )†ˆ ˆU t U t Iˆ= (35.7) Substituting Eq.(35.5), one obtains from Eq.(35.4) that the stationary states of the Nparticle systems are given by the energy eigenvalue equation ( ) ( )1 1ˆ , , , , , , , ,k N k NH r r r E r r rα α αΨ = ΨG G G G G G… … … … (35.8) The solution to the N-particle problem is facilitated if we take into account the symmetries of many systems of physical interest, which allow us to define constants of motion and criteria for simplifying the form (35.3) of the Hamiltonian operator. An alternative to complex explicit calculations is to associate with specific symmetries time independent unitary operators which transform the state functions into so that Eq.(35.4) gives ˆ ,U Ψ ˆ ,U Ψ ( ) ( )†ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆi U i U UH UHU Ut t∂ ∂ΨΨ = = Ψ = Ψ∂ ∂= = ˆ This is again a Schrödinger equation for the state Uˆ Ψ with the new Hamiltonian †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆH UHU′ = If the Hamiltonian remains unchanged by the transformation, we have (35.9) †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆor , 0H UHU U H⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦ = According to the evolution equation (29.43), this implies that so that U is a constant of motion. If the unitary transformation which leaves the Hamiltonian invariant, is a function of an observable, its constancy implies that the given observable is a constant in any state of the system.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 8, 2014•0 citations
Given an eigenstate of a time-independent Hamiltonian, an equation is derived which generates the corresponding energy by means of a pointwise application of only the kinetic operator. Satisfaction of the equation at all points in configuration space, for arbitrary values of a scale factor, constitutes a necessary eigenstate condition. Explicit knowledge of the potential operator, other than knowledge of its homogeneity, is not required. In addition, integration of the pointwise equation yields a generalization of the familiar virial theorem.
A method, similar to the one previously used by the author in his derivation of a generalized classical virial theorem (see ibid., vol.10, no.4, p.507 (1977)), is used to derive a generalized quantum virial equation. This equation is applicable to any part of a larger system of particles. Furthermore, by the introduction of a flux density operator, it is possible to express the quantum surface flux virial in two alternative forms, as easily interpreted as the classical form. As an intermediate result, an equation of continuity for a general one-particle observable is obtained. In an appendix, an equation of motion of the reduced density matrix of the first order is derived.
It is shown by dimensional analysis that Pauli's ground-state-energy theorem, which expresses the ground-state energy in the form of a coupling-constant integration of the potential energy, and the virial theorem are equivalent for a many-particle system interacting with a homogeneous interparticle potential ($\ensuremath{\propto}{r}^{l}$) in arbitrary (ddd) dimensions. The finite-temperature case is also discussed.
If we consider ( ) 2,kr tΨ G to be the probability density for finding, at time t, particle 1 at particle k at and particle N at ,,1 … Gr …G ,kr ,Nr G a normalization condition analogous to Eq.(29.2) holds as (35.2) 1V* =ΨΨ∫ d The integral is defined in a space with 3N dimensions called the configuration space of the system, where a configuration point is given by 3N position coordinates 1 1 1, , , , , , , , , ,k k k N N N ,x y z x y z x y z… … and the volume element is NNNkkkNk dzdydxdzdydxdzdydxdddd ………… 1111 VVVV == Physical observables of the system will be represented by Hermitian operators, obtained from the classical representation in terms of the position and momentum variables as indicated by Postulate 2. Thus the many-particle Hamiltonian results from Eq.(2.32) as ( ) (∑ ∑ = ≠ ⎥⎥⎦ ⎤ ⎢⎢⎣ ⎡ ++∇−= k rrUtrU m H ,, 2 ˆ GGG= ) ) (35.3) where only acts on the coordinates of the kth particle, of mass The one-particle potential energy is due to external fields where this particle moves and k∇ .km( trU kk ,G( )jkkj rrU GG , gives the mutual interaction between the particles k and j. It is assumed that the position and momentum operators of different particles commute, and so do all the operators describing single-particle observables if they refer to different particles. The evolution of a many-particle system will be then formulated as a generalization of Eq.(30.6) in terms of given by Eqs.(35.1) and (35.3) HˆandΨ Ψ=∂ Ψ∂ H t i ˆ= (35.4) If the Hamiltonian (35.3) does not depend explicitly on the time, it is usual to express the time dependence of the many-particle state function by means of the evolution operator defined as ( )tUˆ ( ) ( ) ( )NkNk rrrtUtrrr G…G…GG…G…G ,,,,ˆ,,,,, 11 αΨ=Ψ (35.5) which is formally derived from Eq.(35.4) as ( ) ( ) ( )ˆˆ ˆU ti U t i HU t t t ˆα α α ∂∂ ⎡ ⎤Ψ = Ψ =⎣ ⎦∂ ∂= = Ψ It follows that (35.6) ( ) =/ˆˆ tHietU −= which is the analogue of Eq.(30.12). The evolution operator is unitary, Eq.(II.22), since ( ) ( )†ˆ ˆU t U t Iˆ= (35.7) Substituting Eq.(35.5), one obtains from Eq.(35.4) that the stationary states of the Nparticle systems are given by the energy eigenvalue equation ( ) ( )1 1ˆ , , , , , , , ,k N k NH r r r E r r rα α αΨ = ΨG G G G G G… … … … (35.8) The solution to the N-particle problem is facilitated if we take into account the symmetries of many systems of physical interest, which allow us to define constants of motion and criteria for simplifying the form (35.3) of the Hamiltonian operator. An alternative to complex explicit calculations is to associate with specific symmetries time independent unitary operators which transform the state functions into so that Eq.(35.4) gives ˆ ,U Ψ ˆ ,U Ψ ( ) ( )†ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆi U i U UH UHU Ut t∂ ∂ΨΨ = = Ψ = Ψ∂ ∂= = ˆ This is again a Schrödinger equation for the state Uˆ Ψ with the new Hamiltonian †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆH UHU′ = If the Hamiltonian remains unchanged by the transformation, we have (35.9) †ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆor , 0H UHU U H⎡ ⎤= ⎣ ⎦ = According to the evolution equation (29.43), this implies that so that U is a constant of motion. If the unitary transformation which leaves the Hamiltonian invariant, is a function of an observable, its constancy implies that the given observable is a constant in any state of the system.