Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Geometry and Physics

Quantum ball as an example of quantum Kähler manifold

Grzegorz Jakimowicz, Anatol Odzijewicz

Published Nov 15, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.geomphys.2008.11.002

Related papers

On a Fuzzy Kähler-like Manifold which is Consistent with the Two Slit Experiment

Mohamed Saladin El Naschie

International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation•Jan 1, 2005•228 citations

Kähler fibrations in quantum information theory

Ivan Contreras, Michele Schiavina

arXiv:1801.09793•manuscripta mathematica•May 20, 2021•0 citations

Stochastic Schrödinger evolution and symmetric Kähler manifolds of low dimension

Lane P. Hughston, K. P. Tod

We consider the manifold-valued, stochastic extension of the Schrödinger equation introduced by Hughston (Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A452 (1996) 953) in a manifestly covariant, differential-geometric framework, and examine the resulting quantum evolution on some specific examples of Kähler manifolds with many symmetries. We find conditions on the curvature for the evolution to be a `collapse process' in the sense of Brody and Hughston (Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A458 (2002) 1117) or, more generally, a `reduction process', and give examples that satisfy these conditions. For some of these examples, we show that the Lüders projection postulate admits a consistent interpretation and remains valid in the nonlinear regime.

arXiv:quant-ph/0212107•Dec 18, 2002•0 citations

Quantum manifolds

Manuel Hohmann

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2012•1 citation

Geometry of variational methods: dynamics of closed quantum systems

Lucas Hackl, Tommaso Guaita, Tao Shi +3 more

We present a systematic geometric framework to study closed quantum systems based on suitably chosen variational families. For the purpose of (A) real time evolution, (B) excitation spectra, (C) spectral functions and (D) imaginary time evolution, we show how the geometric approach highlights the necessity to distinguish between two classes of manifolds: Kähler and non-Kähler. Traditional variational methods typically require the variational family to be a Kähler manifold, where multiplication by the imaginary unit preserves the tangent spaces. This covers the vast majority of cases studied in the literature. However, recently proposed classes of generalized Gaussian states make it necessary to also include the non-Kähler case, which has already been encountered occasionally. We illustrate our approach in detail with a range of concrete examples where the geometric structures of the considered manifolds are particularly relevant. These go from Gaussian states and group theoretic coherent states to generalized Gaussian states.

arXiv:2004.01015•SciPost Physics•Oct 8, 2020•110 citations

Quantum Statistical Manifolds: The Finite-Dimensional Case

Jan Naudts

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2019•2 citations
We consider the manifold-valued, stochastic extension of the Schrödinger equation introduced by Hughston (Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A452 (1996) 953) in a manifestly covariant, differential-geometric framework, and examine the resulting quantum evolution on some specific examples of Kähler manifolds with many symmetries. We find conditions on the curvature for the evolution to be a `collapse process' in the sense of Brody and Hughston (Proc.Roy.Soc.Lond. A458 (2002) 1117) or, more generally, a `reduction process', and give examples that satisfy these conditions. For some of these examples, we show that the Lüders projection postulate admits a consistent interpretation and remains valid in the nonlinear regime.
We present a systematic geometric framework to study closed quantum systems based on suitably chosen variational families. For the purpose of (A) real time evolution, (B) excitation spectra, (C) spectral functions and (D) imaginary time evolution, we show how the geometric approach highlights the necessity to distinguish between two classes of manifolds: Kähler and non-Kähler. Traditional variational methods typically require the variational family to be a Kähler manifold, where multiplication by the imaginary unit preserves the tangent spaces. This covers the vast majority of cases studied in the literature. However, recently proposed classes of generalized Gaussian states make it necessary to also include the non-Kähler case, which has already been encountered occasionally. We illustrate our approach in detail with a range of concrete examples where the geometric structures of the considered manifolds are particularly relevant. These go from Gaussian states and group theoretic coherent states to generalized Gaussian states.