Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Wireless Personal Communications

A Novel Approach for Physical Layer Cryptography in Wireless Networks

Lorenzo Mucchi, Luca Simone Ronga, E. Del Re

Published Mar 11, 2010• 15 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/s11277-010-9950-6

Related papers

A physical layer security scheme for 6G wireless networks using post-quantum cryptography

Walid Abdallah

Computer Communications•Feb 21, 2024•31 citations

Physical layer security schemes for wireless communication systems

Marwan Yusuf

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Cross-Layer Cryptography For Wireless Communication

Hesham Hashim Mohammed

Spectrum access in the next-generation wireless networks will be congested, competitive, and vulnerable to malicious intents of strong adversaries. This motivates us to rethink secure wireless communication in a zero-trust electromagnetic environment. Classical cryptography is an add-on feature that provides semantic security between trusted partners at higherlayers. However, cryptography ignores cross-layer interaction with physical layer which is required to enhance the secrecy level of the transmitted waveform. Moreover, cryptographic schemes might no longer be secure in the quantum era. Physical layer security (PLS) is introduced as a complement to cryptography, where security is provided in the physical layer using the channel state information (CSI) between the trusted partners. Although PLS can theoretically provide perfect secrecy, it might be impractical in many scenarios due to the constraints imposed on adversary’s reception.

•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations

Physical Layer Approaches for Securing Wireless Communication Systems

Hong Wen

SpringerBriefs in computer science•Jan 1, 2013•29 citations

Physical layer based secret key exchange and authentication techniques for wireless networks

Hasan Taha

•Jan 1, 2018•0 citations

Physical Layer Security for WSNs: Addressing Eavesdropping and Energy Constraints

Ruhisulthana Shaik, M. Veeresh Babu, Srilekha Medichelimi +3 more

Physical layer security has been widely read up for decades to use physical layer qualities like unconventionality in wireless channels, motion toward clamor ratio hole, conscious sticking, and so on, to secure wireless correspondences. Secret rate is essential to define secure communication transmission rate in the presence of an eavesdropper. WSNs need secure communications since sensors send data to a fusion center. The most common cryptography techniques have been considered, but most of them are too computationally and energy-intensive for WSNs. Digital telecommunications networks sharing resources are called data networks. There are two networks: wired and wireless. Wireless networks are very popular due to its wireless setup and many household, business, and telecommunications networking applications. WSN were created when sensors detected physical or environmental conditions like pressure, temperature, or beam. WSN are elastic, easy, and straightforward. They grow because they're cheap and efficient. Wireless Sensor Networks have multiple sensor nodes scattered across a field that can measure, sense, compute, communicate, and send results to a base station. With increasing competence, security is also improving. Though the network was designed to be safe, hackers and attackers always find a way in and attack.

International Conference Inventive Material Science Applications•May 28, 2025•1 citation
Spectrum access in the next-generation wireless networks will be congested, competitive, and vulnerable to malicious intents of strong adversaries. This motivates us to rethink secure wireless communication in a zero-trust electromagnetic environment. Classical cryptography is an add-on feature that provides semantic security between trusted partners at higherlayers. However, cryptography ignores cross-layer interaction with physical layer which is required to enhance the secrecy level of the transmitted waveform. Moreover, cryptographic schemes might no longer be secure in the quantum era. Physical layer security (PLS) is introduced as a complement to cryptography, where security is provided in the physical layer using the channel state information (CSI) between the trusted partners. Although PLS can theoretically provide perfect secrecy, it might be impractical in many scenarios due to the constraints imposed on adversary’s reception.
Physical layer security has been widely read up for decades to use physical layer qualities like unconventionality in wireless channels, motion toward clamor ratio hole, conscious sticking, and so on, to secure wireless correspondences. Secret rate is essential to define secure communication transmission rate in the presence of an eavesdropper. WSNs need secure communications since sensors send data to a fusion center. The most common cryptography techniques have been considered, but most of them are too computationally and energy-intensive for WSNs. Digital telecommunications networks sharing resources are called data networks. There are two networks: wired and wireless. Wireless networks are very popular due to its wireless setup and many household, business, and telecommunications networking applications. WSN were created when sensors detected physical or environmental conditions like pressure, temperature, or beam. WSN are elastic, easy, and straightforward. They grow because they're cheap and efficient. Wireless Sensor Networks have multiple sensor nodes scattered across a field that can measure, sense, compute, communicate, and send results to a base station. With increasing competence, security is also improving. Though the network was designed to be safe, hackers and attackers always find a way in and attack.