Physical review. B, Condensed matter
Collective-mode approximations in the two-dimensional large- N t−J model
Marilyn F. Bishop, Zane P. Gibbs, T. McMullen
Abstract
The one-electron spectral function $\ensuremath{\rho}(\mathit{k},\ensuremath{\omega})$ for the large-$\mathcal{N}$ $t\ensuremath{-}J$ model typically consists of two distinct peaks: a dispersive quasiparticle and a lower-energy incoherent structure. This is reminiscent of the spectral function of the weak coupling Hubbard model in which the electron is coupled to antiferromagnetic spin fluctuations. In both theories, the two-peaked pattern can be traced to the frequency dependence of the (normal) electron self-energy $\ensuremath{\Sigma}(\mathit{k},\ensuremath{\omega})$. What interaction causes this particular $\ensuremath{\omega}$ dependence of $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$? In the weak coupling case it is clearly the emission and absorption of an antiferromagnetic spin fluctuation by the electron. In the slave boson formulation of the large-$\mathcal{N}$ $t\ensuremath{-}J$ model, there are six bosonic excitations: the slave bosons, the constraint field, and the real and imaginary parts of the hopping amplitudes in both the x and y directions. None of these are obviously related to a spin fluctuation propagator. These bosons have the unusual property of transmuting in flight---that is, they are not eigenstates. In order to try to make physical sense of the interaction that is primarily responsible for the frequency dependence of $\ensuremath{\Sigma}$ and the structure of $\ensuremath{\rho}(\mathit{k},\ensuremath{\omega})$, we investigate the transformation to a representation in which the boson propagator matrix is diagonal and extract the contributions of the slave bosons and the constraint field, which appear to be of particular importance.