Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters

Two-particle spin states and generalized Bell’s inequalities

V. A. Andreev, Vladimir I. Man’ko

Published Jul 1, 2000• 14 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A new formalism for calculation of the spin correlation magnitude is developed. In this approach, the mean value of an operator acting in the four-dimensional space of two-particle spin states has the form of a scalar product of vectors defined in the three-dimensional direction space. A complete description of the two-particle spin states satisfying Bell inequalities is given in this formalism. It is shown that these states include both factorable and entangled states.

DOI
10.1134/1.1312020

Related papers

The Reduction of Density Matrix and Measurement of Bell-CHSH Inequalities

V. A. Andreev

The right hand side of Bell inequalities don’t depend on a form of any two‐particle spin state. In the case of the generalized Bell‐Clauser‐Horne‐Schimony‐Holt inequalities the right hand side depend on a form of concrete two‐particle state. The left hand sides of these inequalities depend on four arbitrary vectors defined in three‐dimensional space. They define directions on which spins of particles forming a correlated pair are projected. Our aim is to find such vectors that left‐hand side of the inequality should takes its maximum value. In other words on these vectors the inequality transforms into equality. It is shown that it can be done with the help of special reduction of density matrix of two‐state spin state.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Entangled states

Michel Le Bellac

Up to now we have limited ourselves to states of a single particle. In the present chapter we shall introduce the description of two-particle states. Once this case is understood, it will be easy to generalize to any number of particles. States of two (or more) particles lead to very rich configurations called entangled states. A remarkable feature is that two entangled quantum particles, even at arbitrarily large spatial separations, continue to form a single entity and no classical probabilistic model is able to reproduce the correlation between particles. In the first section we shall present the essential mathematical formalism, that of the tensor product. This will permit us in Section 6.2 to describe quantum mixtures using the state operator formalism. Section 6.3 is devoted to the study of important physical consequences like the Bell inequalities and interference experiments involving entangled states, which will lead us to a deeper understanding of quantum physics. Finally, in the last section we shall briefly review applications to measurement theory and quantum information theory. The latter is undergoing rapid development at present and has applications to quantum computing, cryptography, and teleportation. The tensor product of two vector spaces Definition and properties of the tensor product We wish to construct the space of states of two physical systems which we assume initially to be completely independent. Let ℌ N 1 and ℌ M 2 be the spaces of states of the two systems, of dimension N and M , respectively.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 23, 2006•0 citations

Analyzing the correlations for spin-1/2 particles and singlet pairs

de Faria, Edson, Tresser, Charles

We revisit the computation of correlations of spin projections onto unit vectors for spin-1/2 particles in Quantum Mechanics. We then choose one of the Boole inequalities that, as we recall, must be obeyed by collections of sequences of normalized spin-1/2 projections onto unit vectors that belong to, say, the plane that is orthogonal to the classical trajectory or to the three dimensional space. Next we define the concept of being a-p for i-indexed sequences of spin-1/2 particles: it turns out that a sequence of spin-1/2 particles is a-p if and only if the particles behave as if they had indeed been prepared (in the usual sense) to have definite spins +1 or -1 along the axis a, the sequence of signs being pre-determined. The a-p property is formulated in a way abstract enough to let one generalize it and we define the concept of being a-p and b-p. However, using our chosen Boole inequality we prove that no particle sequence can be both a-p and b-p when a and b are not co-linear. We next consider two modifications of Quantum Mechanics: - The first one by assuming both Weak Realism, the weakest form of Realism needed to develop any main theorem in Bell's Theory, and Locality. - The second one by assuming Weak Realism and an hypothesis that turns out to be none else than (relativistic) Causality extended to cover as well the observable values that make sense only if one assumes Weak Realism. In both cases we arrive at the conclusion that in the EPRB setting where successive pairs of spin-1/2 particles are prepared in the so-called singlet state, one of these particles sequences is both a-p and b-p and a and b are the opposite of the vectors respectively used to project the spin of the other particle and to get the Realism-based alternate value for a projection. Thus the usual discussions of Bell's inequalities under such hypotheses do not even make physical sense.

arXiv:1201.0051•Dec 30, 2011•1 citation

Spin correlations in two-particle systems: a pedagogically motivated comparison of computational approaches

S. Martins-Filho

In this work we present a pedagogically motivated analysis of spin-correlation calculations in a quantum system composed of two spin-$1/2$ particles. Rather than aiming at new physical results, our purpose is to clarify and bring attention to different strategies for evaluating expectation values of the form $\langle ψ| S^{(1)}_{\hat{\boldsymbol{u}}} S^{(2)}_{\hat{\boldsymbol{v}}} | ψ\rangle$, which play an important role in discussions of entanglement and Bell-type correlations. We compare three complementary approaches. The first follows a direct algebraic evaluation in the product basis, closely related to standard textbook methods. The second uses a matrix representation of bipartite states, in which the tensor-product structure is expressed in terms of $2\times2$ complex matrices. This representation keeps the calculation close to the familiar Pauli-matrix algebra and makes the independent action of operators on each subsystem more transparent. The third explores a symmetry-based argument, highlighting both its usefulness and its limitations when applied beyond the singlet state. We show explicitly that the singlet state is rotationally invariant, which explains why the symmetry argument successfully reproduces its correlation function, while a naive extension fails for triplet states. The discussion illustrates how entanglement, tensor-product structure, and rotational symmetry interplay in spin correlations.

physics.ed-phCross-listedarXiv:2606.02361•Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física•Jun 2, 2026•0 citations

Spin-1/2 one- and two- particle systems in physical space without eigen-algebra or tensor product

Sokol Andoni

Abstract A novel representation of spin 1/2 combines in a single geometric object the roles of the standard Pauli spin vector operator and spin state. Under the spin-position decoupling approximation it consists of three orthonormal vectors comprising a gauge phase. In the one-particle case the representation: (1) is Hermitian; (2) shows handedness; (3) reproduces all standard expectation values, including the total one-particle spin modulus 𝑆tot = (ℏ/2)√3; (4) constrains basis opposite spins to have same handedness; (5) allows to formalize irreversibility in spin measurement. In the two-particle case: (1) entangled pairs have precisely related gauge phases; (2) the dimensionality of the spin space doubles due to variation of handedness; (3) the four maximally entangled states are naturally defined by the four improper rotations in 3D: reflections onto the three orthogonal frame planes (triplets) and inversion (singlet). Cross-product terms in the expression for the squared total spin of two particles relate to experiment and they yield all standard expectation values after measurement. Here spin is directly defined and transformed in 3D orientation space, without use of eigen algebra and tensor product as done in the standard formulation. The formalism allows working with whole geometric objects instead of only components, thereby helping keep a clear geometric picture of ‘on paper’ (controlled gauge phase) and ‘on lab’ (uncontrolled gauge phase) spin transformations.

•Sep 3, 2021•0 citations

Spin-1/2 one- and two- particle systems in physical space without eigen-algebra or tensor product

Sokol Andoni

Abstract A novel representation of spin 1/2 combines in a single geometric object the roles of the standard Pauli spin vector and spin state. Under the spin-position decoupling approximation it consists of the ordered sum of three orthonormal vectors comprising a gauge phase. In the one-particle case the representation: (1) is Hermitian; (2) is oriented due to ordering; (3) reproduces all standard expectation values, including the total one-particle spin modulus A; (4) constrains basis opposite spins to have same orientation; (5) allows to formalize irreversibility in spin measurement. In the two-particle case: (1) entangled spin pairs have opposite orientation and precisely related gauge phases; (2) the dimensionality of the spin space doubles due to variation of orientation; (3) the four maximally entangled states are naturally defined by the four improper rotations in 3D: reflections onto the three orthogonal frame planes (triplets) and inversion (singlet). The cross-product terms in the expression for the squared total spin of two particles relates to experiment and they yield all standard expectation values after measurement. Here spin is directly defined and transformed in 3D orientation space, without use of eigen algebra and tensor product as in the standard formulation. The formalism allows working with whole geometric objects instead of only components, thereby helping keep a clear geometric picture of ‘on paper’ (controlled gauge phase) and ‘on lab’ (uncontrolled gauge phase) spin transformations.

•Mar 26, 2021•0 citations
A new formalism for calculation of the spin correlation magnitude is developed. In this approach, the mean value of an operator acting in the four-dimensional space of two-particle spin states has the form of a scalar product of vectors defined in the three-dimensional direction space. A complete description of the two-particle spin states satisfying Bell inequalities is given in this formalism. It is shown that these states include both factorable and entangled states.
The right hand side of Bell inequalities don’t depend on a form of any two‐particle spin state. In the case of the generalized Bell‐Clauser‐Horne‐Schimony‐Holt inequalities the right hand side depend on a form of concrete two‐particle state. The left hand sides of these inequalities depend on four arbitrary vectors defined in three‐dimensional space. They define directions on which spins of particles forming a correlated pair are projected. Our aim is to find such vectors that left‐hand side of the inequality should takes its maximum value. In other words on these vectors the inequality transforms into equality. It is shown that it can be done with the help of special reduction of density matrix of two‐state spin state.
Up to now we have limited ourselves to states of a single particle. In the present chapter we shall introduce the description of two-particle states. Once this case is understood, it will be easy to generalize to any number of particles. States of two (or more) particles lead to very rich configurations called entangled states. A remarkable feature is that two entangled quantum particles, even at arbitrarily large spatial separations, continue to form a single entity and no classical probabilistic model is able to reproduce the correlation between particles. In the first section we shall present the essential mathematical formalism, that of the tensor product. This will permit us in Section 6.2 to describe quantum mixtures using the state operator formalism. Section 6.3 is devoted to the study of important physical consequences like the Bell inequalities and interference experiments involving entangled states, which will lead us to a deeper understanding of quantum physics. Finally, in the last section we shall briefly review applications to measurement theory and quantum information theory. The latter is undergoing rapid development at present and has applications to quantum computing, cryptography, and teleportation. The tensor product of two vector spaces Definition and properties of the tensor product We wish to construct the space of states of two physical systems which we assume initially to be completely independent. Let ℌ N 1 and ℌ M 2 be the spaces of states of the two systems, of dimension N and M , respectively.
We revisit the computation of correlations of spin projections onto unit vectors for spin-1/2 particles in Quantum Mechanics. We then choose one of the Boole inequalities that, as we recall, must be obeyed by collections of sequences of normalized spin-1/2 projections onto unit vectors that belong to, say, the plane that is orthogonal to the classical trajectory or to the three dimensional space. Next we define the concept of being a-p for i-indexed sequences of spin-1/2 particles: it turns out that a sequence of spin-1/2 particles is a-p if and only if the particles behave as if they had indeed been prepared (in the usual sense) to have definite spins +1 or -1 along the axis a, the sequence of signs being pre-determined. The a-p property is formulated in a way abstract enough to let one generalize it and we define the concept of being a-p and b-p. However, using our chosen Boole inequality we prove that no particle sequence can be both a-p and b-p when a and b are not co-linear. We next consider two modifications of Quantum Mechanics: - The first one by assuming both Weak Realism, the weakest form of Realism needed to develop any main theorem in Bell's Theory, and Locality. - The second one by assuming Weak Realism and an hypothesis that turns out to be none else than (relativistic) Causality extended to cover as well the observable values that make sense only if one assumes Weak Realism. In both cases we arrive at the conclusion that in the EPRB setting where successive pairs of spin-1/2 particles are prepared in the so-called singlet state, one of these particles sequences is both a-p and b-p and a and b are the opposite of the vectors respectively used to project the spin of the other particle and to get the Realism-based alternate value for a projection. Thus the usual discussions of Bell's inequalities under such hypotheses do not even make physical sense.
In this work we present a pedagogically motivated analysis of spin-correlation calculations in a quantum system composed of two spin-1/21/21/2 particles. Rather than aiming at new physical results, our purpose is to clarify and bring attention to different strategies for evaluating expectation values of the form ⟨ψ∣Su^(1)Sv^(2)∣ψ⟩\langle ψ| S^{(1)}_{\hat{\boldsymbol{u}}} S^{(2)}_{\hat{\boldsymbol{v}}} | ψ\rangle⟨ψ∣Su^(1)​Sv^(2)​∣ψ⟩, which play an important role in discussions of entanglement and Bell-type correlations. We compare three complementary approaches. The first follows a direct algebraic evaluation in the product basis, closely related to standard textbook methods. The second uses a matrix representation of bipartite states, in which the tensor-product structure is expressed in terms of 2×22\times22×2 complex matrices. This representation keeps the calculation close to the familiar Pauli-matrix algebra and makes the independent action of operators on each subsystem more transparent. The third explores a symmetry-based argument, highlighting both its usefulness and its limitations when applied beyond the singlet state. We show explicitly that the singlet state is rotationally invariant, which explains why the symmetry argument successfully reproduces its correlation function, while a naive extension fails for triplet states. The discussion illustrates how entanglement, tensor-product structure, and rotational symmetry interplay in spin correlations.
Abstract A novel representation of spin 1/2 combines in a single geometric object the roles of the standard Pauli spin vector operator and spin state. Under the spin-position decoupling approximation it consists of three orthonormal vectors comprising a gauge phase. In the one-particle case the representation: (1) is Hermitian; (2) shows handedness; (3) reproduces all standard expectation values, including the total one-particle spin modulus 𝑆tot = (ℏ/2)√3; (4) constrains basis opposite spins to have same handedness; (5) allows to formalize irreversibility in spin measurement. In the two-particle case: (1) entangled pairs have precisely related gauge phases; (2) the dimensionality of the spin space doubles due to variation of handedness; (3) the four maximally entangled states are naturally defined by the four improper rotations in 3D: reflections onto the three orthogonal frame planes (triplets) and inversion (singlet). Cross-product terms in the expression for the squared total spin of two particles relate to experiment and they yield all standard expectation values after measurement. Here spin is directly defined and transformed in 3D orientation space, without use of eigen algebra and tensor product as done in the standard formulation. The formalism allows working with whole geometric objects instead of only components, thereby helping keep a clear geometric picture of ‘on paper’ (controlled gauge phase) and ‘on lab’ (uncontrolled gauge phase) spin transformations.
Abstract A novel representation of spin 1/2 combines in a single geometric object the roles of the standard Pauli spin vector and spin state. Under the spin-position decoupling approximation it consists of the ordered sum of three orthonormal vectors comprising a gauge phase. In the one-particle case the representation: (1) is Hermitian; (2) is oriented due to ordering; (3) reproduces all standard expectation values, including the total one-particle spin modulus A; (4) constrains basis opposite spins to have same orientation; (5) allows to formalize irreversibility in spin measurement. In the two-particle case: (1) entangled spin pairs have opposite orientation and precisely related gauge phases; (2) the dimensionality of the spin space doubles due to variation of orientation; (3) the four maximally entangled states are naturally defined by the four improper rotations in 3D: reflections onto the three orthogonal frame planes (triplets) and inversion (singlet). The cross-product terms in the expression for the squared total spin of two particles relates to experiment and they yield all standard expectation values after measurement. Here spin is directly defined and transformed in 3D orientation space, without use of eigen algebra and tensor product as in the standard formulation. The formalism allows working with whole geometric objects instead of only components, thereby helping keep a clear geometric picture of ‘on paper’ (controlled gauge phase) and ‘on lab’ (uncontrolled gauge phase) spin transformations.