Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Russian Physics Journal

The Hermitian phase operator and the Heisenberg commutation relations

E. V. Damaskinskii, Vladimir Sergeevich Yarunin

Published Jun 1, 1978• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00936683

Related papers

Investigation of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in the Heisenberg picture

Yan-Gang Miao, Zhen-Ming Xu

arXiv:1212.6705•Physics Letters A•Mar 30, 2016•30 citations

The Garrison-Wong quantum phase operator revisited

Jan van Neerven

We revisit the quantum phase operator $Φ$ introduced by Garrison and Wong. Denoting by $N$ the number operator, we provide a detailed proof of the Heisenberg commutation relation $ΦN - NΦ= iI$ on the natural maximal domain $D(ΦN) \cap D(N Φ)$ as well as the failure of the Weyl commutation relations, and discuss some further interesting properties of this pair.

arXiv:2008.08935•Aug 20, 2020•1 citation

Einstein’s E = mc2 Derivable from Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Relations

Sibel Başkal, Young S Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation can be written in terms of the step-up and step-down operators in the harmonic oscillator representation. It is noted that the single-variable Heisenberg commutation relation contains the symmetry of the S p ( 2 ) group which is isomorphic to the Lorentz group applicable to one time-like dimension and two space-like dimensions, known as the O ( 2 , 1 ) group. This group has three independent generators. The one-dimensional step-up and step-down operators can be combined into one two-by-two Hermitian matrix which contains three independent operators. If we use a two-variable Heisenberg commutation relation, the two pairs of independent step-up, step-down operators can be combined into a four-by-four block-diagonal Hermitian matrix with six independent parameters. It is then possible to add one off-diagonal two-by-two matrix and its Hermitian conjugate to complete the four-by-four Hermitian matrix. This off-diagonal matrix has four independent generators. There are thus ten independent generators. It is then shown that these ten generators can be linearly combined to the ten generators for Dirac’s two oscillator system leading to the group isomorphic to the de Sitter group O ( 3 , 2 ) , which can then be contracted to the inhomogeneous Lorentz group with four translation generators corresponding to the four-momentum in the Lorentz-covariant world. This Lorentz-covariant four-momentum is known as Einstein’s E = m c 2 .

arXiv:1911.03818•Quantum Reports•Nov 9, 2019•11 citations

On the Heisenberg commutation relation. I

Konrad Schmüdgen

Journal of Functional Analysis•Jan 1, 1983•70 citations

A Theory of the Relative Phase and Number Difference of Two Quantized Harmonic Oscillators

G. Björk, Jonas S derholm, Alexei S. Trifonov +1 more

We present a comprehensive and self-consistent theory of relative-phase measurements and the associated Hermitian relative-phase operator of two harmonic oscillators. We find that since Nature does not favor any particular initial condition of the two oscillators, the relative-phase operator is not unique. We show that the relative-phase eigenstates are maximally entangled. Therefore, most relative-phase operators lack a classical correspondence, even in the high-excitation limit. Furthermore, we find that the relative phase and the excitation number difference are noncommuting, noncanonical observables and we derive a commutation relation.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 2002•4 citations

Non-Hermitian Heisenberg representation

Miloslav Znojil

arXiv:1505.01036•Physics Letters A•Jun 23, 2015•26 citations
We revisit the quantum phase operator ΦΦΦ introduced by Garrison and Wong. Denoting by NNN the number operator, we provide a detailed proof of the Heisenberg commutation relation ΦN−NΦ=iIΦN - NΦ= iIΦN−NΦ=iI on the natural maximal domain D(ΦN)∩D(NΦ)D(ΦN) \cap D(N Φ)D(ΦN)∩D(NΦ) as well as the failure of the Weyl commutation relations, and discuss some further interesting properties of this pair.
Heisenberg’s uncertainty relation can be written in terms of the step-up and step-down operators in the harmonic oscillator representation. It is noted that the single-variable Heisenberg commutation relation contains the symmetry of the S p ( 2 ) group which is isomorphic to the Lorentz group applicable to one time-like dimension and two space-like dimensions, known as the O ( 2 , 1 ) group. This group has three independent generators. The one-dimensional step-up and step-down operators can be combined into one two-by-two Hermitian matrix which contains three independent operators. If we use a two-variable Heisenberg commutation relation, the two pairs of independent step-up, step-down operators can be combined into a four-by-four block-diagonal Hermitian matrix with six independent parameters. It is then possible to add one off-diagonal two-by-two matrix and its Hermitian conjugate to complete the four-by-four Hermitian matrix. This off-diagonal matrix has four independent generators. There are thus ten independent generators. It is then shown that these ten generators can be linearly combined to the ten generators for Dirac’s two oscillator system leading to the group isomorphic to the de Sitter group O ( 3 , 2 ) , which can then be contracted to the inhomogeneous Lorentz group with four translation generators corresponding to the four-momentum in the Lorentz-covariant world. This Lorentz-covariant four-momentum is known as Einstein’s E = m c 2 .
We present a comprehensive and self-consistent theory of relative-phase measurements and the associated Hermitian relative-phase operator of two harmonic oscillators. We find that since Nature does not favor any particular initial condition of the two oscillators, the relative-phase operator is not unique. We show that the relative-phase eigenstates are maximally entangled. Therefore, most relative-phase operators lack a classical correspondence, even in the high-excitation limit. Furthermore, we find that the relative phase and the excitation number difference are noncommuting, noncanonical observables and we derive a commutation relation.