Relativistic quantum theories are equipped with a background Minkowski spacetime and non‐relativistic quantum theories with a Galilean space‐time. Traditional investigations have distinguished their distinct space‐time structures and have examined ways in which relativistic theories become sufficiently like Galilean theories in a low velocity approximation or limit. A different way to look at their relationship is to see that both kinds of theories are special cases of a certain five‐dimensional generalization involving no limiting procedures or approximations. When one compares them, striking features emerge that bear on philosophical questions, including the ontological status of the wave function and time reversal invariance.
Relativistic quantum theories are equipped with a background Minkowski spacetime and non‐relativistic quantum theories with a Galilean space‐time. Traditional investigations have distinguished their distinct space‐time structures and have examined ways in which relativistic theories become sufficiently like Galilean theories in a low velocity approximation or limit. A different way to look at their relationship is to see that both kinds of theories are special cases of a certain five‐dimensional generalization involving no limiting procedures or approximations. When one compares them, striking features emerge that bear on philosophical questions, including the ontological status of the wave function and time reversal invariance.
Up to this point, our study of quantum mechanics has concerned itself with the behaviour of particles that inhabit a Galilean spacetime. For many purposes, in atomic, molecular and condensed matter physics, this theory is quite adequate. We saw in earlier chapters, however, that our actual spacetime has a structure which is much closer to that of the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity and that more general structures must be considered when gravitational phenomena are significant. From a purely theoretical point of view, it is therefore important to formulate quantum theory in a way which is consistent with these more general spacetimes. The benefits of constructing a relativistic quantum theory actually go far beyond the aesthetic satisfaction of making our geometrical and quantummechanical reasoning compatible. For one thing, we shall discover that the relativistic theory provides a deeper understanding of spin and the distinction between fermions and bosons, which in the non-relativistic theory appear simply as facts of life that we must strive to accommodate. Also, of course, there are many situations in which relativistic effects become observable, for which nonrelativistic theory provides no explanation. The most obvious are high-energy scattering experiments, in which particles acquire kinetic energies comparable with or greater than their rest energies mc2, and the correct 4-momentum (3.34) must be used. There are, however, more subtle effects, such as the spin-orbit coupling that is essential for interpreting atomic spectra, which are also of relativistic origin.
Up to this point, our study of quantum mechanics has concerned itself with the behaviour of particles that inhabit a Galilean spacetime. For many purposes, in atomic, molecular and condensed matter physics, this theory is quite adequate. We saw in earlier chapters, however, that our actual spacetime has a structure which is much closer to that of the Minkowski spacetime of special relativity and that more general structures must be considered when gravitational phenomena are signicant. From a purely theoretical point of view, it is therefore important to formulate quantum theory in a way which is consistent with these more general spacetimes. The benets of constructing a relativistic quantum theory actually go far beyond the aesthetic satisfaction of making our geometrical and quantum-mechanical reasoning compatible. For one thing, we shall discover that the relativistic theory provides a deeper understanding of spin and the distinction between fermions and bosons, which in the non-relativistic theory appear simply as facts of life that we must strive to accommodate. Also, of course, there are many situations in which relativistic eects become observable, for which non-relativistic theory provides no explanation. The most obvious are high-energy scattering experiments, in which particles acquire kinetic energies comparable with or greater than their rest energies mc2, and the correct 4-momentum (3.33) must be used. There are, however, more subtle eects, such as the spin-orbit coupling that is essential for interpreting atomic spectra, which are also of relativistic origin.
What is relativistic quantum theory? How does it differ from non-relativistic quantum mechanics? Is there something more involved than the transition from the Galilean group to the Lorentz group? These questions are evidently of great importance to the understanding of relativistic quantum theory (RQT), in particular to the distinction between the basic principles of quantum theory, and the characterization of a particular class of dynamical evolutions. Within non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) a reasonably precise response is possible (differences concern the number of degrees of freedom, the existence of internal symmetries, and the form of the Hamiltonian as a function of the canonical variables); what appears characteristic of RQT is the appearance of a dynamics of a qualitatively different character (involving the creation and annihilation of particles), involving new kinds of constraints (renormalization theory: anomalies). Nevertheless, it seems we must know how to pass from the inhomogeneous Galilean group (IHGG) to the Lorentz group (IHLG), if only because we have successfully constructed a RQT, surely, then, we know what it is that we hold invariant in this transition.
The implications of the relativistic space-time structure for a physical description by quantum mechanical wave-functions are investigated. On the basis of a detailed analysis of Bell's concept of local causality, which is violated in quantum theory, we argue that this is a subtle, as well as an important effort. A central requirement appearing in relativistic quantum mechanics, namely local commutativity, is analyzed in detail and possible justifications are given and discussed. The complexity of the implications of wave function reduction in connection with Minkowski space-time are illustrated by a quantum mechanical measurement procedure which was proposed by Aharonov and Albert. This procedure and its relativistic implications are explicitly analyzed and discussed in terms of state evolution. This analysis shows that the usual notion of state evolution fails in relativistic quantum theory. Two possible solutions of this problem are given. In particular, it is shown that also a theory with a distinguished foliation of space-time into space-like leafs - accounting for nonlocality - makes the right predictions for the Aharonov-Albert experiment. We will repeatedly encounter that an analysis of the wave-function alone does not suffice to answer the question of relativistic compatibility of the theory, but that the actual events in space time, which are predicted and described by the theory, are crucial. Relativistic versions of quantum mechanical theories which precisely describe actual processes in space-time are briefly described and discussed in the appendix.
The theories of special relativity and quantum mechanics both rely on continuous rotation groups to describe physical systems, yet one is formulated on a real spacetime manifold while the other employs a complex Hilbert space. This work investigates whether this distinction may arise from the treatment of time itself. By examining the consequences of describing a relativistic system using a single global time parameter, we explore whether such a description naturally requires a mathematical structure capable of encoding observer-dependent proper times as complex phase information. Within this framework, quantum superposition is investigated as a possible coordinate-level representation of unresolved relativistic frame assignments, while wavefunction collapse is conceptualised as the physical resolution of this ambiguity through interaction. exploring whether aspects of the quantum formalism may be understood as consequences of describing the invariant structure of Minkowski spacetime from a local perspective using a rigid notion of time.
A body of theory is completely different between relativity theory and quantum mechanics. Most targeting physical phenomena are different between them as well. Despite that both theories describe our time-space world, no one has succeeded in arriving at one of these theories by using the other one, deductively. Fusion of these two theories produced quantum field theory. However this theory impresses us as a theory that was made by merging the two theories by force. So this theory cannot indicate the reason why both relativity theory and quantum mechanics exist in this world at the same time. Here I show you that quantum mechanics can be led by the equation of Minkowski's metrics, which stands up in the relativistic world of space and time. This is the first report proving mathematically that quantum mechanics can be born reductively in our relativistic world.