The accuracy of total electronic energies obtained using the fixed-node diffusion quantum Monte Carlo (FN-DMC) method is determined by the choice of the many-body nodal surface. Here, we perform a systematic comparison of the quality of FN-DMC energies for a selection of atoms and diatomic molecules using nodal surfaces defined by single determinants of Hartree-Fock, B3LYP, and LDA orbitals. Through comparison with experimental results, we show that the use of Kohn-Sham orbitals results in significantly improved FN-DMC atomization energies over those obtained using Hartree-Fock orbitals. We also discuss the effect of spin contamination in the orbitals.
The accuracy of total electronic energies obtained using the fixed-node diffusion quantum Monte Carlo (FN-DMC) method is determined by the choice of the many-body nodal surface. Here, we perform a systematic comparison of the quality of FN-DMC energies for a selection of atoms and diatomic molecules using nodal surfaces defined by single determinants of Hartree-Fock, B3LYP, and LDA orbitals. Through comparison with experimental results, we show that the use of Kohn-Sham orbitals results in significantly improved FN-DMC atomization energies over those obtained using Hartree-Fock orbitals. We also discuss the effect of spin contamination in the orbitals.
Performance of the fixed-node diffusion quantum Monte Carlo method (FN-DMC) with a single Slater-Jastrow trial wavefunction using natural orbitals (NOs) from MP2, CCSD, CCSD(T), and CASSCF as well as density functional theory orbitals on atomization energies of the molecules in the Gaussian-2 set is investigated in this work. The effects of spin contamination and pseudopotentials (PPs) are also studied. Our results show that the DMC energy with NOs from MP2 or CCSD(T) is the lowest on average, whereas that from CASSCF is only lower than the DMC energy using Hartree-Fock orbitals. Atomization energies are generally underestimated with DMC, and mean absolute deviations of DMC atomization energies are about 2.8 kcal/mol with NOs from MP2 or CCSD(T) and about 2.7 kcal/mol with NOs from CASSCF or B3LYP orbitals. The better performance of the latter two orbitals is due to a more effective error cancellation. The accuracy of the present FN-DMC is similar to CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ on atomization energies. In addition, the error of DMC atomization energies tends to be larger for molecules with multiple bonds. DMC energies of the open-shell systems with spin-restricted orbitals are generally higher than those with spin-unrestricted orbitals if spin contamination is not serious and the atomization energies are improved to some extent. Furthermore, our results indicate that the error of the PPs is rather small at the CCSD(T) level, but could be more pronounced in DMC calculations and DMC atomization energies are improved with some newly developed PPs.
Fixed node diffusion Monte Carlo (FN-DMC) atomization energies are calculated for a benchmark set of 55 molecules. Using single determinant trial wave functions, comparison with experiment yields an average absolute deviation of 2.9 kcal/mol, placing this simplest form of FN-DMC roughly at the same level of accuracy as the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ method. However, unlike perturbative wave function expansion approaches, FN-DMC is applicable to systems containing thousands of valence electrons. For the P2 molecule, a number of possible sources of error are explored in detail. Results show that the main error is due to the fixed-node approximation and that this can be improved significantly with multireference trial wave functions.
This work investigates the accuracy of real-space quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods for calculating molecular geometries. We present the equilibrium bond lengths of a test set of 30 diatomic molecules calculated using variational Monte Carlo (VMC) and diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) methods. The effect of different trial wavefunctions is investigated using single determinants constructed from Hartree-Fock (HF) and Density Functional Theory (DFT) orbitals with LDA, PBE, and B3LYP functionals, as well as small multi-configurational self-consistent field (MCSCF) multi-determinant expansions. When compared to experimental geometries, all DMC methods exhibit smaller mean-absolute deviations (MADs) than those given by HF, DFT, and MCSCF. The most accurate MAD of 3 ± 2 × 10(-3) Å is achieved using DMC with a small multi-determinant expansion. However, the more computationally efficient multi-determinant VMC method has a similar MAD of only 4.0 ± 0.9 × 10(-3) Å, suggesting that QMC forces calculated from the relatively simple VMC algorithm may often be sufficient for accurate molecular geometries.
Quantum chemistry is a useful tool that provides insight into the properties and behavior of chemical systems. Modern software packages have made quantum chemistry methods more easily accessible, and the continued increase in available computational resources has allowed them to be applied to larger systems at higher levels of theory. Two significant problems that the field faces are the high computational complexity of high-level methods and the shift toward parallelism in high performance computing architectures. This work examines the treatment of weakly interacting molecular systems with the fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) method. DMC and other quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) methods offer a possible solution to both of the aforementioned problems: they can produce near-exact results with a lower scaling (with respect to problem size) than other similarly-accurate methods, and they are inherently parallel, so there is little additional cost associated with distributing the work of a single QMC calculation across a large number of processing units. The only error in DMC that is not systematically improvable is the constraint of a fixed nodal surface of the many-particle wave function of the system being studied. There are many cases in which a single Slater determinant trial function is sufficient to obtain accurate results, but there are others in which more sophisticated multi-determinant trial functions are necessary. Furthermore, it is non-trivial to generate nodal surfaces of similar quality for isolated and interacting molecules, so cancellation of errors is not guaranteed. We examine the use of different single- and multi-determinant trial functions in DMC calculations on small chemical systems with the goal of further understanding how to construct appropriate trial functions for molecules and clusters.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Diffusion Monte Carlo (DMC) is an exact technique to project out the ground state (GS) of a Hamiltonian. Since the GS is always bosonic, in Fermionic systems, the projection needs to be carried out while imposing antisymmetric constraints, which is a nondeterministic polynomial hard problem. In practice, therefore, the application of DMC on electronic structure problems is made by employing the fixed-node (FN) approximation, consisting of performing DMC with the constraint of having a fixed, predefined nodal surface. How do we get the nodal surface? The typical approach, applied in systems having up to hundreds or even thousands of electrons, is to obtain the nodal surface from a preliminary mean-field approach (typically, a density functional theory calculation) used to obtain a single Slater determinant. This is known as single reference. In this paper, we propose a new approach, applicable to systems as large as the C 60 fullerene, which improves the nodes by going beyond the single reference. In practice, we employ an implicitly multireference ansatz (antisymmetrized geminal power wave function constraint with molecular orbitals), initialized on the preliminary mean-field approach, which is relaxed by optimizing a few parameters of the wave function determining the nodal surface by minimizing the FN-DMC energy. We highlight the improvements of the proposed approach over the standard single-reference method on several examples and, where feasible, the computational gain over the standard multireference ansatz, which makes the methods applicable to large systems. We also show that physical properties relying on relative energies, such as binding energies, are affordable and reliable within the proposed scheme.
Abstract In this paper Grossman reported pseudopotential fixed-node diffusion QMC calculations of atomization energies for the Gl set of 55 small molecules,0 a standard benchmark set for testing methods in quantum chemistry. To maintain the uniformity in the calculations, they were carried out with the same basis sets and orbital types for single-determinant trial functions and effective core potentials (with a few exceptions). Variational QMC was used to optimize the determinan Jastrow trial functions. The mean absolute deviation EMAD in atomization energy from the experimental values was found to be 2.9 kcal/mol, the maximum deviation was 14 kcal/mol (for SO2), and the next five largest deviations were 7-8 kcal/mol. A comparison with results from other methods tested with the Gl set shows the FN-DQMC method to be competitive. For EMAD the list is: FN-DQMC, 2.9 kcal/mol; DFT (LDA), 40 kcal/mol; DFT (B3LYP or B3PW91), 2.9 kcal/mol; CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVQZ, 2.8 kcal/mol; CCSD(T)/extrapolated, 1.3 kcal/mol; semi-empirical G1 theory, 1.6 kcal/mol. Additional calculations with different trial functions indicated that node location errors could be significantly reduced with multi determinant trial functions. Computational effort was not compared, but linear scaling for FN-DQMC was mentioned as an important advantage for QMC. 0J. A. Pople, M. Head-Gordon, D. J. Fox, K. Raghavachari, and L. A. Curtiss, Gaussian-I theory - A general procedure for prediction of molecular energies, J. Chem. Phys. 90, 5622 (1989).