Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Relativity and Quantum Mechanics—Conflict or Peaceful Coexistence?

Michael L. G. Redhead

Published Dec 1, 1986• 21 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12405.x

Related papers

On a generalized peaceful coexistence of special relativity and quantum mechanics

R. Srikanth

Physics Letters A•Dec 1, 2001•13 citations

The Basic Conflict Between the Concepts of General Relativity and of Quantum Mechanics

Eugene Paul Wigner

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1997•7 citations

On the edge of a paradigm shift: Quantum nonlocality and the breakdown of peaceful coexistence

Kent A. Peacock

I present a thought experiment in quantum mechanics and tease out some of its implications for the doctrine of “peaceful coexistence”, which, following Shimony, I take to be the proposition that quantum mechanics does not force us to revise or abandon the relativistic picture of causality. I criticize the standard arguments in favour of peaceful coexistence on the grounds that they are question‐begging, and suggest that the breakdown of Lorentz‐invariant relativity as a principle theory would be a natural development, given the general trend of physics in this century.

International Studies in the Philosophy of Science•Jul 1, 1998•10 citations

Relativity and quantum mechanics

Hüseyin Yilmaz

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Feb 1, 1984•0 citations

Thermality versus Objectivity: Can They Peacefully Coexist?

Thao P. Le, Andreas Winter, Gerardo Adesso

Under the influence of external environments, quantum systems can undergo various different processes, including decoherence and equilibration. We observe that macroscopic objects are both objective and thermal, thus leading to the expectation that both objectivity and thermalisation can peacefully coexist on the quantum regime too. Crucially, however, objectivity relies on distributed classical information that could conflict with thermalisation. Here, we examine the overlap between thermal and objective states. We find that in general, one cannot exist when the other is present. However, there are certain regimes where thermality and objectivity are more likely to coexist: in the high temperature limit, at the non-degenerate low temperature limit, and when the environment is large. This is consistent with our experiences that everyday-sized objects can be both thermal and objective.

arXiv:2109.13265•Entropy•Nov 13, 2021•10 citations

RELATIVITY AND QUANTUM MECHANICS

James Tan

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
I present a thought experiment in quantum mechanics and tease out some of its implications for the doctrine of “peaceful coexistence”, which, following Shimony, I take to be the proposition that quantum mechanics does not force us to revise or abandon the relativistic picture of causality. I criticize the standard arguments in favour of peaceful coexistence on the grounds that they are question‐begging, and suggest that the breakdown of Lorentz‐invariant relativity as a principle theory would be a natural development, given the general trend of physics in this century.
Under the influence of external environments, quantum systems can undergo various different processes, including decoherence and equilibration. We observe that macroscopic objects are both objective and thermal, thus leading to the expectation that both objectivity and thermalisation can peacefully coexist on the quantum regime too. Crucially, however, objectivity relies on distributed classical information that could conflict with thermalisation. Here, we examine the overlap between thermal and objective states. We find that in general, one cannot exist when the other is present. However, there are certain regimes where thermality and objectivity are more likely to coexist: in the high temperature limit, at the non-degenerate low temperature limit, and when the environment is large. This is consistent with our experiences that everyday-sized objects can be both thermal and objective.