It is shown that a Hermitian phase operator exists for quantum spins. Its spectrum is not continuous but has the values (2 pi /(2S+1))n, 0<or=n<or=2S for spin S. The precession of a high-S spin in a magnetic field is shown to consist essentially of a set of jumps from one value of phase to the next one, at equal time intervals. At intermediate times the value of the phase is uncertain. By going to a larger Hilbert space than the spin space, a Hermitian phase operator whose eigenvalue spectrum covers the entire real line is defined, and its relation to the formerly defined operator is clarified. Possible applications to spin and other systems are outlined.
It is shown that a Hermitian phase operator exists for quantum spins. Its spectrum is not continuous but has the values (2 pi /(2S+1))n, 0<or=n<or=2S for spin S. The precession of a high-S spin in a magnetic field is shown to consist essentially of a set of jumps from one value of phase to the next one, at equal time intervals. At intermediate times the value of the phase is uncertain. By going to a larger Hilbert space than the spin space, a Hermitian phase operator whose eigenvalue spectrum covers the entire real line is defined, and its relation to the formerly defined operator is clarified. Possible applications to spin and other systems are outlined.
More particularly, the sets {|n〉 : n = 0, 1, · · · s} and {|θm〉 : m = 0, 1, · · · s} are two mutually unbiased bases for s as |〈n|θm〉|2 = 1/(s + 1) for n, m = 0, 1, · · · , s. The exponential phase operator is defined in terms of the phase state basis as ei φˆθ = s∑ m=0 eiθm |θm〉〈θm|, (2.4) or equivalently, in terms of the energy eigenstates as |n〉〈n + 1| + ei(s+1)θ0 |s〉〈0|. (2.5) The subscript θ serves as a reminder that the values of phase variable θm lie in the range from θ0 to θ0 + 2π . This construction ensures that the phase states are the eigenstates of ei φˆθ , i.e., ei φˆθ |θm〉 = eiθm |θm〉. (2.6) The exponential phase operator is unitary, because n=0 |n〉〈n| = 1ˆ s (2.7) where 1ˆ s is the identity operator on s . The Hermitian phase operator representing the phase angle itself was introduced in (Pegg and Barnett 1988b Paper 2.2) and (Barnett and Pegg 1989 Paper 2.3) as simply φˆθ = s∑ m=0 θm|θm〉〈θm|. (2.8) The operator on the left hand sides of Eqs. (2.4) and (2.5) is the exponential of i φˆθ .Moreover, the operator corresponding to an arbitrary function of the phase angle f (θ) was introduced in Barnett and Pegg (1992 Paper 3.3) and also discussed in Pegg and Barnett (1997a Paper 2.6) as f (φˆθ ) = s∑ m=0 f (θm)|θm〉〈θm|. (2.9) It follows that the Hermitian conjugate of ei φˆθ is the operator (ei φˆθ )† = s∑ m=0 e−iθm |θm〉〈θm| = e−i φˆθ . (2.10) This construction on the finite dimensional spaces elegantly sidesteps the problems faced with the infinite dimensional Hilbert space discussed in the previous chapter. Its simplicity is particularly appealing. The question remains, however, of how to deal with states such as | f 〉 = ∑∞n=0 cn|n〉 which reside in the infinite dimensional Hilbert space. For each value of s, there exists a phase operator defined on s ; this leads naturally to sequences of operators, such as e.g. φˆθ |s=S, φˆθ |s=S+1, φˆθ |s=S+2 · · · which are phase angle operators defined on the sequence of spaces S, S+1, S+2, · · · for arbitrarily large integer S. The space s contains a state | f 〉s which approximates | f 〉 to arbitrary precision for a sufficiently large value of s, such that the modulus of the overlap 〈 f | f 〉s is as close to unity as desired. Thus the issue of including states such as | f 〉 entails dealing with such sequences as s tends to infinity.
It is shown that there exist two kinds of operational (or measured) phase operators, those of the Hradil type [Phys. Rev. A 47 (1993), 4532], defined on the entire Hilbert space, and those of the Noh-Fougères-Mandel type [Phys. Rev. A 45 (1992), 424], defined only on a subspace. As a consequence, strictly speaking, the Noh-Fougères-Mandel measured phase cannot be defined in the case of, for example, coherent states, squeezed states and the vacuum. The difference between these operators is made clear by using the concept of the Bargmann distance between a quantum state and its “reduced” state. Since Noh et al. did not use the correct variances of the Susskind-Glogower and Pegg-Barnett phase operators when they compared their data with the results predicted through use of these operators, the correct expressions in that case are presented. Comparing the measured operators with the Hermitian phase operator in the extended Susskind-Glogower formalism, we show that the quantum phase given by the Hermitian phase operator is more appropriate than the measured phases. The variance of the Hermitian operator in the vacuum is consistent with the complementarity of the photon number and phase, which implies that the vacuum has a uniform phase distribution. Hradil's measured operator does not have such a property. Although the Noh-Fougères-Mandel operator has such a property in a particular limit, this operator does not represent, in principle, a meaningful measure of the phase measurement in a typical quantum region, because the Bargmann distance becomes large in such a region.
In this work we will advance farther along a line previously developed concerning our proposal of a time interval operator, on finite dimensional spaces. The time interval operator is Hermitian, and its eigenvalues are time values with a precise and interesting role on the dynamics. With the help of the Discrete Phase Space Formalism (DPSF) previously developed, we show that the time interval operator is the complementary pair of the Hamiltonian. From that, a simple system is proposed as a quantum clock. The only restriction is that our results do not apply to all possible Hamiltonians.
Relative phase is treated as a physical quantity for two mode systems in quantum atom optics, adapting the Pegg-Barnett treatment of quantum optical phase to define a linear Hermitian relative phase operator via first introducing a complete orthonormal set of relative phase eigenstates. These states are contrasted with other so-called phase states. Other approaches to treating phase and previous attempts to find a Hermitian phase operator are discussed. The relative phase eigenstate has maximal two mode entanglement, it is a fragmented state with its Bloch vector lying inside the Bloch sphere and is highly spin squeezed. The relative phase states are applied to describing interferometry experiments with Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC), particularly in the context of a proposed Heisenberg limited interferometry experiment. For a relative phase eigenstate the fractional fluctuation in one spin operator component perpendicular to the Bloch vector is essentially only of order 1/N, so if such a highly spin squeezed state could be prepared it may be useful for Heisenberg limited interferometry. An approach for preparing a BEC in a state close to a relative phase state is suggested, based on adiabatically changing parameters in the Josephson Hamiltonian starting from a suitable energy eigenstate in the Rabi regime.
Utilising the intimate connection of a charged particle in a homogeneous magnetic field to that of a harmonic oscillator, the authors demonstrate explicitly that the eigenvalue spectrum for the matrix operator S. pi for arbitrary spin in a uniform magnetic field in the z direction is governed, for its discrete part, by that of a Hermitian matrix defined on the space of the particle number and spin operators and is thus constrained to be real for any intensity of the external magnetic field. The present analysis generalises to arbitrary spin their previously reported results applied to the case of a spin-1 particle.
The difficulties in formulating a natural and simple operator description of the phase of a quantum oscillator or single-mode electromagnetic field have been known for some time. We present a unitary phase operator whose eigenstates are well-defined phase states and whose properties coincide with those normally associated with a phase. The corresponding phase eigenvalues form only a dense subset of the real numbers. A natural extension to the definition of a time-measurement operator yields a corresponding countable infinity of eigenvalues.