A second order approximation to the solution of the HF equations is investigated, with the purpose of obtaining good starting points for iterative many-body treatments. The approach is illustrated with reference to SU(2) and SU(3) models, yielding excellent results.
Waveguide Quantum Electrodynamics (WQED) offers a suitable stage for controlling the interaction of light with atoms, allowing for collective phenomena such as super- and subradiance. In a chiral waveguide setup, the quantum state evolves through all the Hilbert space, rendering an exact theoretical treatment exponentially hard and unobtained to date for more than ∼20 atoms. In this work, we use a computationally efficient higher order mean-field approximation to model the radiation dynamics in a chirally coupled array of atoms, showing good agreement with recent experimental results. Further, based on a perturbative approximation of the full dynamics, we develop an analytical solution that captures photon statistics for a moderate atom number, N, and a homogeneous atom-waveguide coupling, β. Finally, we show that capturing the onset of second-order coherence from a fully inverted state requires a fourth-order mean-field approximation, as lower-order treatments fail to account for the necessary four-body correlations. These results illustrate the complex behavior of a symmetry-lacking system, and the methods discussed here provide systematic analytical solutions to which semi-classical methods such as the cumulant expansion or the truncated Wigner approximation can be benchmarked.
The exactly soluble model, originally considered by Moshinsky, consisting of two spin-1/2 particles interacting through harmonic-oscillator forces and moving in a common harmonic-oscillator potential is extended to include the effects of an external electric field. We solve for the energy exactly, exactly in the Hartree–Fock approximation, and also compare to the results of Hartree–Fock perturbation theory. We find that the Hartree–Fock method yields the same result for the electric polarizability as the exact solution even though the field-independent part of the energy is not the same. However, when second-order Hartree–Fock perturbation theory is employed, the results for the polarizability can be substantially in error. Similar results obtain for the calculation of the matrix element for optical absorption in the dipole approximation.