Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Real and hybrid atomic orbitals

David B. Cook, Patrick William Fowler

Published Sep 1, 1981• 12 citations
Publisher

Abstract

It is shown that the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogenlike atom separates in both spheroconal and prolate spheroidal coordinates and that these separations provide a sound theoretical basis for the real and hybrid atomic orbitals. Thus the real and hybrid atomic orbitals have as sound a pedigree as the more familiar complex orbitals based on the separation of the Schrödinger equation in spherical polar coordinates.

DOI
10.1119/1.12383

Related papers

The hydrogen atom: wave mechanics beyond Schroedinger; orbitals as algebraic formulae derived in all four coordinate systems

John F. Ogilvie

Chemists are aware of the solution of Schroedinger's equations for the hydrogen atom in only spherical polar coordinates, but the spatial variables are separable also in three other systems - - paraboloidal, ellipsoidal and spheroconical; we report here explicit algebraic solutions directly derived in ellipsoidal and spheroconical coordinates for the first time. Our solutions progress from those previously known in spherical polar but not entirely understood, through those little known in paraboloidal, to those in systems of ellipsoidal and spheroconical coordinates unknown before the present work. Applications of these solutions include angular momenta, a quantitative calculation of the discrete absorption spectrum and accurate plots of surfaces of amplitude functions. The shape of a surface of a particular amplitude function, and even the quantum numbers in a particular set to specify such an individual function, depend on a particular chosen system of coordinates, and are therefore artefacts of that coordinate representation within wave mechanics; a choice of a coordinate system to discuss atomic or molecular properties based on the shapes of amplitude functions or their respective quantum numbers is hence arbitrary

•Jun 20, 2017•2 citations

The hydrogen atom according to wave mechanics, parts I, II, III, IV, V

John F. Ogilvie

Based on an exposition of the underlying physics and applied mathematics in arXiv:1603.00899, this paper in five separate parts presents a description of the properties of the amplitude functions of the hydrogen atom according to wave mechanics in the coordinate representation in all four systems of coordinates in which Schroedinger's equations are separable, explicitly I spherical polar coordinates, II paraboloidal coordinates, III ellipsoidal coordinates and IV spheroconical coordinates; part V discusses the implications of these multiple systems in which these atomic orbitals can be directly calculated. Most published plots of orbitals are inaccurate. In particular, parts I - IV contain many accurate plots of the surfaces of amplitude functions in the various systems with a common criterion for the amplitude at which the surface is constructed. Although the plots are generated from amplitude functions in the specified systems of coordinates, the plots are translated to cartesian coordinates that the eye can recognise. The surfaces of the amplitude functions in ellipsoidal and spheroconical functions are previously unreported, with the accurate surfaces in spherical polar and paraboloidal coordinates for a direct comparison.

arXiv:1612.05098•Nov 29, 2016•0 citations

Hidden symmetry and explicit spheroidal eigenfunctions of the hydrogen atom

Stella M. Sung, Dudley R. Herschbach

The Schrödinger equation for a hydrogenic atom is separable in prolate spheroidal coordinates, as a consequence of the ‘‘hidden symmetry’’ stemming from the fixed spatial orientation of the classical Kepler orbits. One focus is at the nucleus and the other a distance R away along the major axis of the elliptic orbit. The separation constant α is not an elementary function of Z or R or quantum numbers. However, for given principal quantum number n and angular momentum projection m, the allowed values of α and corresponding eigenfunctions in spheroidal coordinates are readily obtained from a secular equation of order n−m. We evaluate α(n,m;ZR) and the coefficients gl(α) that specify the spheroidal eigenfunctions as hybrids of the familiar ‖nlm〉 hydrogen-atom states with fixed n and m but different l values. Explicit formulas and plots are given for α and gl and for the probability distributions derived from the hybrid wave functions, ∑lgl(α)‖nlm〉, for all states up through n=4. In the limit R→∞ these hybrids become the solutions in parabolic coordinates, determined simply by geometrical Clebsch–Gordan coefficients that account for conservation of angular momentum and the hidden symmetry. We also briefly discuss some applications of the spheroidal eigenfunctions, particularly to exact analytic solutions of two-center molecular orbitals for special values of R and the nuclear charge ratio Za/Zb.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 15, 1991•21 citations

Hydrogen-like Atomic Wavefunctions: A First Sketch

Jochen Autschbach

Abstract This chapter reiterates the quantum numbers for atomic orbitals, known from general chemistry, and places them into the context developed so far. It is sketched how the Schrodinger equation (SE) for the hydrogen atom hydrogen-like systems (one electron plus a nucleus of charge Z) is set up. When the nucleus is treated as a fixed point charge, the SE is only for the electron. The solutions of the SE can be obtained by switching to spherical polar coordinates, such that the variables are separable in terms of the electron distance from the nucleus, r, and two angles. The kinetic energy of the electron then has a radial component, and an angular component. The latter is associated with the angular momentum quantum number, which is codified by the letters s, p, d, f, and so forth. A step by step solution of the SE is provided later, in chapter 19.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Dec 21, 2020•0 citations

The hydrogen atom

P. Anthony Cox

This chapter focuses on the hydrogen atom, which is the most important chemical application of the quantum theory. The hydrogen atom was Erwin Schrödinger's immediate goal when he developed his equation, and the solution obtained in 1926 persuaded him and indeed most interested physicists that his theory was successful. Indeed, the solutions of Schrödinger's equation — known as atomic orbitals — form the basis of our understanding, not only of atomic structure, but also of chemical bonding in molecules and solids. The chapter begins by considering the Rutherford–Bohr atom. It then looks at hydrogenic ions. The solutions described in the chapter are 'exact', in the mathematical sense that they can be obtained from the Schrödinger's equation without approximation. However, they are not quite 'correct', because this equation does not truly describe a real hydrogen atom.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Jan 25, 1996•0 citations

The quantum states for Hydrogen atom: spherical harmonics and the orbitals geometrical representation

D. R. Constantin, Liliana Preda, AGNETA A. MOCANU +3 more

Our work utilizes the quantum model of the hydrogen atom which is based on the Schrödinger equation with Coulomb potential. Specifically, we concentrate on the angular components of the wave eigenfunctions derived from this model. We consider the quantum states with n ≤ 4. In order to visualize the orbital shapes of these states, we built in the spherical coordinates system their 3D geometric representations. Furthermore, we use the corresponding spherical harmonics, to calculate the θ nodal values that describe the configurations of these orbital states.

INCAS BULLETIN•Mar 11, 2024•2 citations
It is shown that the Schrödinger equation for the hydrogenlike atom separates in both spheroconal and prolate spheroidal coordinates and that these separations provide a sound theoretical basis for the real and hybrid atomic orbitals. Thus the real and hybrid atomic orbitals have as sound a pedigree as the more familiar complex orbitals based on the separation of the Schrödinger equation in spherical polar coordinates.
Chemists are aware of the solution of Schroedinger's equations for the hydrogen atom in only spherical polar coordinates, but the spatial variables are separable also in three other systems - - paraboloidal, ellipsoidal and spheroconical; we report here explicit algebraic solutions directly derived in ellipsoidal and spheroconical coordinates for the first time. Our solutions progress from those previously known in spherical polar but not entirely understood, through those little known in paraboloidal, to those in systems of ellipsoidal and spheroconical coordinates unknown before the present work. Applications of these solutions include angular momenta, a quantitative calculation of the discrete absorption spectrum and accurate plots of surfaces of amplitude functions. The shape of a surface of a particular amplitude function, and even the quantum numbers in a particular set to specify such an individual function, depend on a particular chosen system of coordinates, and are therefore artefacts of that coordinate representation within wave mechanics; a choice of a coordinate system to discuss atomic or molecular properties based on the shapes of amplitude functions or their respective quantum numbers is hence arbitrary
Based on an exposition of the underlying physics and applied mathematics in arXiv:1603.00899, this paper in five separate parts presents a description of the properties of the amplitude functions of the hydrogen atom according to wave mechanics in the coordinate representation in all four systems of coordinates in which Schroedinger's equations are separable, explicitly I spherical polar coordinates, II paraboloidal coordinates, III ellipsoidal coordinates and IV spheroconical coordinates; part V discusses the implications of these multiple systems in which these atomic orbitals can be directly calculated. Most published plots of orbitals are inaccurate. In particular, parts I - IV contain many accurate plots of the surfaces of amplitude functions in the various systems with a common criterion for the amplitude at which the surface is constructed. Although the plots are generated from amplitude functions in the specified systems of coordinates, the plots are translated to cartesian coordinates that the eye can recognise. The surfaces of the amplitude functions in ellipsoidal and spheroconical functions are previously unreported, with the accurate surfaces in spherical polar and paraboloidal coordinates for a direct comparison.
The Schrödinger equation for a hydrogenic atom is separable in prolate spheroidal coordinates, as a consequence of the ‘‘hidden symmetry’’ stemming from the fixed spatial orientation of the classical Kepler orbits. One focus is at the nucleus and the other a distance R away along the major axis of the elliptic orbit. The separation constant α is not an elementary function of Z or R or quantum numbers. However, for given principal quantum number n and angular momentum projection m, the allowed values of α and corresponding eigenfunctions in spheroidal coordinates are readily obtained from a secular equation of order n−m. We evaluate α(n,m;ZR) and the coefficients gl(α) that specify the spheroidal eigenfunctions as hybrids of the familiar ‖nlm〉 hydrogen-atom states with fixed n and m but different l values. Explicit formulas and plots are given for α and gl and for the probability distributions derived from the hybrid wave functions, ∑lgl(α)‖nlm〉, for all states up through n=4. In the limit R→∞ these hybrids become the solutions in parabolic coordinates, determined simply by geometrical Clebsch–Gordan coefficients that account for conservation of angular momentum and the hidden symmetry. We also briefly discuss some applications of the spheroidal eigenfunctions, particularly to exact analytic solutions of two-center molecular orbitals for special values of R and the nuclear charge ratio Za/Zb.
Abstract This chapter reiterates the quantum numbers for atomic orbitals, known from general chemistry, and places them into the context developed so far. It is sketched how the Schrodinger equation (SE) for the hydrogen atom hydrogen-like systems (one electron plus a nucleus of charge Z) is set up. When the nucleus is treated as a fixed point charge, the SE is only for the electron. The solutions of the SE can be obtained by switching to spherical polar coordinates, such that the variables are separable in terms of the electron distance from the nucleus, r, and two angles. The kinetic energy of the electron then has a radial component, and an angular component. The latter is associated with the angular momentum quantum number, which is codified by the letters s, p, d, f, and so forth. A step by step solution of the SE is provided later, in chapter 19.
This chapter focuses on the hydrogen atom, which is the most important chemical application of the quantum theory. The hydrogen atom was Erwin Schrödinger's immediate goal when he developed his equation, and the solution obtained in 1926 persuaded him and indeed most interested physicists that his theory was successful. Indeed, the solutions of Schrödinger's equation — known as atomic orbitals — form the basis of our understanding, not only of atomic structure, but also of chemical bonding in molecules and solids. The chapter begins by considering the Rutherford–Bohr atom. It then looks at hydrogenic ions. The solutions described in the chapter are 'exact', in the mathematical sense that they can be obtained from the Schrödinger's equation without approximation. However, they are not quite 'correct', because this equation does not truly describe a real hydrogen atom.
Our work utilizes the quantum model of the hydrogen atom which is based on the Schrödinger equation with Coulomb potential. Specifically, we concentrate on the angular components of the wave eigenfunctions derived from this model. We consider the quantum states with n ≤ 4. In order to visualize the orbital shapes of these states, we built in the spherical coordinates system their 3D geometric representations. Furthermore, we use the corresponding spherical harmonics, to calculate the θ nodal values that describe the configurations of these orbital states.