A Relativity Paradox

Herbert Dingle

Francis W. Sears

Viktor Schatz

We discovered a relativistic Photon-Atom-Energy paradox of Special Relativity and a de Broglie wavelengths energy paradox of Special Relativity, which are two different problems, but assumed to be of same reason. Any try to explain using Special or General Relativity failed till now. We invite every one to get involved in our discovery and to try to solve this problems, which seems to be of a very deeply principle. Also we cite our unite solution of both paradoxes.

David Finkelstein

F. J. Duarte

The ‘EPR paradox’ is directly related to the 1935 paper of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, even though Einstein did not include the word ‘paradox’ in it. All Einstein and his co authors did was to construct an argument that concluded that quantum mechanics was ‘not complete.’ This EPR conclusion is examined in detail here and found to be based on the erroneous assumption of an ‘all values’ spread in x that leads to an unphysical exact measurement of the momentum p . The word paradox, in relation the second part of the EPR paper, was introduced by Schrödinger in 1936 and popularized by Bohm in the 1950s. Hence, we should not attach responsibility to EPR for the ‘paradox’ situation. It was Schrödinger and Bohm who attached and propagated the term paradox in relation to the EPR paper. And the literature made it famous. This is particularly lamentable since the physics of quantum entanglement is utterly free of paradoxes .

Justin Lee

This paper uses the special theory of relativity to introduce a novel solution to EinsteinPodolskyRosen paradox.More specically, the faster-than-light communication is described to explain two types of EPR paradox experiments: photon polarization and electronpositron pair spins.Most importantly, this paper explains why this faster-than-light communication does not violate the special theory of relativity.