The power of quantum computation derives from algorithmic methods that exploit the availability of quantum superposition and entanglement to perform computations that are intractable with classical devices. The race is on to develop hardware that will unleash the promise of quantum algorithms. A handful of different types of hardware are currently being developed with the greatest efforts directed at superconducting, quantum-dot, trapped-ion, photonic, and neutral-atom approaches [1]. While all approaches have strengths and weaknesses, and are at different stages of development, the challenge of creating a practical design that can be scaled to a million or more qubits has not yet been met with any of the existing platforms. One may wonder if we really need a million qubits for a useful quantum computer. The answer depends on our ambition level. On the one hand it is widely believed that a quantum computer with less than 100 reliable qubits will be able to demonstrate a quantum advantage for a well defined computational problem [2]. Demonstration of a quantum computational advantage will generate great excitement in the halls of academia, but will have little broader import. A problem of great practical interest such as ab initio design of chemicals for increasing the yield of fertilizers for crop production, to name but one example, may also require just a few hundred qubits, provided computational sequences with circuit depth of 1010 or more operations can be reliably performed [3]. However, given the current performance of qubit hardware, which has demonstrated error rates not less than ∼10−3, computations with depth 1010 will only produce random outcomes of negligible value. The solution lies in the construction of error-correction circuitry operating on logical qubits, each composed of many physical qubits, which will enable logical error rates many orders of magnitude smaller than physical error rates. Although error correction is remarkably efficient for classical computing devices—Hamming codes detect and correct errors while only requiring roughly 10% overhead in the number of physical bits—quantum error correction is notoriously expensive. New approaches to error correction are the subject of intensive research with one promising direction being the development of codes that are optimized to suppress the dominant error mechanism in a particular physical platform [4,5]. Nevertheless, with physical error rates of 10−4, a plausible target for current qubit systems, the overhead required to reach logical error rates of 10−10 may be measured in thousands of physical qubits for each logical qubit. Thus a quantum computer able to perform deep calculations on a few hundred logical qubits could require a million physical qubits. A consequence of the cost of quantum error correction is that any viable approach to large-scale quantum computing needs to combine high-fidelity quantum logic operations with a capability for integrating large numbers of physical qubits. From this perspective neutral-atom qubits appear particularly promising [6] as they have already demonstrated control of more qubits than any other platform with recent experiments in 1D [7], 2D [8,9], and 3D [10] geometries showing control of up to 50 atomic qubits. Large qubit arrays can potentially be prepared in 1D, 2D, or 3D geometries. The number of proximal qubits increases with the dimensionality, which is advantageous for implementation of error correction code words, and points towards a preference for 2D or 3D arrays. On the other hand, the added overhead of compensating crosstalk incurred when targeting atoms inside a 3D volume makes parallel operations on multiple qubits challenging. A 2D geometry, as shown schematically in Fig. 1, may be an optimal choice since qubit control and measurement can be performed with lasers propagating normal to the plane of the array so that individual qubit sites can be addressed independently. With demonstrated array periods of a few micrometers we require a footprint of less than 1 mm2 for 104 qubits. Conceptual picture of a 2D neutral-atom qubit array. a) High-numerical-aperture lenses project several different wavelengths of light for control and measurement of the qubits. Specific choices of optical wavelengths depend on the atomic species. Not shown are optics for initial laser cooling, transport to the array, beam scanning, and imaging for qubit measurement. b) Averaged fluorescence image of 49 atomic qubits on a 2D grid with |
3.8μm| spacing [8]. From a fundamental perspective the prospects for scaling neutral-atom systems are particularly promising due to the exceptionally large ratio between coherent and incoherent coupling rates. Neutral-atom qubits are encoded in hyperfine ground states for which coherence times of the order of 10 s have been demonstrated [10]. This implies a dephasing rate |
γ∼0.1s−1|. The coherent coupling that enables quantum logic operations is switched on by exciting atoms to high-lying Rydberg states with principal quantum number close to 100 [11,12]. Rydberg excited atoms at spacings of a few micrometers in an optical lattice interact coherently with rates |
g>109s−1|. The ratio between desired coherent coupling and residual incoherent dephasing of g/γ ∼ 1010 establishes a figure of merit that is enabling for scalability. To our knowledge only trapped ions can claim a similar g/γ ratio [13], but without a correspondingly direct path towards controlling thousands of qubits in a single processing unit. Although the g/γ ratio is exceptionally favorable for neutral-atom qubits a complete set of universal gate operations has not yet been demonstrated with high fidelity. Single-qubit gates in large 2D and 3D arrays have reached fidelity |
F∼0.999| [8,10]. However, the highest demonstrated fidelity for two-qubit entanglement mediated by Rydberg-state interactions is |
F<0.8| [6,14,15], a value that is well short of the theoretical limit of |
F>0.9999| [16,17]. There is healthy optimism within the research community working with neutral-atom qubits that combining improved laser sources with reduced noise, better cooling to reduce motional dephasing, and control of stray electric fields that perturb Rydberg atoms will lead to substantially improved gate fidelity in the near future. Recent results with better filtering of laser phase noise have already demonstrated remarkable improvement in ground–Rydberg entanglement [18]. The outlook for the next few years appears very promising. We anticipate that with advances in lasers, optical lattices for atom trapping, deterministic rearrangement and loading of atoms in multi-dimensional arrays [19,20], and optics for fast beam scanning it will be possible to increase the number of physical qubits in a single neutral-atom module to at least 104. A challenging yet plausible path to a million-qubit processor can then be contemplated by connecting 100 such modules with atom–photon entanglement channels [21]. Beyond the potential for advancing the state of the art in computation, development of techniques for single-atom control inside large multi-atom arrays will enable other applications of quantum science including metrology and time-keeping. Rydberg interactions that are at the heart of a neutral-atom quantum computer may lead to multi-atom entanglement and Heisenberg scaling of atomic-clock precision [22]. This work was supported by the NSF and ARL CDQI.
Quantum mechanics is witnessing its second revolution. It is of fundamental academic interest and of paramount benefit for new and nascent industries and technologies. The QM is the driving force behind the discovery practical applications, such as quantum camera, quantum time, quantum computing or quantum cryptography, to name a few. Consumer electronics nowadays, like mobile phones, the Internet, GPS, or QLED TV, would be impossible without the progress in QM. The field of QM was established by Max Planck in 1900. From then on, tremendous effort has been dedicated to the study of QM, which led to the ground-breaking invention of the laser, the creation of entangled quantum particles, semiconductor quantum dots (QD), the cooling of atoms, quantum manipulation of individual atoms, and quantum computing (QC). The discovery of those phenomena was awarded by several Nobel Prizes, most notably in 2022 to Aspect, Clauser & Zeilinger for the discovery of entanglement and in 2023 to Ekimov, Brus and Bawendi for the discovery of QD. With a new paradigm and extremely efficient approaches to solving problems that were, until recently, in the realm of science fiction only. Quantum computation is the most anticipated new technology on the horizon. QC aims to solve challenging computational tasks by utilising rules of quantum mechanics to manipulate the information. Here, we propose to simulate quantum systems consisting of many thousands of atoms in QD and its many body phenomena on a quantum computer based on the arrays of Rydberg atoms. The precision and robustness offered by the Ry-mediated entanglement protocols are the key factors for their penetration and wider applicability in experiments and in nascent quantum industries. However, to realise them, one needs to control a large assembly of quantum objects with exquisite precision. This is a tremendously difficult task, both from the point of intellectual comprehension and from the technological point of view. Indeed, such academic developments spur the race in quantum technology, ultimately aiming at quantum supremacy, when the quantum computers will outperform the speed and abilities of conventional supercomputers when manipulating data. Along the overview of the historical context, I will review the program of my Fulbright Scholarship which is devoted to quantum computing with Rydberg atoms. I will offer the contribution to the current understanding and challenges of many-body processes in QD and how they can be addresses by Ry-atoms quantum computers.
Quantum information processing based on Rydberg atoms emerged as a promising direction two decades ago. Recent experimental and theoretical progresses have shined exciting light on this avenue. In this concise review, we will briefly introduce the basics of Rydberg atoms and their recent applications in associated areas of neutral atom quantum computation and simulation. We shall also include related discussions on quantum optics with Rydberg atomic ensembles, which are increasingly used to explore quantum computation and quantum simulation with photons.
Platforms consisting of neutral atoms individually trapped in arrays of optical tweezers have achieved important milestones in quantum simulation and quantum computation. With access to programmable Rydberg interactions, individual qubit control, long coherence times, and naturally identical qubit transitions, neutral atoms are a promising building-block for the use in future quantum machines. However, they face the same challenge as other quantum platforms in scaling the number of qubits needed to perform algorithms with a provable advantage over classical computers. An avenue toward scaling systems of neutral atoms may be to use a quantum network that connects individual systems to construct a distributed computing architecture. Key to this approach is for the atoms to have access to an efficient optical interface, where the quantum information can be mapped to a single photon and sent across a quantum network. This thesis explores using a nanophotonic crystal cavity to act as this interface. With our device, we have demonstrated high-cooperativity coupling of two atoms to the photonic mode, generated entanglement at the device using a projective measurement, and coherently transported an entangled pair of atoms away from the device. Furthermore, we have taken the first steps toward integrating this device with Rydberg-excited atoms. We have found that the nanoscale dielectric device creates a point-charge electric field that minimally perturbs ground-Rydberg qubit coherence at distances greater than 200 microns. Using the Rydberg blockade effect, we have created an entangled pair of atoms to perform entanglement-assisted sensing of the electric field to better understand its control. Overall, these experiments show how this nanophotonic device is a promising candidate to use as an optical interface for a Rydberg atom-based quantum computing node.
In order to provide novel techniques for processing, storing, and transmitting information, the multidisciplinary field of quantum information science (QIS) integrates ideas from quantum physics [ 4 ] with information science. However, due to a number of events, including Peter Shor’s invention of quantum algorithms and the rise in interest in quantum computing, the history of QIS started to expand quickly in the early to middle 1990s. Peter Shor, a physicist and mathematician, developed the first quantum algorithm that could factor big numbers exponentially more rapidly than any classical algorithm in 1994. This finding triggered strong interest in quantum computing’s potential to tackle issues that are currently unsolvable for classical computers. Since then, QIS has advanced due to the development of novel quantum algorithms and enhancements in the hardware used for quantum computing. Understanding complex quantum phenomena like entanglement and superposition and developing novel strategies for utilizing them for information processing and communication are the core goals of QIS. Quantum bits (qubits) can exist in superpositions of 0 and 1 simultaneously, which enables far more efficient computation than classical bits, which can only be in one state or the other at a given time. Superposition is a key concept in quantum computing. In addition to superposition, entanglement, coherence, and quantum algorithms are other important QIS concepts. Entanglement is a key feature of quantum mechanics and has been observed experimentally in a wide range of physical systems, including photons, atoms, and superconducting qubits. Two particles can get entangled with one another through a phenomenon called entanglement in which their quantum states exhibit a high correlation. This indicates that even if two particles are separated by a considerable distance, modifying the state of one can change the state of the other. No matter how far away two separate particles are from one another when they are entangled, measuring the state of one particle immediately gives the state of another particle. It plays a central role in many quantum technologies, including quantum computing for solving complex problems that take classical computers a long time to solve, quantum cryptography for secure communications, quantum sensing for quantum properties of particles to enable more precise measurements, and quantum networking to improve communication and processing speed over both short and long distances. Quantum metrology methods use the principles of quantum mechanics to improve the accuracy of measurements in fields like gravity sensors, timekeeping, and frequency standards. Some of the benefits of QIS are enhanced computing power, improved communication, advanced cryptography, more precise scientific measurements, and better logistics optimization.