Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics Today

Should Quantum Physics Go Unquestioned?

Bryson Brown, Peter W. Milonni, Kalervo V. Laurikainen, Mano Singham, Elias P. Gyftopoulos, James L Park, Oreste Piccioni, Werner A. W. Mehlhop, Brian C. Wright, James I. Berg, Herman Feshbach, Victor F. Weisskopf

Published Apr 1, 1989• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1063/1.2810964

Related papers

The Theory of Bose–Einstein Condensation of Dilute Gases

Keith R. Burnett, Mark Edwards, Charles W. Clark

Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) has long been known to be a key element of macroscopic quantum phenomena such as superconductivity and superfluidity. BEC per se, however, eluded direct and unquestioned observation until 1995, when experimental groups produced condensates in dilute atomic alkali gases.

Physics Today•Dec 1, 1999•55 citations

Whither Quantum Theory?

David Finkelstein

Birkhäuser Basel eBooks•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Quantum Physics: What and Why

Dick Kovar, Sean J. O'Reilly, William V. Medlin

Science News•Feb 22, 1986•0 citations

Elastic Time and the Patent Clerk

Kit Pedler

Remote viewing experiments suggest that information can get across space in ways that Newtonian physicists would say was impossible. In 1905 an engineer in a Swiss patent office created a theory which stood science on its head. Space was the emptiness between things and time was an unvarying beat which remained exactly the same everywhere in the universe. Einstein’s theory was called the Special Theory of Relativity, and it began physics on its way towards understanding the idea that mind can influence matter. Einstein retained a very simple approach to things. He was obsessed with the nature of reality, but he also had an elegantly logical mind, and so was not prepared to accept unquestioningly his view of the world about him as being either real or the same for everyone else.

Routledge eBooks•Oct 4, 2023•0 citations

The Crisis in Quantum Physics

Benjamin Z. Gal-Or

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1987•0 citations

Is the World Objective?

Shantena Augusto Sabbadini

The assumption of an objective world underlying all our experiences is deeply embedded in our everyday thinking and in our language, and has been an unquestioned presupposition of the scientific enterprise for at least four centuries. Yet it is well known that quantum physics raises some highly problematic questions in this respect, questions that are still open, almost a century from the inception of the theory. I would like to propose that these questions stem from deep philosophical assumptions and can be answered in a much more coherent way if we understand the notion of an objective world not as a primary reality, but as an emergent aspect of a primary process that can be described as “experiencing”. A coherent description of the appearance of an objective world in the process of experiencing relies on a certain understanding of what is technically known as the “quantum measurement problem”, i.e. the description of the process of observation in quantum physics, which is the key problematic aspect of the theory. I will propose that the basic features that characterize a quantum observation have a much wider scope, and describe in fact all acquisition of information by an “embodied observer”, in short all experiencing happening in the world. By applying to this larger context work I have done in the more technical frame of the quantum measurement problem it can be shown that the nature of the process of experiencing is such as to inevitably generate the appearance of an objective world. Thus the objectivity of the world, although not primary and ultimately real, is an intrinsic consequence of our “experiential embodiment”, i.e. of the fact that we are in the world and all our experiences correspond to physical happenings in the world. When examined in this perspective, the “paradoxes” of quantum physics are an invitation to abandon the metaphysical assumption of the primacy of the objective dimension of reality. A philosophical position much more in tune with quantum physics views the process of experiencing as the primary source of both subject and object, consciousness and world.

Open Journal of Philosophy•Jan 1, 2014•1 citation
Remote viewing experiments suggest that information can get across space in ways that Newtonian physicists would say was impossible. In 1905 an engineer in a Swiss patent office created a theory which stood science on its head. Space was the emptiness between things and time was an unvarying beat which remained exactly the same everywhere in the universe. Einstein’s theory was called the Special Theory of Relativity, and it began physics on its way towards understanding the idea that mind can influence matter. Einstein retained a very simple approach to things. He was obsessed with the nature of reality, but he also had an elegantly logical mind, and so was not prepared to accept unquestioningly his view of the world about him as being either real or the same for everyone else.
The assumption of an objective world underlying all our experiences is deeply embedded in our everyday thinking and in our language, and has been an unquestioned presupposition of the scientific enterprise for at least four centuries. Yet it is well known that quantum physics raises some highly problematic questions in this respect, questions that are still open, almost a century from the inception of the theory. I would like to propose that these questions stem from deep philosophical assumptions and can be answered in a much more coherent way if we understand the notion of an objective world not as a primary reality, but as an emergent aspect of a primary process that can be described as “experiencing”. A coherent description of the appearance of an objective world in the process of experiencing relies on a certain understanding of what is technically known as the “quantum measurement problem”, i.e. the description of the process of observation in quantum physics, which is the key problematic aspect of the theory. I will propose that the basic features that characterize a quantum observation have a much wider scope, and describe in fact all acquisition of information by an “embodied observer”, in short all experiencing happening in the world. By applying to this larger context work I have done in the more technical frame of the quantum measurement problem it can be shown that the nature of the process of experiencing is such as to inevitably generate the appearance of an objective world. Thus the objectivity of the world, although not primary and ultimately real, is an intrinsic consequence of our “experiential embodiment”, i.e. of the fact that we are in the world and all our experiences correspond to physical happenings in the world. When examined in this perspective, the “paradoxes” of quantum physics are an invitation to abandon the metaphysical assumption of the primacy of the objective dimension of reality. A philosophical position much more in tune with quantum physics views the process of experiencing as the primary source of both subject and object, consciousness and world.