Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Average dwell time and tunneling

H. M. Nussenzveig

Published Sep 15, 2000• 30 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The average dwell time of an arbitrary wave packet within the interaction region, in nonrelativistic one-dimensional quantum scattering, is obtained. The results are applied to tunneling, yielding a new derivation and reinterpretation of the B\"uttiker-Landauer barrier interaction times (for a rectangular barrier, of the Larmor times), entirely within the framework of standard quantum measurement theory.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.62.042107

Related papers

Barrier interaction time and the Salecker-Wigner quantum clock: Wave-packet approach

Chang-Soo Park

The time-of-flight measurement approach of Peres based on the Salecker-Wigner quantum clock is applied to the one-dimensional scattering of a wave packet from a rectangular barrier. By directly evaluating the expectation value of the clock-time operator in the asymptotic states of wave packet long after the scattering process, we derive an average wave-packet clock time for the barrier interaction, which is expressed as an average of the stationary-state clock time over all possible initial scattering states of the wave packet. We show that the average wave-packet clock time is identical to the average dwell time of a wave packet.

Physical Review A•Jul 23, 2009•10 citations

Transmission, Reflection, and Interference Contributions to the Tunnelling Dwell Time

S. Brouard, R. Sala Mayato, Juan Gonzalo Muga

Expressions for the transmission, reflection, and interference contributions to the dwell time for wave packet scattering are obtained by means of scattering theory projector operators that provide a unifying framework for various dwell time decompositions. These different dwell time resolutions are illustrated with the aid of a formal analogy between the two-level system and one-dimensional scattering. The complex "times" and Larmor times proposed by other authors are found as particular cases of the theory. Numerical calculations for a rectangular barrier are provided.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Apr 20, 1993•21 citations

Quantum tunneling times: A new solution compared to 12 other methods

Mark J. Hagmann

A variety of different theoretical procedures have been used to determine tunneling times. These include (1) phase time; (2) the Stevens procedure; (3) Larmor times; (4) a complex “time”; (5) dwell time; (6) the Büttikker-Landauer time; (7) Feynman path-integrals; (8) scattering theory; (9) a stochastic formulation; (10) oscillatory perturbation of the barrier; (11) kinetic time; and (12) the semiclassical solution. Interest in tunneling times is not purely pedagogical, since correction for changes in image potential during transit is required in determining the conductance of several new high-speed semiconductor devices. A new procedure to evaluate transit time is presented, which assumes that energy fluctuations keep a tunneling particle above the barrier while transiting the classically forbidden region. For large rectangular barriers, the most probable fluctuations minimize the product of their magnitude and the transit time. This results in the semiclassical solution. For the case of very small barriers, there is a separate solution in which the transit time is indeterminate but bounded. The new solution is compared with 12 different results by others. Numerical values, limiting forms, and interpretations are presented for these various tunneling times. Difficulties in using time domain numerical solutions to determine the transit time for a wave packet will also be described. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Mar 14, 1992•9 citations

Dwell times for transmission and reflection

Nikolay Leonidovich Chuprikov

As was shown in quant-ph/0405028, the state of a tunneling particle can be uniquely presented as a coherent superposition of two states to describe alternative sub-processes, transmission and reflection. In this paper, on the basis of the stationary wave functions for these sub-processes, we give new definitions of the dwell times for transmission and reflection. In the case of rectangular potential barriers the dwell times are obtained explicitly. In contrast with the well-known Büttiker's dwell-time, our dwell time for transmission increases exponentially, for the under-barrier tunneling, with increasing the barrier's width. By our approach the well-known Hartman effect is rather an artifact resulted from an improper interpretation of the wave-packet tunneling and experimental data, but not a real physical effect accompanying the tunneling phenomenon.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502073•Feb 14, 2005•2 citations

Tunneling times: a critical review

E. H. Hauge, Jon Andreas Støvneng

The old question of "How long does it take to tunnel through a barrier?" has acquired new urgency with the advent of techniques for the fabrication of semiconductor structures in the nanometer range. For the restricted problem of tunneling in a scattering configuration, a coherent picture is now emerging. The dwell time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$ has the status of an exact statement of the time spent in a region of space, averaged over all incoming particles. The phase times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ are defined separately for transmitted and reflected particles. They are asymptotic statements on completed scattering events and include self-interference delays as well as the time spent in the barrier. Consequently, neither the dwell time nor the phase times can answer the question of how much time a transmitted (alternatively, reflected) particle spent in the barrier region. Our discussion of this question relies on a few simple criteria: (1) The average duration of a physical process must be real. (2) Since transmission and reflection are mutually exclusive events, the times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ spent in the barrier region are, if they exist, conditional averages. Consequently, they must obey the identity ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}=T{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}+R{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$, where $T$ and $R$ are the transmission and reflection probabilities, respectively. The existence of this identity distinguishes tunneling in a scattering configuration from tunneling out of a metastable state. (3) Any proposed ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ must meet every requirement that can be constructed from ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$. On the basis of (2), the naively extrapolated phase times, as well as the B\"uttiker-Landauer time, must be rejected. The local Larmor times, as introduced by Baz', satisfy (2), but not every criterion of type (3). The local Larmor clock is therefore unreliable. The asymptotic Larmor clock shows the phase times, as it should. Finally, the inverse characteristic frequency of an oscillating barrier cannot always be defined. It is shown not to represent the duration of the tunneling process. This leaves the dwell time and the phase times as the only well-established times in this context. It also leaves open the question of the length of time a transmitted particle spends in the barrier region. It is not clear that a generally valid answer to this question exists.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Oct 1, 1989•1,074 citations

Temporal aspects of one-dimensional completed scattering: An alternative view

Nikolay Leonidovich Chuprikov

A {\it completed} scattering of a particle on a static one-dimensional (1D) potential barrier is a combined quantum process to consist from two elementary sub-processes (transmission and reflection) evolved coherently at all stages of scattering and macroscopically distinct at the final stage. The existing model of the process is clearly inadequate to its nature: all one-particle "observables" and "tunneling times", introduced as quantities to be common for the sub-processes, cannot be experimentally measured and, consequently, have no physical meaning; on the contrary, quantities introduced for either sub-process have no basis, for the time evolution of either sub-process is unknown in this model. We show that the wave function to describe a completed scattering can be uniquely presented as the sum of two solutions to the Schrödinger equation, which describe separately the sub-processes at all stages of scattering. For symmetric potential barriers such solutions are found explicitly. For either sub-process we define the time spent, on the average, by a particle in the barrier region. We define it as the Larmor time. As it turned out, this time is just Buttiker's dwell time averaged over the corresponding localized state. Thus, firstly, we justify the known definition of the local dwell time introduced by Hauge and co-workers as well by Leavens and Aers, for now this time can be measured; secondly, we confirm that namely Buttiker's dwell time gives the energy-distribution for the tunneling time; thirdly, we state that all the definitions are valid only if they are based on the wave functions for transmission and reflection found in our paper. Besides, we define the exact and asymptotic group times to be auxiliary in timing the scattering process.

arXiv:quant-ph/0511024•Nov 3, 2005•1 citation
The average dwell time of an arbitrary wave packet within the interaction region, in nonrelativistic one-dimensional quantum scattering, is obtained. The results are applied to tunneling, yielding a new derivation and reinterpretation of the B"uttiker-Landauer barrier interaction times (for a rectangular barrier, of the Larmor times), entirely within the framework of standard quantum measurement theory.
The time-of-flight measurement approach of Peres based on the Salecker-Wigner quantum clock is applied to the one-dimensional scattering of a wave packet from a rectangular barrier. By directly evaluating the expectation value of the clock-time operator in the asymptotic states of wave packet long after the scattering process, we derive an average wave-packet clock time for the barrier interaction, which is expressed as an average of the stationary-state clock time over all possible initial scattering states of the wave packet. We show that the average wave-packet clock time is identical to the average dwell time of a wave packet.
Expressions for the transmission, reflection, and interference contributions to the dwell time for wave packet scattering are obtained by means of scattering theory projector operators that provide a unifying framework for various dwell time decompositions. These different dwell time resolutions are illustrated with the aid of a formal analogy between the two-level system and one-dimensional scattering. The complex "times" and Larmor times proposed by other authors are found as particular cases of the theory. Numerical calculations for a rectangular barrier are provided.
A variety of different theoretical procedures have been used to determine tunneling times. These include (1) phase time; (2) the Stevens procedure; (3) Larmor times; (4) a complex “time”; (5) dwell time; (6) the Büttikker-Landauer time; (7) Feynman path-integrals; (8) scattering theory; (9) a stochastic formulation; (10) oscillatory perturbation of the barrier; (11) kinetic time; and (12) the semiclassical solution. Interest in tunneling times is not purely pedagogical, since correction for changes in image potential during transit is required in determining the conductance of several new high-speed semiconductor devices. A new procedure to evaluate transit time is presented, which assumes that energy fluctuations keep a tunneling particle above the barrier while transiting the classically forbidden region. For large rectangular barriers, the most probable fluctuations minimize the product of their magnitude and the transit time. This results in the semiclassical solution. For the case of very small barriers, there is a separate solution in which the transit time is indeterminate but bounded. The new solution is compared with 12 different results by others. Numerical values, limiting forms, and interpretations are presented for these various tunneling times. Difficulties in using time domain numerical solutions to determine the transit time for a wave packet will also be described. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
As was shown in quant-ph/0405028, the state of a tunneling particle can be uniquely presented as a coherent superposition of two states to describe alternative sub-processes, transmission and reflection. In this paper, on the basis of the stationary wave functions for these sub-processes, we give new definitions of the dwell times for transmission and reflection. In the case of rectangular potential barriers the dwell times are obtained explicitly. In contrast with the well-known Büttiker's dwell-time, our dwell time for transmission increases exponentially, for the under-barrier tunneling, with increasing the barrier's width. By our approach the well-known Hartman effect is rather an artifact resulted from an improper interpretation of the wave-packet tunneling and experimental data, but not a real physical effect accompanying the tunneling phenomenon.
The old question of "How long does it take to tunnel through a barrier?" has acquired new urgency with the advent of techniques for the fabrication of semiconductor structures in the nanometer range. For the restricted problem of tunneling in a scattering configuration, a coherent picture is now emerging. The dwell time ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$ has the status of an exact statement of the time spent in a region of space, averaged over all incoming particles. The phase times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}^{\ensuremath{\phi}}$ are defined separately for transmitted and reflected particles. They are asymptotic statements on completed scattering events and include self-interference delays as well as the time spent in the barrier. Consequently, neither the dwell time nor the phase times can answer the question of how much time a transmitted (alternatively, reflected) particle spent in the barrier region. Our discussion of this question relies on a few simple criteria: (1) The average duration of a physical process must be real. (2) Since transmission and reflection are mutually exclusive events, the times ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ spent in the barrier region are, if they exist, conditional averages. Consequently, they must obey the identity ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}=T{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}+R{\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$, where TTT and RRR are the transmission and reflection probabilities, respectively. The existence of this identity distinguishes tunneling in a scattering configuration from tunneling out of a metastable state. (3) Any proposed ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{T}$ and ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{R}$ must meet every requirement that can be constructed from ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{D}$. On the basis of (2), the naively extrapolated phase times, as well as the B\"uttiker-Landauer time, must be rejected. The local Larmor times, as introduced by Baz', satisfy (2), but not every criterion of type (3). The local Larmor clock is therefore unreliable. The asymptotic Larmor clock shows the phase times, as it should. Finally, the inverse characteristic frequency of an oscillating barrier cannot always be defined. It is shown not to represent the duration of the tunneling process. This leaves the dwell time and the phase times as the only well-established times in this context. It also leaves open the question of the length of time a transmitted particle spends in the barrier region. It is not clear that a generally valid answer to this question exists.
A {\it completed} scattering of a particle on a static one-dimensional (1D) potential barrier is a combined quantum process to consist from two elementary sub-processes (transmission and reflection) evolved coherently at all stages of scattering and macroscopically distinct at the final stage. The existing model of the process is clearly inadequate to its nature: all one-particle "observables" and "tunneling times", introduced as quantities to be common for the sub-processes, cannot be experimentally measured and, consequently, have no physical meaning; on the contrary, quantities introduced for either sub-process have no basis, for the time evolution of either sub-process is unknown in this model. We show that the wave function to describe a completed scattering can be uniquely presented as the sum of two solutions to the Schrödinger equation, which describe separately the sub-processes at all stages of scattering. For symmetric potential barriers such solutions are found explicitly. For either sub-process we define the time spent, on the average, by a particle in the barrier region. We define it as the Larmor time. As it turned out, this time is just Buttiker's dwell time averaged over the corresponding localized state. Thus, firstly, we justify the known definition of the local dwell time introduced by Hauge and co-workers as well by Leavens and Aers, for now this time can be measured; secondly, we confirm that namely Buttiker's dwell time gives the energy-distribution for the tunneling time; thirdly, we state that all the definitions are valid only if they are based on the wave functions for transmission and reflection found in our paper. Besides, we define the exact and asymptotic group times to be auxiliary in timing the scattering process.