Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Feynman-Graph Expansion for the Equation of State near the Critical Point (Ising-like Case)

E. Brézin, D. J. Wallace, Kenneth Geddes Wilson

Published Aug 28, 1972• 158 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The scaling equation of state of an Ising-like ferromagnet is derived by an expansion in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$, where $d$ is the dimension of space. The result is compared with numerical calculations on the three-dimensional Ising model. It is also established that the "linear model" is exact up to order ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{2}$.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.29.591

Related papers

Feynman-Graph Expansion for the Equation of State near the Critical Point

E. Brézin, D. J. Wallace, Kenneth Geddes Wilson

The scaling equation of state for a generalized classical Heisenberg ferromagnet near the critical point is derived by an expansion in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$, where $d$ is the dimension of space. It is shown that, though infrared divergences are induced by the Goldstone modes, the equation of state is divergence free. The results are compared with previous numerical calculations. It is also shown that, for non-Ising-like systems the "linear model" cannot be exact, even at first order in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ (although the numerical deviations from linearity are small).

Physical review. B, Solid state•Jan 1, 1973•274 citations

Feynman-Graph Expansion for Critical Exponents

Kenneth Geddes Wilson

The critical exponents $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, $\ensuremath{\eta}$ and the "crossover index" $\ensuremath{\phi}$ are computed for generalized classical Heisenberg models with $n$ internal degrees of freedom as an exact expansion in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$ ($d$ is the number of space dimensions). Results are obtained to order ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{2}$ for $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and to order ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{3}$ for $\ensuremath{\eta}$. The results to this order for the three-dimensional Ising case ($n=\ensuremath{\epsilon}=1$) are $\ensuremath{\gamma}=1.244$ and $\ensuremath{\eta}=0.037$.

Physical Review Letters•Feb 28, 1972•654 citations

Nonperturbative renormalization group approach to the Ising model: A derivative expansion at order ∂4

Léonie Canet, Bertrand Delamotte, D. Mouhanna +1 more

On the example of the three-dimensional Ising model, we show that nonperturbative renormalization group equations allow one to obtain very accurate critical exponents. Implementing the order ${\ensuremath{\partial}}^{4}$ of the derivative expansion leads to $\ensuremath{\nu}=0.632$ and to an anomalous dimension $\ensuremath{\eta}=0.033$ which is significantly improved compared with lower orders calculations.

arXiv:hep-th/0302227•Physical review. B, Condensed matter•Aug 22, 2003•195 citations

Equation of State near the Critical Point. I. Calculation of the Scaling Function for S=12 and S=∞ Heisenberg Models Using High-Temperature Series Expansions

S. Milošević, Eugene Stanley

In recent years there have been many measurements of the scaling-law equation of state for different materials, and the "scaling function" so obtained has generally been fit by an empirical equation involving the selection of several adjustable parameters. We propose a method for calculating, directly from high-temperature series expansions, the function $h(x)$ that determines the scaling-law equation of state $H={M}^{\ensuremath{\delta}}h(x)$. Previously, $h(x)$ has been calculated only for the $S=\frac{1}{2}$ Ising model, but the method is not generalizable to the case of the Heisenberg model because it relies upon the use of low-temperature expansions as well, and these are not known for the Heisenberg model. First we calculate $h(x)$ for the Ising model (bcc, fcc, and simple cubic lattices) in order to assess the utility and credibility of our method. Our Ising model $h(x)$ agrees well with the previous calculation that used both high-and low-temperature expansions. Next we calculate $h(x)$ in its entire region of definition for the $S=\frac{1}{2}$ Heisenberg model (fcc and bcc lattices) and the $S=\ensuremath{\infty}$ Heisenberg models (fcc lattice), where $S$ denotes the spin quantum number. The accuracy of our resulting expressions is limited by the finite number of known terms in the corresponding high-temperature series expansions, but it is generally of the order of a few percent. In Paper II the scaling functions calculated here are compared with experiment and with the predictions of the universality hypothesis.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Aug 1, 1972•51 citations

Equation of state and scaling relations for isotropic ferromagnets with dipolar interactions

Amnon Aharony A, Alastair D. Bruce

The scaling equation of state for ferromagnets with both isotropic exchange and dipolar interactions near the critical point is derived to first order in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$, where $d$ is the dimensionality of space and is also equal to the number of spin components. The resulting scaling function is found to be rather close numerically to its pure short-range counterpart at $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=1$, although the functional forms are quite different. Several universal quantities are derived; in particular, the ratio of the amplitudes of the zero-field specific heats above and below ${T}_{c}$ is found to be $\frac{{A}^{+}}{{A}^{\ensuremath{-}}}=\frac{6}{5}+O(\ensuremath{\epsilon})$, compared with $\frac{{A}^{+}}{{A}^{\ensuremath{-}}}=1+O(\ensuremath{\epsilon})$ for pure short-range interactions.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Oct 1, 1974•34 citations

Renormalization-group calculation for the equation of state of an Ising ferromagnet

Bernard Nienhuis, Michael Nauenberg

The renormalization-group series expansion for the free energy of the Ising model is applied to obtain the equation of state in an external magnetic field. Numerical calculations for a square lattice in a four-cell-cluster approximation are compared in the scaling limit with results of high- and low-temperature series expansions.

Physical review. B, Solid state•Jun 1, 1975•53 citations
The scaling equation of state of an Ising-like ferromagnet is derived by an expansion in \ensuremathϵ=4\ensuremath−d\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d\ensuremathϵ=4\ensuremath−d, where ddd is the dimension of space. The result is compared with numerical calculations on the three-dimensional Ising model. It is also established that the "linear model" is exact up to order \ensuremathϵ2{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{2}\ensuremathϵ2.
The scaling equation of state for a generalized classical Heisenberg ferromagnet near the critical point is derived by an expansion in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$, where ddd is the dimension of space. It is shown that, though infrared divergences are induced by the Goldstone modes, the equation of state is divergence free. The results are compared with previous numerical calculations. It is also shown that, for non-Ising-like systems the "linear model" cannot be exact, even at first order in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ (although the numerical deviations from linearity are small).
The critical exponents $\ensuremath{\gamma}$, $\ensuremath{\eta}$ and the "crossover index" $\ensuremath{\phi}$ are computed for generalized classical Heisenberg models with nnn internal degrees of freedom as an exact expansion in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$ (ddd is the number of space dimensions). Results are obtained to order ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{2}$ for $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ and to order ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}^{3}$ for $\ensuremath{\eta}$. The results to this order for the three-dimensional Ising case ($n=\ensuremath{\epsilon}=1$) are $\ensuremath{\gamma}=1.244$ and $\ensuremath{\eta}=0.037$.
In recent years there have been many measurements of the scaling-law equation of state for different materials, and the "scaling function" so obtained has generally been fit by an empirical equation involving the selection of several adjustable parameters. We propose a method for calculating, directly from high-temperature series expansions, the function h(x)h(x)h(x) that determines the scaling-law equation of state $H={M}^{\ensuremath{\delta}}h(x)$. Previously, h(x)h(x)h(x) has been calculated only for the S=12S=\frac{1}{2}S=21​ Ising model, but the method is not generalizable to the case of the Heisenberg model because it relies upon the use of low-temperature expansions as well, and these are not known for the Heisenberg model. First we calculate h(x)h(x)h(x) for the Ising model (bcc, fcc, and simple cubic lattices) in order to assess the utility and credibility of our method. Our Ising model h(x)h(x)h(x) agrees well with the previous calculation that used both high-and low-temperature expansions. Next we calculate h(x)h(x)h(x) in its entire region of definition for the S=12S=\frac{1}{2}S=21​ Heisenberg model (fcc and bcc lattices) and the $S=\ensuremath{\infty}$ Heisenberg models (fcc lattice), where SSS denotes the spin quantum number. The accuracy of our resulting expressions is limited by the finite number of known terms in the corresponding high-temperature series expansions, but it is generally of the order of a few percent. In Paper II the scaling functions calculated here are compared with experiment and with the predictions of the universality hypothesis.
The scaling equation of state for ferromagnets with both isotropic exchange and dipolar interactions near the critical point is derived to first order in $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=4\ensuremath{-}d$, where ddd is the dimensionality of space and is also equal to the number of spin components. The resulting scaling function is found to be rather close numerically to its pure short-range counterpart at $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=1$, although the functional forms are quite different. Several universal quantities are derived; in particular, the ratio of the amplitudes of the zero-field specific heats above and below Tc{T}_{c}Tc​ is found to be $\frac{{A}^{+}}{{A}^{\ensuremath{-}}}=\frac{6}{5}+O(\ensuremath{\epsilon})$, compared with $\frac{{A}^{+}}{{A}^{\ensuremath{-}}}=1+O(\ensuremath{\epsilon})$ for pure short-range interactions.