Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Compton effect as a double Doppler shift

Richard B. Kidd, James Ardini, Anatole Anton

Published Jul 1, 1985• 20 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The Compton equation is normally developed using the photon model, but it is also capable of derivation based on a classical wave model of light, and there is a considerable history of such derivations, including one by Compton himself. A simple derivation in the laboratory frame based on waves scattered by a statistical aggregate of recoil electrons is developed in this paper, providing a bridge between microscopic events and macroscopic observation, and implications of coexisting wave and particle model derivations of the Compton effect are discussed. The parallel derivations based on contrasting models can also furnish an instructive exercise for students.

DOI
10.1119/1.14274

Related papers

The Compton effect-Schrodinger's treatment

Janez Strnad

The Compton formula is obtained in a semiclassical approximation due to Schrodinger. X-rays are treated within classical electrodynamics and electrons within quantum mechanics. The superposition of the wavefunctions of the incident and recoiling electron sets up a moving periodic probability density. Incident X-rays are specularly reflected from this pattern. The results are transformed back into the original rest frame of the electron by the Doppler shift equation. Finally, some remarks pertaining to the philosophy of physics are added.

European Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1986•6 citations

Five problems for classical physics

J Manners

Chapter I The origins of quantum physics I The Compton effect — a strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation In a series of experiments conducted between 1919 and 1923, Arthur Holly Compton (Figure 1.1) investigated the scattering of monochromatic (single-wavelength) X-rays from graphite targets. He found that the radiation scattered at an angle 0 to the incident beam contained, in addition to radiation of the same wavelength as the incident radiation, a second component with a considerably longer wavelength. The existence of this second component in the scattered radiation could not be explained by the well-established theory of the scattering of electromagnetic waves by electrons. Compton considered instead the process illustrated in Figure 1.2, in which a particle of electromagnetic radiation, collides with a slow moving electron, which then recoils absorbing some of the X-ray particle’s energy. Treating the process as a collision between particles, and using only the (relativistic) conservation laws of energy and momentum, Compton was able to account for the effect completely. However, at the same time, in the same experiment, Compton was using interference effects, depending wholly on the wave model, in order to determine the wavelength of the scattered radiation. So here was an experiment which apparently required the simultaneous use of both the wave and particle models of electromagnetic radiation for the interpretation of the results! The existence of this strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation was just one indication of the need for a radical revision of views regarding the physical world.

CRC Press eBooks•Oct 8, 2018•0 citations

Matter Waves Proposed by de Broglie (1923)

S. Brandt

Abstract We have seen that it took about two decades to fully realize that light or, generally, electromagnetic radiation has both wave and particle properties. The final proof came with the discovery of the Compton effect (Episode 31). Even Compton himself needed years before he saw that the particle picture of radiation was unavoidable in view of the experimental evidence. Still in the year of Compton’s publications, Louis de Broglie [1] on purely theoretical grounds proposed that the particle–wave duality not only holds for radiation but also for material particles, i.e., for particles with a rest mass such as the electron.

•Apr 22, 1992•0 citations

The Compton effect: Transition to quantum mechanics

Roger H. Stuewer

The discovery of the Compton effect at the end of 1922 was a decisive event in the transition to the new quantum mechanics of 1925-1926 because it stimulated physicists to examine anew the fundamental problem of the interaction between radiation and matter. I first discuss Albert Einstein's light-quantum hypothesis of 1905 and why physicists greeted it with extreme skepticism, despite Robert A. Millikan's confirmation of Einstein's equation of the photoelectric effect in 1915. I then follow in some detail the experimental and theoretical research program that Arthur Holly Compton pursued between 1916 and 1922 at the University of Minnesota, the Westinghouse Lamp Company, the Cavendish Laboratory, and Washington University that culminated in his discovery of the Compton effect. Surprisingly, Compton was not influenced directly by Einstein's light-quantum hypothesis, in contrast to Peter Debye and H.A. Kramers, who discovered the quantum theory of scattering independently. I close by discussing the most significant response to that discovery, the Bohr-Kramers-Slater theory of 1924, its experimental refutation, and its influence on the emerging new quantum mechanics.

Annalen der Physik•Nov 1, 2000•41 citations

Compton effect: interacting particles or interacting waves

Oscar F. Hernández

Traditional textbook explanations of the Compton effect treat the photon electron interaction as a particle collision. This explanation is a pedagogical disaster, implying that sometimes interactions are particle-like whereas quantum mechanics always demands that they be wave-like; a photon wavefunction evolves according to a wave equation until its collapse at measurement. If this is so why then does the classical radiation wave equation fail to predict the Compton effect? We address these issues and propose a clearer explanation.

arXiv:physics/0508101•Aug 16, 2005•0 citations

Reinterpreting the Compton Effect: A Geometric Explanation Without Particles

Daniel Avilés Hurtado

The Compton effect is conventionally represented as a collision between a photon and an electron, with the observed wavelength shift determined by energy--momentum conservation and scattering geometry. This article revisits the event from a complementary perspective. Beginning from the experimental relation itself and from the wave side of wave--particle duality, we explore the Compton encounter as a finite dynamical process involving geometry, response, coupling, reorganization, and characteristic times. Two heuristic encounters guide the analysis. A stone striking a responsive surface foregrounds deformation, resistance, and relaxation, while a gravitational assist foregrounds trajectory and path-dependent exchange. These perspectives are then returned to a vortical reading of the electron and electromagnetic radiation. We distinguish an interaction time \(\tau_{\rm int}\) from a relaxation time \(\tau_{\rm relax}\), introduce the provisional ratio \(\mathcal R_{\tau}=\tau_{\rm int}/\tau_{\rm relax}\), and organize geometry, energetic cost, and coupling into a dynamical grammar of the encounter. The comparison is then extended to the photoelectric effect. Placing the naked experimental features of both phenomena side by side reveals a common radiation--matter interaction structure together with different accessible outcomes. This motivates the speculative possibility that Compton scattering and photoelectric emission occupy neighbouring regimes within a broader landscape of radiation--matter encounters. A provisional quantity, \(R_{\rm avail}\), is introduced as a possible measure of the capacity of an electronic structure and its local environment to accommodate and redistribute an incoming perturbation within a given regime. The article therefore proposes an enlargement of the Compton problem: from reproducing the observed scattering relation to investigating the physical dynamics that may connect distinct radiation--matter outcomes.

•Jan 9, 2026•0 citations
The Compton equation is normally developed using the photon model, but it is also capable of derivation based on a classical wave model of light, and there is a considerable history of such derivations, including one by Compton himself. A simple derivation in the laboratory frame based on waves scattered by a statistical aggregate of recoil electrons is developed in this paper, providing a bridge between microscopic events and macroscopic observation, and implications of coexisting wave and particle model derivations of the Compton effect are discussed. The parallel derivations based on contrasting models can also furnish an instructive exercise for students.
The Compton formula is obtained in a semiclassical approximation due to Schrodinger. X-rays are treated within classical electrodynamics and electrons within quantum mechanics. The superposition of the wavefunctions of the incident and recoiling electron sets up a moving periodic probability density. Incident X-rays are specularly reflected from this pattern. The results are transformed back into the original rest frame of the electron by the Doppler shift equation. Finally, some remarks pertaining to the philosophy of physics are added.
Chapter I The origins of quantum physics I The Compton effect — a strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation In a series of experiments conducted between 1919 and 1923, Arthur Holly Compton (Figure 1.1) investigated the scattering of monochromatic (single-wavelength) X-rays from graphite targets. He found that the radiation scattered at an angle 0 to the incident beam contained, in addition to radiation of the same wavelength as the incident radiation, a second component with a considerably longer wavelength. The existence of this second component in the scattered radiation could not be explained by the well-established theory of the scattering of electromagnetic waves by electrons. Compton considered instead the process illustrated in Figure 1.2, in which a particle of electromagnetic radiation, collides with a slow moving electron, which then recoils absorbing some of the X-ray particle’s energy. Treating the process as a collision between particles, and using only the (relativistic) conservation laws of energy and momentum, Compton was able to account for the effect completely. However, at the same time, in the same experiment, Compton was using interference effects, depending wholly on the wave model, in order to determine the wavelength of the scattered radiation. So here was an experiment which apparently required the simultaneous use of both the wave and particle models of electromagnetic radiation for the interpretation of the results! The existence of this strange dichotomy in the nature of electromagnetic radiation was just one indication of the need for a radical revision of views regarding the physical world.
Abstract We have seen that it took about two decades to fully realize that light or, generally, electromagnetic radiation has both wave and particle properties. The final proof came with the discovery of the Compton effect (Episode 31). Even Compton himself needed years before he saw that the particle picture of radiation was unavoidable in view of the experimental evidence. Still in the year of Compton’s publications, Louis de Broglie [1] on purely theoretical grounds proposed that the particle–wave duality not only holds for radiation but also for material particles, i.e., for particles with a rest mass such as the electron.
The discovery of the Compton effect at the end of 1922 was a decisive event in the transition to the new quantum mechanics of 1925-1926 because it stimulated physicists to examine anew the fundamental problem of the interaction between radiation and matter. I first discuss Albert Einstein's light-quantum hypothesis of 1905 and why physicists greeted it with extreme skepticism, despite Robert A. Millikan's confirmation of Einstein's equation of the photoelectric effect in 1915. I then follow in some detail the experimental and theoretical research program that Arthur Holly Compton pursued between 1916 and 1922 at the University of Minnesota, the Westinghouse Lamp Company, the Cavendish Laboratory, and Washington University that culminated in his discovery of the Compton effect. Surprisingly, Compton was not influenced directly by Einstein's light-quantum hypothesis, in contrast to Peter Debye and H.A. Kramers, who discovered the quantum theory of scattering independently. I close by discussing the most significant response to that discovery, the Bohr-Kramers-Slater theory of 1924, its experimental refutation, and its influence on the emerging new quantum mechanics.
Traditional textbook explanations of the Compton effect treat the photon electron interaction as a particle collision. This explanation is a pedagogical disaster, implying that sometimes interactions are particle-like whereas quantum mechanics always demands that they be wave-like; a photon wavefunction evolves according to a wave equation until its collapse at measurement. If this is so why then does the classical radiation wave equation fail to predict the Compton effect? We address these issues and propose a clearer explanation.
The Compton effect is conventionally represented as a collision between a photon and an electron, with the observed wavelength shift determined by energy--momentum conservation and scattering geometry. This article revisits the event from a complementary perspective. Beginning from the experimental relation itself and from the wave side of wave--particle duality, we explore the Compton encounter as a finite dynamical process involving geometry, response, coupling, reorganization, and characteristic times. Two heuristic encounters guide the analysis. A stone striking a responsive surface foregrounds deformation, resistance, and relaxation, while a gravitational assist foregrounds trajectory and path-dependent exchange. These perspectives are then returned to a vortical reading of the electron and electromagnetic radiation. We distinguish an interaction time τint\tau_{\rm int}τint​ from a relaxation time τrelax\tau_{\rm relax}τrelax​, introduce the provisional ratio Rτ=τint/τrelax\mathcal R_{\tau}=\tau_{\rm int}/\tau_{\rm relax}Rτ​=τint​/τrelax​, and organize geometry, energetic cost, and coupling into a dynamical grammar of the encounter. The comparison is then extended to the photoelectric effect. Placing the naked experimental features of both phenomena side by side reveals a common radiation--matter interaction structure together with different accessible outcomes. This motivates the speculative possibility that Compton scattering and photoelectric emission occupy neighbouring regimes within a broader landscape of radiation--matter encounters. A provisional quantity, RavailR_{\rm avail}Ravail​, is introduced as a possible measure of the capacity of an electronic structure and its local environment to accommodate and redistribute an incoming perturbation within a given regime. The article therefore proposes an enlargement of the Compton problem: from reproducing the observed scattering relation to investigating the physical dynamics that may connect distinct radiation--matter outcomes.