Hidden variables and locality

Sofia Wechsler

A recent article of Colbeck and Renner tackled the problem whether entanglements may be explained by combined models of local and non-local hidden variables. To the difference from previous works they considered models in which each pair of entangled particles behaves in the same way, and the particles in the pair are equivalent, i.e. each of them produces its response to a measurement according to both local and non-local hidden variables. Their article aimed at proving that the local hidden variable component in such models has no effect on the measurement results, i.e. only the non-local variables are relevant. However, their proof deals with a very restrictive case and assumes questionable constraints on the hidden variables. The present text studies the Colbeck and Renner class of models on a less restrictive case and under no constraints on the hidden variables. It is shown again that the local component cannot have any influence on the results. However, the Colbeck and Renner class of models is not the only one possible. A different class is described, and it admits local hidden variables by the side of the non-local influence. This class presents a couple of advantages.

R. N. Nijhoff

Recently, Matzkin claimed the construction of a hidden variable (HV) model which is both local and equivalent with the quantum-mechanical predictions. In this paper we will briefly present this HV model and argue, by identifying an extra non-local "hidden" HV, why this model is not local

Jan-Åke Larsson, Adán Cabello

We criticize Colbeck and Renner's (CR's) statement that "any hidden variable model can only be compatible with quantum mechanics if its local part is trivial" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 050403 (2008)]. We note that CR's attempt to divide a nonlocal hidden variable model into a "local part" and a "nonlocal part" contains a restriction on the latter. This restriction implies that the division is really into a "local part" and a "nonsignaling nonlocal part." CR's nonsignaling requirement on the "nonlocal part" cannot be physically motivated, since the hidden variables cannot be accessed by experimenters. Nor is it a natural mathematical generalization from the local hidden variable case, since it is simple to make a generalization without CR's requirement. We give an explicit nonlocal hidden variable model that, in the case the restriction is not enforced, contains nontrivial local hidden variables.

Miklós Rédei