Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Semiclassical energy quantization of anharmonic potential motion-complex trajectory contributions versus higher-order corrections

Karl-Erik Thylwe, Örjan Dammert

Published Jun 7, 1994• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In the present investigation we assess the relevance of both classically forbidden phenomena and higher-order asymptotic contributions for the semiclassical energy quantization of a particle in the anharmonic oscillator potential V(x)=x 2 /2+ lambda x 4 . We propose an iterative method (Iq) for obtaining higher-order semiclassical corrections, which is similar to the WKB and phase-integral methods in the lowest order, but in higher orders the approximation differs significantly. A 'primitive' Bohr-Sommerfeld energy quantization is compared with a more complete semiclassical quantization, taking into account both complex trajectory contributions and higher-order (quantal) corrections.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/27/11/046

Related papers

The Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule and the Weyl correspondence

Petros N. Argyres

With the use of the Weyl correspondence between quantum mechanical operators and classical dynamical functions, an exact quantization rule is derived for a system with one degree of freedom and arbitrary Hamiltonian. In the semiclassical limit of small Planck's constant, this reduces to the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule as derived by the WKB approximation. Higher order terms are also derived. It is further proven that for a simple harmonic oscillator the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule must give the exact energy eigenvalues for all states.

Physics Physique Fizika•Nov 1, 1965•30 citations

Quantum and semiclassical phase functions for the quantization of symmetric oscillators

A. Matzkin, M. Lombardi

We investigate symmetric oscillators, and in particular their quantization, by employing semiclassical and quantum phase functions introduced in the context of Liouville–Green transformations of the Schrödinger equation. For anharmonic oscillators, first-order semiclassical quantization is seldom accurate and the higher order expansions eventually break down given the asymptotic nature of the series. A quantum phase that allows us in principle to retrieve the exact quantum mechanical quantization condition and wavefunctions is given along with an iterative scheme to compute it. The arbitrariness surrounding quantum phase functions is lifted by supplementing the phase with boundary conditions involving high order semiclassical expansions. This allows us to extend the definition of oscillation numbers, which determine the quantization of the harmonic oscillator, to the anharmonic case. Several illustrations involving homogeneous as well as coupling constant dependant anharmonic oscillators are given.

arXiv:0706.2978•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jun 22, 2005•1 citation

Quantum theory of anharmonic oscillators-a variational and systematic general approximation method

K Yamazaki

This is an investigation of the energy levels and wavefunctions of an anharmonic oscillator characterised by the potential 1/2 (omega 2 q 2 + lambda q 4 ). As a lowest-order approximation an extremely simple formula for energy levels, E i (0) = (i + 1/2)1/4(3/alpha i + alpha i ), is derived (i being the quantum number of the energy level), which covers any (lambda, i). alpha i is the real positive root of a cubic equation: y i alpha i 3 + alpha i 2 - 1 = 0, with y i = 6lambda(2i 2 + 2i + 1)/(2i+1). This formula reproduces the exact energy levels within an error of about 1% for any ( lambda ,i) (the worst case is 2% for i = 0, lambda to infinity). Systematically higher orders of this perturbation theory are developed, which contains the 'usual' perturbation theory for the limiting case of small lambda , but this perturbation theory is valid for any (i, lambda). The second-order perturbation theory reduces the errors of our lowest-order results by a factor of about 1/5 in general. Various ranges (large, intermediate, small) of (i, lambda ) are investigated and compared with the exact values obtained by the Montroll group (1975, 1978). For i = 0, 1, even the fourth-order perturbation calculation can be elaborated explicitly, which reduces the error to about 0.01% for any lambda . For small lambda it gives correct numerical coefficients up to lambda 4 terms, as it should.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Feb 1, 1984•26 citations

Path integral and Sommerfeld quantization

Mikoto Matsuda, Takehisa Fujita

The path integral formulation can reproduce the right energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator potential, but it cannot resolve the Coulomb potential problem. This is because the path integral cannot properly take into account the boundary condition, which is due to the presence of the scattering states in the Coulomb potential system. On the other hand, the Sommerfeld quantization can reproduce the right energy spectrum of both harmonic oscillator and Coulomb potential cases since the boundary condition is effectively taken into account in this semiclassical treatment. The basic difference between the two schemes should be that no constraint is imposed on the wave function in the path integral while the Sommerfeld quantization rule is derived by requiring that the state vector should be a single-valued function. The limitation of the semiclassical method is also clarified in terms of the square well and $δ(x)$ function potential models.

arXiv:1809.04416•Aug 18, 2018•0 citations

Beyond the semiclassical approximation in atom interferometry

W. LaRow, Mark Edwards, Charles A. Sackett

We describe a quantum perturbative approach to evaluating the phase shift of an atom interferometer in a weakly anharmonic trap. This provides a simple way to evaluate quantum corrections to the standard semiclassical approximation. The calculation benefits from the use of generalized coherent states for a basis. We find that the form of the semiclassical approximation remains valid to first order in the anharmonic perturbation, but that phase differences arise because the trajectory of a quantum wave packet will generally deviate from that of a classical particle. The quantum correction to the phase is a factor ${\ensuremath{\ell}}^{2}/{A}^{2}$ smaller than the semiclassical perturbation itself, where $\ensuremath{\ell}$ is the quantum harmonic-oscillator lengthscale, and $A$ is the classical amplitude of the motion. We provide analytical results for one-dimensional perturbations of power 3 through 6 in the position coordinate.

arXiv:2410.08040•Physical Review A•Mar 19, 2025•1 citation

Exact quantization of nonsolvable potentials: the role of the quantum phase beyond the semiclassical approximation

A. Matzkin

Semiclassical quantization is exact only for the so called \emph{solvable} potentials, such as the harmonic oscillator. In the \emph{nonsolvable} case the semiclassical phase, given by a series in $\hbar$, yields more or less approximate results and eventually diverges due to the asymptotic nature of the expansion. A quantum phase is derived to bypass these shortcomings. It achieves exact quantization of nonsolvable potentials and allows to obtain the quantum wavefunction while locally approaching the best pre-divergent semiclassical expansion. An iterative procedure allowing to implement practical calculations with a modest computational cost is also given. The theory is illustrated on two examples for which the limitations of the semiclassical approach were recently highlighted: cold atomic collisions and anharmonic oscillators in the nonperturbative regime.

arXiv:quant-ph/0411084•Nov 11, 2004•0 citations
In the present investigation we assess the relevance of both classically forbidden phenomena and higher-order asymptotic contributions for the semiclassical energy quantization of a particle in the anharmonic oscillator potential V(x)=x 2 /2+ lambda x 4 . We propose an iterative method (Iq) for obtaining higher-order semiclassical corrections, which is similar to the WKB and phase-integral methods in the lowest order, but in higher orders the approximation differs significantly. A 'primitive' Bohr-Sommerfeld energy quantization is compared with a more complete semiclassical quantization, taking into account both complex trajectory contributions and higher-order (quantal) corrections.
With the use of the Weyl correspondence between quantum mechanical operators and classical dynamical functions, an exact quantization rule is derived for a system with one degree of freedom and arbitrary Hamiltonian. In the semiclassical limit of small Planck's constant, this reduces to the Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization rule as derived by the WKB approximation. Higher order terms are also derived. It is further proven that for a simple harmonic oscillator the Bohr-Sommerfeld rule must give the exact energy eigenvalues for all states.
We investigate symmetric oscillators, and in particular their quantization, by employing semiclassical and quantum phase functions introduced in the context of Liouville–Green transformations of the Schrödinger equation. For anharmonic oscillators, first-order semiclassical quantization is seldom accurate and the higher order expansions eventually break down given the asymptotic nature of the series. A quantum phase that allows us in principle to retrieve the exact quantum mechanical quantization condition and wavefunctions is given along with an iterative scheme to compute it. The arbitrariness surrounding quantum phase functions is lifted by supplementing the phase with boundary conditions involving high order semiclassical expansions. This allows us to extend the definition of oscillation numbers, which determine the quantization of the harmonic oscillator, to the anharmonic case. Several illustrations involving homogeneous as well as coupling constant dependant anharmonic oscillators are given.
This is an investigation of the energy levels and wavefunctions of an anharmonic oscillator characterised by the potential 1/2 (omega 2 q 2 + lambda q 4 ). As a lowest-order approximation an extremely simple formula for energy levels, E i (0) = (i + 1/2)1/4(3/alpha i + alpha i ), is derived (i being the quantum number of the energy level), which covers any (lambda, i). alpha i is the real positive root of a cubic equation: y i alpha i 3 + alpha i 2 - 1 = 0, with y i = 6lambda(2i 2 + 2i + 1)/(2i+1). This formula reproduces the exact energy levels within an error of about 1% for any ( lambda ,i) (the worst case is 2% for i = 0, lambda to infinity). Systematically higher orders of this perturbation theory are developed, which contains the 'usual' perturbation theory for the limiting case of small lambda , but this perturbation theory is valid for any (i, lambda). The second-order perturbation theory reduces the errors of our lowest-order results by a factor of about 1/5 in general. Various ranges (large, intermediate, small) of (i, lambda ) are investigated and compared with the exact values obtained by the Montroll group (1975, 1978). For i = 0, 1, even the fourth-order perturbation calculation can be elaborated explicitly, which reduces the error to about 0.01% for any lambda . For small lambda it gives correct numerical coefficients up to lambda 4 terms, as it should.
The path integral formulation can reproduce the right energy spectrum of the harmonic oscillator potential, but it cannot resolve the Coulomb potential problem. This is because the path integral cannot properly take into account the boundary condition, which is due to the presence of the scattering states in the Coulomb potential system. On the other hand, the Sommerfeld quantization can reproduce the right energy spectrum of both harmonic oscillator and Coulomb potential cases since the boundary condition is effectively taken into account in this semiclassical treatment. The basic difference between the two schemes should be that no constraint is imposed on the wave function in the path integral while the Sommerfeld quantization rule is derived by requiring that the state vector should be a single-valued function. The limitation of the semiclassical method is also clarified in terms of the square well and δ(x)δ(x)δ(x) function potential models.
We describe a quantum perturbative approach to evaluating the phase shift of an atom interferometer in a weakly anharmonic trap. This provides a simple way to evaluate quantum corrections to the standard semiclassical approximation. The calculation benefits from the use of generalized coherent states for a basis. We find that the form of the semiclassical approximation remains valid to first order in the anharmonic perturbation, but that phase differences arise because the trajectory of a quantum wave packet will generally deviate from that of a classical particle. The quantum correction to the phase is a factor ${\ensuremath{\ell}}^{2}/{A}^{2}$ smaller than the semiclassical perturbation itself, where $\ensuremath{\ell}$ is the quantum harmonic-oscillator lengthscale, and AAA is the classical amplitude of the motion. We provide analytical results for one-dimensional perturbations of power 3 through 6 in the position coordinate.
Semiclassical quantization is exact only for the so called \emph{solvable} potentials, such as the harmonic oscillator. In the \emph{nonsolvable} case the semiclassical phase, given by a series in ℏ\hbarℏ, yields more or less approximate results and eventually diverges due to the asymptotic nature of the expansion. A quantum phase is derived to bypass these shortcomings. It achieves exact quantization of nonsolvable potentials and allows to obtain the quantum wavefunction while locally approaching the best pre-divergent semiclassical expansion. An iterative procedure allowing to implement practical calculations with a modest computational cost is also given. The theory is illustrated on two examples for which the limitations of the semiclassical approach were recently highlighted: cold atomic collisions and anharmonic oscillators in the nonperturbative regime.