Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Causality problems for Fermi’s two-atom system

Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt

Published Jan 31, 1994• 180 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Let A and B be two atoms or, more generally, a ``source'' and a ``detector'' separated by some distance R. At t=0A is in an excited state, B in its ground state, and no photons are present. A theorem is proved that in contrast to Einstein causality and finite signal velocity the excitation probability of B is nonzero immediately after t=0. Implications are discussed.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.72.596

Related papers

Problems about Causality in Fermi's Two-Atom Model and Possible Resolutions

Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt

In order to check finite propagation speed Fermi, in 1932, had considered two atoms A and B separated by some distance R. At time t=0, A is in an excited state, B in its ground state, and no photons are present. Fermi's idea was to calculate the excitation probability of B. In a model-independent way and with minimal assumptions - Hilbert space and positive energy only - it is proved, not just for atoms but for any systems A and B, that the excitation probability of B is nonzero immediately after t=0. Possible ways out to avoid a contradiction to finite propagation speed are discussed. The notions of strong and weak Einstein causality are introduced.

arXiv:quant-ph/9707016•Jul 7, 1997•4 citations

Analysis of the causal behavior in energy transfer between atoms

Edwin Albert Power, T. Thirunamachandran

A critical analysis of the problem of causality in the energy transfer between a pair of atoms is carried out. One of the pair, the source, is initially excited and the other, the detector, is in its ground state. The probabilities are calculated for the detector to be excited at a later time $t$ under different experimental conditions. In the first, a precise specification is made of the state of the source and that of the radiation field at the observation time $t.$ In the second, the final state of the field is unspecified, whereas in the third, the state of neither the field nor the source is specified at time $t.$ These three cases correspond to predicting the outcomes of different experimental measurements. It is shown that of the three cases, only the third exhibits exact causal behavior. The other two are noncausal. The noncausal contributions to the probability arise from the correlation of vacuum fluctuations at the two atoms at different times in the interval 0 to $t.$ The probabilities for these cases can be significant for times slightly less than $R/c,$ where $R$ is the interatomic separation. Explicit expressions, correct to fourth order in the transition moments, for the probabilities in the three cases are given. A proof of strict causality to all orders is presented for the third case where the final measurement is solely made on the detector. In Appendix A the related problem of the time dependence of the electric energy density associated with the source is analyzed and shown to be causal.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1997•84 citations

Violation of Einstein causality in a model quantum system

Morton H. Rubin

A series of theorems have been proved showing that localization in quantum mechanics is inconsistent with Einstein causality. In this paper a simple model of a localized source and a localized detector is studied. This model does not satisfy the assumptions of the rigorous theorems; nonetheless, it is found that the model violates Einstein causality. The effect is very small and resides in the nonresonant part of the transition probability.

Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields•Jun 15, 1987•47 citations

Fermi Problem with Artificial Atoms in Circuit QED

Carlos Sabín, Marco del Rey, Juan José García‐Ripoll +1 more

We propose a feasible experimental test of a 1D version of the Fermi problem using superconducting qubits. We give an explicit nonperturbative proof of strict causality in this model, showing that the probability of excitation of a two-level artificial atom with a dipolar coupling to a quantum field is completely independent of the other qubit until signals from it may arrive. We explain why this is in perfect agreement with the existence of nonlocal correlations and previous results which were used to claim apparent causality problems for Fermi's two-atom system.

arXiv:1103.4129•Physical Review Letters•Oct 6, 2011•34 citations

Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory

Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt

Abstract In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics the wave‐function of a free particle which initially is in a finite volume immediately spreads to infinity. In a nonrelativistic theory this is of no concern, but we show that the same instantaneous spreading can occur in relativistic quantum theory and that transition probabilities in widely separated systems may instantaneously become nonzero. We discuss how this affects Einstein causality.

Annalen der Physik•Dec 1, 1998•56 citations

Instantaneous spreading and Einstein causality in quantum theory

Gerhard C. Hegerfeldt

In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics the wave-function of a free particle which initially is in a finite volume immediately spreads to infinity. In a nonrelativistic theory this is of no concern, but we show that the same instantaneous spreading can occur in relativistic quantum theory and that transition probabilities in widely separated systems may instantaneously become nonzero. We discuss how this affects Einstein causality.

arXiv:quant-ph/9809030•Annalen der Physik•Dec 1, 1998•92 citations
Let A and B be two atoms or, more generally, a source'' and a detector'' separated by some distance R. At t=0A is in an excited state, B in its ground state, and no photons are present. A theorem is proved that in contrast to Einstein causality and finite signal velocity the excitation probability of B is nonzero immediately after t=0. Implications are discussed.
In order to check finite propagation speed Fermi, in 1932, had considered two atoms A and B separated by some distance R. At time t=0, A is in an excited state, B in its ground state, and no photons are present. Fermi's idea was to calculate the excitation probability of B. In a model-independent way and with minimal assumptions - Hilbert space and positive energy only - it is proved, not just for atoms but for any systems A and B, that the excitation probability of B is nonzero immediately after t=0. Possible ways out to avoid a contradiction to finite propagation speed are discussed. The notions of strong and weak Einstein causality are introduced.
A critical analysis of the problem of causality in the energy transfer between a pair of atoms is carried out. One of the pair, the source, is initially excited and the other, the detector, is in its ground state. The probabilities are calculated for the detector to be excited at a later time ttt under different experimental conditions. In the first, a precise specification is made of the state of the source and that of the radiation field at the observation time t.t.t. In the second, the final state of the field is unspecified, whereas in the third, the state of neither the field nor the source is specified at time t.t.t. These three cases correspond to predicting the outcomes of different experimental measurements. It is shown that of the three cases, only the third exhibits exact causal behavior. The other two are noncausal. The noncausal contributions to the probability arise from the correlation of vacuum fluctuations at the two atoms at different times in the interval 0 to t.t.t. The probabilities for these cases can be significant for times slightly less than R/c,R/c,R/c, where RRR is the interatomic separation. Explicit expressions, correct to fourth order in the transition moments, for the probabilities in the three cases are given. A proof of strict causality to all orders is presented for the third case where the final measurement is solely made on the detector. In Appendix A the related problem of the time dependence of the electric energy density associated with the source is analyzed and shown to be causal.
We propose a feasible experimental test of a 1D version of the Fermi problem using superconducting qubits. We give an explicit nonperturbative proof of strict causality in this model, showing that the probability of excitation of a two-level artificial atom with a dipolar coupling to a quantum field is completely independent of the other qubit until signals from it may arrive. We explain why this is in perfect agreement with the existence of nonlocal correlations and previous results which were used to claim apparent causality problems for Fermi's two-atom system.