Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Quantum Kinematic Approach to the Geometric Phase. I. General Formalism

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda, R. Simon

Published Dec 1, 1993• 452 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1006/aphy.1993.1093

Related papers

Quantum Kinematic Approach to the Geometric Phase. II. The Case of Unitary Group Representations

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda, R. Simon

Annals of Physics•Dec 1, 1993•53 citations

General setting for a geometric phase of mixed states under an arbitrary nonunitary evolution

A. T. Rezakhani, Paolo Zanardi A

The problem of a geometric phase for an open quantum system is reinvestigated in a unifying approach. Two of the existing methods to define geometric phase, one by Uhlmann's approach and the other by a kinematic approach, which have been considered to be distinct, are shown to be related in this framework. The method is based upon purification of a density matrix by its uniform decomposition and a generalization of the parallel transport condition obtained from this decomposition. It is shown that the generalized parallel transport condition can be satisfied when Uhlmann's condition holds. However, it does not mean that all solutions of the generalized parallel transport condition are compatible with those of Uhlmann's. It is also shown how to recover the earlier known definitions of geometric phase as well as how to generalize them when degeneracy exists and varies in time.

arXiv:quant-ph/0507280•Physical Review A•Jan 18, 2006•34 citations

Spin coherent states as anticipators of the geometric phase

P. K. Aravind

Spin coherent states, proposed by several workers in the early 70s, are shown to contain the natural generalization to higher spins of the phase discovered earlier by Pancharatnam for polarized light. They also provide a simple setting in which the geometric phase of Berry and of Aharonov and Anandan can be exhibited and some of its further properties, noted by Samuel and Bhandari, can be illustrated. It is pointed out how many of the foregoing results might have been deduced in the 70s by proceeding in strict analogy with the earlier work of Pancharatnam. A similar point is made in connection with the geometric phase of SU(1,1) coherent states. In addition to its possible historical interest, this approach shows how the concept of the geometric phase can be introduced and developed in a largely kinematic fashion as an addendum to the standard quantum theory of angular momentum.

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1999•12 citations

Quantum kinematics and geometric quantization

Zhao Qiang

Journal of Geometry and Physics•Dec 1, 1996•2 citations

Kinematic Approach to the Mixed State Geometric Phase in Nonunitary Evolution

D. M. Tong, Erik Sjöqvist, L. C. Kwek +1 more

A kinematic approach to the geometric phase for mixed quantal states in nonunitary evolution is proposed. This phase is manifestly gauge invariant and can be experimentally tested in interferometry. It leads to well-known results when the evolution is unitary.

arXiv:quant-ph/0405092•Physical Review Letters•Aug 20, 2004•318 citations

Quantum kinematics and geometry

Mario Schönberg

Il Nuovo Cimento•Feb 1, 1957•25 citations
The problem of a geometric phase for an open quantum system is reinvestigated in a unifying approach. Two of the existing methods to define geometric phase, one by Uhlmann's approach and the other by a kinematic approach, which have been considered to be distinct, are shown to be related in this framework. The method is based upon purification of a density matrix by its uniform decomposition and a generalization of the parallel transport condition obtained from this decomposition. It is shown that the generalized parallel transport condition can be satisfied when Uhlmann's condition holds. However, it does not mean that all solutions of the generalized parallel transport condition are compatible with those of Uhlmann's. It is also shown how to recover the earlier known definitions of geometric phase as well as how to generalize them when degeneracy exists and varies in time.
Spin coherent states, proposed by several workers in the early 70s, are shown to contain the natural generalization to higher spins of the phase discovered earlier by Pancharatnam for polarized light. They also provide a simple setting in which the geometric phase of Berry and of Aharonov and Anandan can be exhibited and some of its further properties, noted by Samuel and Bhandari, can be illustrated. It is pointed out how many of the foregoing results might have been deduced in the 70s by proceeding in strict analogy with the earlier work of Pancharatnam. A similar point is made in connection with the geometric phase of SU(1,1) coherent states. In addition to its possible historical interest, this approach shows how the concept of the geometric phase can be introduced and developed in a largely kinematic fashion as an addendum to the standard quantum theory of angular momentum.