Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Lattice models and integrability: a special issue in honour of F Y Wu

Anthony John Guttmann, Jesper Lykke Jacobsen

Published Nov 27, 2012• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Fa Yueh (Fred) Wu was born on 5 January 1932 in Nanking (now known as Nanjing), China, the capital of the Nationalist government. Wu began kindergarten in 1937 in a comfortable setting, as his father held a relatively high government position. But the Sino–Japanese war broke out in July 1937, and Nanking fell to Japanese hands in November. Fleeing the Japanese, his parents brought Wu to their hometown in Hunan, and then to the war capital Chungking (now Chongqing) in 1938, where they lived for eight years until the end of the war. Around that time the Japanese began bombing Chungking, and Wu's childhood memories were dominated by air raids, bombings and burning not dissimilar to those experienced by Londoners during the war. At times the air raids lasted for days disrupting everyday lives in Chungking, including Wu's schooling. One day during a fierce bombing raid, a bomb fell in their garden reducing a pavilion and the surrounding pond to a huge crater; another bomb fell just a few metres from the tunnel where his family took shelter, almost sealing the only entrance. The family moved the very next day to the countryside. As a result of the war, Wu attended seven schools before finishing his primary education. Fortunately, by the time he entered junior high school in 1943, the Japanese forces were on the wane and Wu entered the elite middle school, Nankai. His early academic performance in Nankai seemed to him mediocre, but he nevertheless impressed his geometry teacher by showing bursts of talent. With hindsight, this early interest in geometry may have led to his later insights in graphical analyses of statistical systems. The family returned to Nanking in 1946 after the Victory over Japan Day. By this time his father had become elected to the Legislative Yuan, the equivalent of the US Senate. Wu entered high school in Nanking in 1946. Since he came from an elite school in Chungking, he excelled in most of his classes, especially mathematics. Notwithstanding his academic success, Wu probably spent more time playing Chinese chess, a board game similar to international chess. He ranked high in a city-wide tournament and often played blind-folded games. He also spent time playing bridge, a game he learned in Nankai and kept up throughout his years in the US. He also loved puzzles and riddles. But the good days did not last long, as the civil war drew closer to Nanking with the Communists winning. The family fled Nanking once again, following a zigzag path and traveling by boat, train, car and then by boat again, eventually reaching Taiwan in June 1949. By this time, the Nationalists had lost most of China, and there was no hope of returning to the mainland. Wu entered the Naval College of Technology to study electrical engineering, giving up an opportunity to study mathematics in the National Taiwan University, although his real interest was in mathematics. In 1954, Wu graduated from the Naval College with a BS degree and the commission of Ensign. Recognizing his outstanding academic record in the College, the Chinese Navy sent him to the US in 1955 to study radar and sonar and to receive training as an instructor. He stayed at the Naval School of Electronics in San Francisco and at the Instructor's School in San Diego. Wu felt that he benefited from the instructor's training much more than from the electronics school, as the training helped him to develop teaching and presentation skills that served him well throughout his career. The Navy assigned him to teach electronics in the Naval Academy when he returned to Taiwan in 1956. Wu was interested in attending a graduate school. The only institution that offered a graduate degree in Taiwan at the time was Taiwan's newly re-established Tsing Hua University. In its hurried retreat to Taiwan, the Nationalist government left the original Tsing Hua University, one of China's best-known institutions of higher learning with a history dating back to the 19th century, behind in Beijing. In 1956, after gaining footing in Taiwan, the Nationalist government revived Tsing Hua, and began offering a two-year Master's degree in nuclear science. Wu decided to apply for admission but faced considerable obstacles since he was in the Navy. After one year's effort, mostly on his father's part, Wu finally entered Tsing Hua in 1957. He completed the two-year program with an experimental thesis in 1959. By this time, the US was pushing for a scientific renaissance after the launch of the Soviet satellite Sputnik. Wu received offers of teaching assistantships from several physics departments in the US, and chose to continue his graduate education at Washington University in St. Louis in 1959. At Washington University he studied many-body theory under the late Eugene Feenberg and produced several influential papers [1, 2] on ground state properties of liquid helium-3 and liquid helium-4. In 1963, he published a paper on formulating cluster expansions in an N -body problem [3], extending the Mayer expansion to systems with indexed many-body interactions, which appeared to have escaped the attention of the community of statistical physics that it deserved. The expansion made extensive use of graphical terms, demonstrating his prowess in graphical analysis at an early stage of his career. Wu's interest in many-body theory continued over the years, with subsequent works on the electron gas, adsorbed systems, and the long-perplexing problem of density correlations in Fermi and Bose systems. After obtaining his PhD from Washington University in 1963, Wu went on to teach at Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VPI) as an assistant professor. In February 1967, Wu met Elliott Lieb who was visiting VPI to give a talk on the Bethe ansatz evaluation of the entropy of two-dimensional ice, a 6-vertex model. Wu soon realized the underlying graphical aspects of two-dimensional vertex models and solved the thermodynamics of a related 5-vertex model using the Pfaffian approach. The result was published in the April issue of Physical Review Letters (PRL) of the same year [4], and in September 1967, Wu moved to Northeastern University to join Lieb's group. Wu taught at Northeastern for 39 years until his retirement in 2006 as the Matthews Distinguished University Professor of Physics. Over the years, Wu has published more than 230 papers and monographs, and he continues to publish after retirement. Most of his research since 1967 is in exact and rigorous analyses of lattice models and integrable systems, which is the theme of this special issue. In 1968, after Wu's arrival at Northeastern, Lieb and Wu obtained the exact solution of the ground state of the one-dimensional Hubbard model and published the result in PRL [5], a work which has since become highly important after the advent of high-temperature superconductivity. This Lieb–Wu paper and Wu's 1982 review of the Potts model in Reviews of Modern Physics [37] are among the most cited papers in condensed matter physics. Later in 1968 Lieb departed Northeastern for MIT. As a result, the full version of the solution was not published until 34 years later [38] when Lieb and Wu collaborated to work on the manuscript on the occasion of Wu's 70th birthday. Wu spent the summer of 1968 at Stony Brook as the guest of C N Yang. Working with Yang's student, C Fan, he extended the Pfaffian solution of the Ising model to general lattices and termed such models 'free-fermion', a term now in common use [6]. In 1972, Wu visited R J Baxter, whom he had met earlier in 1968 at MIT, in Canberra, Australia, with the support of a Fulbright grant. They solved the triangular-lattice Ising model with 3-spin interactions [7], a model now known as the Baxter–Wu model. It was an ideal collaboration. While Baxter derived the solution algebraically, Wu used graphical methods to reduce the problem to an Ashkin–Teller model, which greatly simplifies the presentation. While in Canberra, Wu also studied the 8-vertex model on the honeycomb lattice [8], a model which proved to be useful in his later research. In 1973, Wu returned to Tsing Hua as a visiting professor and worked with colleague K Y Lin. They published two important papers introducing staggered vertex models for the first time [10, 11]. In other important work they clarified the nature of the phase diagram of the Ashkin–Teller model, and found it to have two phase transitions [9]. In the 1970s Wu traveled to Taiwan, Australia, Europe and to China when it re-opened. He met H N V Temperley in Aberdeen, Scotland in 1976, and collaborated with H J Brascamp and H Kunz in Lausanne to establish a number of rigorous results on vertex models, including a proof of the equivalence of boundary conditions for the 6-vertex model [13, 14]. From 1979 to 1980, Wu resided in the Netherlands and Germany, where he was the guest of Piet Kasteleyn at Leiden, Hans van Leeuwen at Delft and Kurt Binder in Juelich. It was in Juelich that Wu completed the 1982 review paper on the Potts model [37], a paper that has been cited 70 or more times every year since its publication. Another important work in that period is a 1976 graphical analysis of the Potts model on the triangular lattice in collaboration with Baxter and Kelland [15]. This paper provided an elegant and conceptually easy description of the duality relation of the model, complementary to the algebraic analysis of Temperley and Lieb [16]. Four years later, Wu and Lin further refined the graphical aspects to reduce the model to a 5-vertex model, under which the duality relation appears as a simple spatial symmetry [18]. The Wu–Lin formulation of the Potts model is used by Jacobsen and Sculland in an analysis of the kagome-lattice Potts model in their first paper in this issue [39]. In other pioneering work in 1976, Wu and Y K Wang introduced a spin model with chiral interactions and its duality relation in Fourier space [19]. Prior to that time, studies of spin models had invariably been confined to models with symmetric interactions. In 1977 Wu published an influential paper on spanning trees [20]. In it, he derived the spanning tree constants of the regular two-dimensional lattices. Since then, he has been the co-author of several papers extending this work to a variety of other two-dimensional Archimedean lattices [21–23]. In this issue Guttmann 1 and Rogers solve the three-dimensional version of this problem, which has resisted attack for more than 30 years [40]. The connection between spanning trees and dimers was previously highlighted by Neville Temperley in 1974 [17]. The ideas from number theory needed to obtain the spanning tree constant of three-dimensional lattices, notably logarithmic Mahler measures, are further discussed in the article by Glasser 2 in this issue [41]. Wu has had a long and productive collaboration with Maillard, particularly on aspects of the Ising model. Maillard also wrote the definitive description of Wu's many scientific contributions at the time of Wu's 70th birthday [24]. The paper was later included among the biographies of great names such as Newton and Feynman in the History of Physics: Individual Biographies section in the MIT Net Advance of Physics website [59]. Further developments in the Ising model are highlighted in the article by Boukraa, Hassani and Maillard 3 in this issue [42]. Maillard's article also appears as the introduction to a wonderful collection of Wu's works that appeared in 2009 [25], entitled Exactly Solved Models: A Journey in Statistical Mechanics. The relation between bond percolation and the random-cluster formulation of the Potts model was pioneered by Kasteleyn and Fortuin in 1969 [26]. Later, in a 1977 paper, Wu showed how to rederive this relation in a different setting and used it to obtain various quantities of interest in the bond percolation problem, including critical exponents, from the exact solution of the Potts model [27]. A few months later, in collaboration with Kunz, he showed that site percolation can also be related to the Potts model [28]. Problems in bond percolation are treated in this issue by several works. The paper by Hu, Blöte 4 and Deng 5 investigates how the imposition of a 'canonical' constraint, that there be an equal number of open and closed edges, affects the universal properties [43]. The paper by Ziff 6 , Scullard, Wierman and Sedlock exactly solves inhomogeneous percolation on lattices of the bow-tie and checkerboard types [44]. In a 1979 paper on Potts model critical points, Wu proposed a conjecture, now known as the homogeneity hypothesis, on the location of the critical point of the kagome lattice [29]. Since then, numerous studies have been carried out to test the validity of that conjecture [12]. However, many of these tests proved to be inconclusive since they produced results extremely close to the conjectured value. The puzzle is finally solved by Jacobsen and Scullard in their two papers in this issue [39, 45]. Using a graphical analysis based on the Wu–Lin 5-vertex formulation, they recover the Wu conjecture of the kagome-lattice critical point as the first-order approximation in a well-defined graphical analysis. This establishes once and for all the approximate nature of the Wu conjecture. These investigations, and the exact solutions found by Wu, raised the question as to the conditions under which a lattice model is exactly solvable. Quite recently, such questions have been addressed through the technique of discrete holomorphicity (DH). This direction is represented in this issue by the contributions of Alam and Batchelor 7 , where the connection between DH and Yang–Baxter integrability is investigated [46]. DH is also a key ingredient in recent rigorous proofs that certain lattice models converge, in the continuum limit, to conformally invariant probabilistic processes known as Schramm–Loewner evolution (SLE). The theme of SLE appears within this issue in the article by Alberts, Kozdron and Lawler [47]. Finally, DH observables are used in this issue by Duminil-Copin to prove the divergence of the correlation length for the Potts model (in its formulation in terms of Fortuin–Kasteleyn clusters) when 1 ⩽ q ⩽ 4 [48]. Establishing the phase diagrams of lattice models is a recurrent theme in Wu's works. In an interesting but little-known work from 2000 with Guo and Blöte [30], he has shown that, contrary to common belief, the O( n ) model on the honeycomb lattice has a second-order phase transition for n > 2. The question of phase diagrams for O( n )-type models is taken up in this issue by Blöte, Wang and Guo 8 [49]. In 1983–84, Wu the National as the of the for His was to in condensed matter theory in the US. The in Washington offered Wu a of condensed matter physics research in US an that proved useful to his later his Wu has on the general of graphical analysis to a variety of lattices. This was highlighted in his paper on the Potts model and theory in which he derived a number of with and on for the and correlation earlier result in the same is the equivalence of the Potts model on a with a model on the found in 1976 in collaboration with Baxter and Kelland [15]. on these and on recent in the to and properties of percolation and Potts models on in their to this issue Wu has published on His work exact on and with a boundary In this and on the which is an of a Another is the paper by and of a with a in the Wu has also worked in He has based on statistical models and published a review of for which the connection of with statistical In Wu a formulation of which the of the exact of the between two in He later extended the formulation to a work which has since interest in in research. These works can be as a of Wu's Navy training in more than years In recent years Wu has this in work with , who with has related work on lattice in this issue A paper by and also appears Wu has made other contributions to for in relation to dimers in his recent where he also results from This is taken up by the article of in this issue In Wu in a paper, a formulation of duality of Potts correlation for n on the boundary of a lattice He the of n 2 and and that the formulation can be extended to higher of n a But the is by no and its solution was eventually found by Wu and his H Y They found that the correlation are not all when n 4 and They also the correlations in terms of the the interest in integrable systems the of statistical physics. and have appeared in in and in the study of certain between and known under the common of This last is represented in this issue by the of of Wu in and systems are in the article by , and and in the paper by and on This paper appears very since it is by the carried out in the of who the in Physics. Wu met his in They in in St. They have a Professor of at the University of San a and a teacher of and a in at and have Wu left behind when he left China in and with after a for the first time in and one are now and his who also has lives a comfortable in retirement in It has been a to this collection of papers on the occasion of and to him for much of the on which this introduction is are also to all the for such a and very of the of lattice models and and for the to the of this issue before the year to an Wu continues to be a highly and to a of him many more years of a and 1 Wu met Guttmann at the University of Australia, back in when Guttmann him to Over the years their have times at and and during Wu's to and to their close in the with Wu's in when they visited 2 Wu met Glasser in 1968 at MIT and also visited him later at They collaborated in on a paper later published in the in in which they an for the entropy of spanning trees on the triangular 3 Wu and Maillard research between the and the They also in Taiwan and at including one in on the Yang–Baxter in They have many including one of Wu's a paper on In that paper they the term a rigorous 4 Blöte and Wu first met in in Since then they have visited other as Blöte made regular to the University of and University, those of They first collaborated in a paper in which they obtained a for the critical of the honeycomb Ising model and the analysis. This of an a analysis the of Wu's later with Blöte and his 5 Deng obtained his PhD in under the direction of Blöte at Wu served on and in his 6 Wu's recent works on the Potts model he to Ziff They and and often had on points, including the use and of the term 7 Wu and Batchelor met at the National University in and in and their have at many and 8 Guo obtained his PhD under the of Blöte in Wu and Guo other well from Wu's to the University where he is an professor. He has collaborated with on the of analysis using the in several of his recent Wu first met at College, in Wu's 2006 of the of an N in the of a they forces in at a in and derived the expansion of that in and Wu and collaborated in a paper in 2000 on the exact solution of a 6-vertex model with bond Most they collaborated on the exact of dimers on a with a boundary Wu's with Jacobsen back to this when the out this in a to Wu's first paper on this They have since on various most at a at the Newton Institute in is another of They have met at numerous and In one in Wu's attention to a three-dimensional spin model on the lattice that appeared to be They soon solved the Ising model on that In they collaborated on a paper obtaining the phase diagram of a model.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/45/49/490301

Related papers

Quantum chaos and integrability in partially distinguishable fermions on a 1D lattice

•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Statistical models, Yang-Baxter equation and related topics : proceedings of the satellite meetings of STATPHYS-19, Tianjin, China, 8-10 August 1995 ; and Symmetry, statistical mechanical models and applciations : proceedings of the Seventh Nankai Workshop, Tianjin, China, 12-13 August 1995

Mo‐Lin Ge, Fa Yueh Wu

Part 1 Satellite meeting of Statphys-19: quantum domains in ferromagnetic anisotropic Heisenberg chains, F.C. Alcaraz et al algebraic solution of the coincidence problem for crystals and quasi crystals, M. Baake reflection equations and surface critical phenomena, M.T. Batchelor quantum field theories in terms of group-valued local fields - an overview, L.L. Chau U(1)-invariant local and integrable lattice formulation of the massive Thirring model, C. Destri dilute algebras and solvable lattice models, U. Grimm quantum group and the Hofstadter problem, Y. Hatsugai et al domain walls in the spin-S quantum Ising chain, M. Henkel mutual exclusion statistics in the exactly solvable model of the Mott metal-insulator transition, M. Kohmoto et al boundary Yang-Baxter in the RSOS/SOS representation, W.M. Koo and C. Ahn probability of phase separation and two point temperature correlation functions for the Bose gas with delta interaction, V.E. Korepin and A.R. Its the generalized chiral clock model and its phase diagram, H. Au-Yang and J.H.H. Perk stochastic reaction-diffusion processes, operator algebras and integrable quantum spin chains, G.M. Schutz vertex-face correspondence in elliptic solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation, Y. Shibukawa logarithmic anomalies of susceptibility for solvable models, M. Takahashi on chiral Hubbard model at strong interaction, D.F. Wang soluble free-fermion models in d dimensions, F.Y. Wu bosonization based on Bethe Ansatz equations and proof of the conformal conjecture, Y.S. Wu and Y Yu. Part 3 The seventh Nankai workshop: one dimensional lattice models of electrons with r2 hopping and exchange, Ch. Gruber and D.F. Wang symmetry group invariants for spontaneous magnetization, J.-M. Maillard Zamolodchikov-Faddeev algebra vertex models, H.-P. Eckle scaling properties of the Ising model in a field, U. Grimm and B. Nienhuis experimental realizations of integrable reaction-diffusion processes in biological and chemical systems, G.M. Schutz and other papers. (Part contents).

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations

Form Factors in Integrable Lattice Models (量子場の理論)

均 今野

素粒子論研究•Apr 20, 1994•0 citations

Contributions to theory of quantum spin models: 60th anniversary of Oleg Derzhko

Strečka, Verkholyak

conferred him PhD degree after successful defense of PhD thesis entitled "Statistical theory of partially excited systems", which Oleg elaborated under the guidance of Professor Ihor Yukhnovskii and Professor Roman Levitskii.Over the past few decades Oleg Derzhko has been scientifically working at the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Lviv, at first, as a research associate at the former Lviv Division of the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the UkrSSR (since 1982), and finally as head of Department for Theory of Model Spin Systems (2003-2016) and head of Department for Quantum Statistics (since 2016 up till now).During this period, he has also performed a long-term lecturing of several courses of theoretical physics at Ivan Franko National University in Lviv and Lviv Polytechnic National University.Oleg's scientific interests cover various modern problems of condensed matter physics and statistical physics.At the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics in Lviv OlegDerzhko has successfully developed a research direction, which is primarily focused on the state-of-theart problems of quantum spin models with a particular emphasis on the exactly solvable models and is already recognized worldwide.In addition to this challenging research topic in its own right, Oleg has a lot of other scientific interests including, but not limited to, unsolved problems of phase transitions of atomic liquids.It is impossible to summarize here all Oleg's achievements, so let us briefly review at least a few most important milestones of his scientific career.Early-career scientific contributions of Oleg Derzhko were devoted to equilibrium properties of partially excited gas and an influence of resonance irradiation upon a liquid-gas phase transition [1].He did not stop taking interest in this topic across his entire scientific career.The further research in this direction has been developing mainly in collaboration with Dr. Vasyl Myhal where their joint efforts are focused on the properties of a two-phase fluid of two-level atoms, the part of which is excited.Among other matters, Oleg and Vasyl brought a deeper understanding into the vapor-to-liquid transition, wetting under electromagnetic resonance irradiation, a microscopic theory of photonucleation with the special emphasis laid on nucleation phenomena in an electric field, surface tension, cavitation and so on [2][3][4].Exactly solvable problems in general and particularly one-dimensional quantum XY models and quantum Ising models in a transverse magnetic field have apparently become Oleg's greatest scientific passion and delight, where he substantially extended the rigorous results with the help of Jordan-Wigner fermionization technique [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].To this end, Oleg Derzhko and his collaborators, which were predominantly from the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics in Lviv, have nontrivially adapted the recipé originally envisaged in a seminal paper by Lieb, Schultz, and Mattis [20].A big step forward at that time was the formulation of the exact numerical method for the calculation of time-dependent spin correlation functions and the corresponding structure factors [5][6][7].Exact solutions for numerous random and periodic non-uniform versions of quantum XY and Ising models achieved by Oleg and by his research group brought a considerable progress in theoretical understanding of a lot of exciting phenomena emergent in one-dimensional quantum spin chains.For instance, in this field of study Oleg has significantly contributed to a clarification of the effect of regular nonuniformity, randomness and correlated disorder on static and dynamical properties of several exactly solved quantum XY and Ising chains [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].Oleg achieved another important breakthrough in this research area by a detailed examination of spin-Peierls instabilities of a certain class of quantum XY chains [15][16][17], as well as, quantum phase transitions and the dynamics of exactly solved XY chains with three-site interactions [16,18,19].

Condensed Matter Physics•Dec 1, 2020•1 citation

Violations of local equilibrium and linear response in classical lattice theories (熱場の量子論とその応用)

健一郎 青木, Dimitri Kusnezov

素粒子論研究•Apr 20, 2002•0 citations

Adilet Imambekov

Dmitry A. Abanin, L. I. Glazman, Eugene Demler

A rising star in the field of quantum many-body physics, Adilet Imambekov died on 18 July 2012 at age 30 while climbing Khan Tengri mountain in Kazakhstan. Despite his youth, Adilet made key contributions to the field of strongly correlated systems; in particular, he devised a new conceptual framework for describing universal dynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems. Adilet’s work was distinguished by a combination of deep physical insight, mathematical rigor, and elegance.Born on 2 September 1981, Adilet grew up in Zhambyl (now Taraz) and Almaty, Kazakhstan. His extraordinary abilities were evident by age 14, when he won national physics and mathematics competitions, then attended one of the former Soviet Union’s best science high schools, Kolmogorov Lyceum in Moscow. Adilet became the first student in 14 years to graduate with highest honors. As a physics Olympiads competitor, he took first-place prizes in the 1997 and 1998 National Russian Olympiads and received a gold medal at the 1998 International Physics Olympiad.Adilet continued his studies at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. In his junior year, he passed several Landau Theoretical Minimum exams. He then received his basic theoretical physics training as a member of the Laudau Institute’s theoretical group.After going to Harvard University in 2002 for his PhD studies, Adilet joined the group of one of us (Demler) and concentrated on many-body physics of cold atoms. His first work, which still serves as a guide for new experiments, predicted numerous exotic states for bosons with nonzero spin in an optical lattice.With his unique ability to fuse ideas from solid-state physics, atomic physics, and mathematics, Adilet was able to make progress in difficult problems when other attempts failed. His approach to the problem of interference between low-dimensional Bose condensates provides a good example. Adilet came up with a beautiful mapping of the problem at hand onto a seemingly unrelated one of statistical properties of random surfaces. His work became instrumental for the interpretation of subsequent experiments in which a new universal dynamical phenomenon, prethermalization, was demonstrated.Adilet uniquely combined mathematical intuition with deep insight into the physics of quantum phenomena. He went to Yale University to work with another of us (Glazman) as a postdoc in 2007 and became interested in the dynamics of 1D quantum fluids, conventionally described by the widely known Luttinger liquid theory. In simplifying the problem, the standard theory artificially imposes symmetry that distorts a fluid’s true dynamic response functions; Adilet’s contributions were essential to building a theory free of such artificial assumptions. He combined the existing perturbative results with his own analysis of an integrable Lieb–Liniger model and foresaw the emerging universal dynamic properties of a fluid.Less than a year later, Adilet built what he called the nonlinear Luttinger liquid theory, which universally describes low-energy excitations of a fluid made of particles with a generic, nonlinear dispersion relation. The theory’s beauty is in its simplicity and versatility. It answered the existing questions about the dynamic responses while also providing a platform for tackling other, more difficult issues. While Adilet was making big strides toward developing a theory of quantum quenches and a kinetic theory of nonlinear Luttinger liquid, he joined Rice University as a junior faculty member in 2009.Remarkably, Adilet’s demeanor did not change despite the challenges of being a tenure-track faculty member. He remained warm and open. He quickly forged collaborations with his Rice colleagues and ventured into, for him, a new area of solid-state optics.Adilet pursued his interests with utmost commitment. For example, when he began graduate school at Harvard, he became fascinated with climbing, mountaineering, and endurance sports. He started training nearly every day, which included running along the Charles River and rock climbing in New Hampshire when possible. Within a few years, he conquered two challenging mountains in Alaska and China and became rather well known among climbers. He also twice qualified for the Boston Marathon, and in May 2012 he won his only Ironman triathlon competition.Each of us cherished every opportunity to talk to or collaborate with Adilet. He had a wonderful sense of humor and often brightened even the most challenging and confusing physics topic with an unexpected joke.Adilet’s commitment and love of life inspired many of his friends to pursue their own dreams. He showed by example that little is impossible if you are dedicated. Before going on his last trip to Kazakhstan, Adilet was talking to one of us about how one should attempt to get the most valuable result in the most intellectually challenging problem rather than concentrating on getting every paper published: “There is simply too little time,” he said. Indeed, Adilet was given very little time. But it was enough for him to make long-lasting contributions to physics and to deeply affect the lives of those who were fortunate enough to know him. Adilet Imambekov DANIEL E. PROBER, YALE UNIVERSITYPPT|High resolution© 2013 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Mar 29, 2013•0 citations
Fa Yueh (Fred) Wu was born on 5 January 1932 in Nanking (now known as Nanjing), China, the capital of the Nationalist government. Wu began kindergarten in 1937 in a comfortable setting, as his father held a relatively high government position. But the Sino–Japanese war broke out in July 1937, and Nanking fell to Japanese hands in November. Fleeing the Japanese, his parents brought Wu to their hometown in Hunan, and then to the war capital Chungking (now Chongqing) in 1938, where they lived for eight years until the end of the war. Around that time the Japanese began bombing Chungking, and Wu's childhood memories were dominated by air raids, bombings and burning not dissimilar to those experienced by Londoners during the war. At times the air raids lasted for days disrupting everyday lives in Chungking, including Wu's schooling. One day during a fierce bombing raid, a bomb fell in their garden reducing a pavilion and the surrounding pond to a huge crater; another bomb fell just a few metres from the tunnel where his family took shelter, almost sealing the only entrance. The family moved the very next day to the countryside. As a result of the war, Wu attended seven schools before finishing his primary education. Fortunately, by the time he entered junior high school in 1943, the Japanese forces were on the wane and Wu entered the elite middle school, Nankai. His early academic performance in Nankai seemed to him mediocre, but he nevertheless impressed his geometry teacher by showing bursts of talent. With hindsight, this early interest in geometry may have led to his later insights in graphical analyses of statistical systems. The family returned to Nanking in 1946 after the Victory over Japan Day. By this time his father had become elected to the Legislative Yuan, the equivalent of the US Senate. Wu entered high school in Nanking in 1946. Since he came from an elite school in Chungking, he excelled in most of his classes, especially mathematics. Notwithstanding his academic success, Wu probably spent more time playing Chinese chess, a board game similar to international chess. He ranked high in a city-wide tournament and often played blind-folded games. He also spent time playing bridge, a game he learned in Nankai and kept up throughout his years in the US. He also loved puzzles and riddles. But the good days did not last long, as the civil war drew closer to Nanking with the Communists winning. The family fled Nanking once again, following a zigzag path and traveling by boat, train, car and then by boat again, eventually reaching Taiwan in June 1949. By this time, the Nationalists had lost most of China, and there was no hope of returning to the mainland. Wu entered the Naval College of Technology to study electrical engineering, giving up an opportunity to study mathematics in the National Taiwan University, although his real interest was in mathematics. In 1954, Wu graduated from the Naval College with a BS degree and the commission of Ensign. Recognizing his outstanding academic record in the College, the Chinese Navy sent him to the US in 1955 to study radar and sonar and to receive training as an instructor. He stayed at the Naval School of Electronics in San Francisco and at the Instructor's School in San Diego. Wu felt that he benefited from the instructor's training much more than from the electronics school, as the training helped him to develop teaching and presentation skills that served him well throughout his career. The Navy assigned him to teach electronics in the Naval Academy when he returned to Taiwan in 1956. Wu was interested in attending a graduate school. The only institution that offered a graduate degree in Taiwan at the time was Taiwan's newly re-established Tsing Hua University. In its hurried retreat to Taiwan, the Nationalist government left the original Tsing Hua University, one of China's best-known institutions of higher learning with a history dating back to the 19th century, behind in Beijing. In 1956, after gaining footing in Taiwan, the Nationalist government revived Tsing Hua, and began offering a two-year Master's degree in nuclear science. Wu decided to apply for admission but faced considerable obstacles since he was in the Navy. After one year's effort, mostly on his father's part, Wu finally entered Tsing Hua in 1957. He completed the two-year program with an experimental thesis in 1959. By this time, the US was pushing for a scientific renaissance after the launch of the Soviet satellite Sputnik. Wu received offers of teaching assistantships from several physics departments in the US, and chose to continue his graduate education at Washington University in St. Louis in 1959. At Washington University he studied many-body theory under the late Eugene Feenberg and produced several influential papers [1, 2] on ground state properties of liquid helium-3 and liquid helium-4. In 1963, he published a paper on formulating cluster expansions in an N -body problem [3], extending the Mayer expansion to systems with indexed many-body interactions, which appeared to have escaped the attention of the community of statistical physics that it deserved. The expansion made extensive use of graphical terms, demonstrating his prowess in graphical analysis at an early stage of his career. Wu's interest in many-body theory continued over the years, with subsequent works on the electron gas, adsorbed systems, and the long-perplexing problem of density correlations in Fermi and Bose systems. After obtaining his PhD from Washington University in 1963, Wu went on to teach at Virginia Polytechnic Institute (VPI) as an assistant professor. In February 1967, Wu met Elliott Lieb who was visiting VPI to give a talk on the Bethe ansatz evaluation of the entropy of two-dimensional ice, a 6-vertex model. Wu soon realized the underlying graphical aspects of two-dimensional vertex models and solved the thermodynamics of a related 5-vertex model using the Pfaffian approach. The result was published in the April issue of Physical Review Letters (PRL) of the same year [4], and in September 1967, Wu moved to Northeastern University to join Lieb's group. Wu taught at Northeastern for 39 years until his retirement in 2006 as the Matthews Distinguished University Professor of Physics. Over the years, Wu has published more than 230 papers and monographs, and he continues to publish after retirement. Most of his research since 1967 is in exact and rigorous analyses of lattice models and integrable systems, which is the theme of this special issue. In 1968, after Wu's arrival at Northeastern, Lieb and Wu obtained the exact solution of the ground state of the one-dimensional Hubbard model and published the result in PRL [5], a work which has since become highly important after the advent of high-temperature superconductivity. This Lieb–Wu paper and Wu's 1982 review of the Potts model in Reviews of Modern Physics [37] are among the most cited papers in condensed matter physics. Later in 1968 Lieb departed Northeastern for MIT. As a result, the full version of the solution was not published until 34 years later [38] when Lieb and Wu collaborated to work on the manuscript on the occasion of Wu's 70th birthday. Wu spent the summer of 1968 at Stony Brook as the guest of C N Yang. Working with Yang's student, C Fan, he extended the Pfaffian solution of the Ising model to general lattices and termed such models 'free-fermion', a term now in common use [6]. In 1972, Wu visited R J Baxter, whom he had met earlier in 1968 at MIT, in Canberra, Australia, with the support of a Fulbright grant. They solved the triangular-lattice Ising model with 3-spin interactions [7], a model now known as the Baxter–Wu model. It was an ideal collaboration. While Baxter derived the solution algebraically, Wu used graphical methods to reduce the problem to an Ashkin–Teller model, which greatly simplifies the presentation. While in Canberra, Wu also studied the 8-vertex model on the honeycomb lattice [8], a model which proved to be useful in his later research. In 1973, Wu returned to Tsing Hua as a visiting professor and worked with colleague K Y Lin. They published two important papers introducing staggered vertex models for the first time [10, 11]. In other important work they clarified the nature of the phase diagram of the Ashkin–Teller model, and found it to have two phase transitions [9]. In the 1970s Wu traveled to Taiwan, Australia, Europe and to China when it re-opened. He met H N V Temperley in Aberdeen, Scotland in 1976, and collaborated with H J Brascamp and H Kunz in Lausanne to establish a number of rigorous results on vertex models, including a proof of the equivalence of boundary conditions for the 6-vertex model [13, 14]. From 1979 to 1980, Wu resided in the Netherlands and Germany, where he was the guest of Piet Kasteleyn at Leiden, Hans van Leeuwen at Delft and Kurt Binder in Juelich. It was in Juelich that Wu completed the 1982 review paper on the Potts model [37], a paper that has been cited 70 or more times every year since its publication. Another important work in that period is a 1976 graphical analysis of the Potts model on the triangular lattice in collaboration with Baxter and Kelland [15]. This paper provided an elegant and conceptually easy description of the duality relation of the model, complementary to the algebraic analysis of Temperley and Lieb [16]. Four years later, Wu and Lin further refined the graphical aspects to reduce the model to a 5-vertex model, under which the duality relation appears as a simple spatial symmetry [18]. The Wu–Lin formulation of the Potts model is used by Jacobsen and Sculland in an analysis of the kagome-lattice Potts model in their first paper in this issue [39]. In other pioneering work in 1976, Wu and Y K Wang introduced a spin model with chiral interactions and its duality relation in Fourier space [19]. Prior to that time, studies of spin models had invariably been confined to models with symmetric interactions. In 1977 Wu published an influential paper on spanning trees [20]. In it, he derived the spanning tree constants of the regular two-dimensional lattices. Since then, he has been the co-author of several papers extending this work to a variety of other two-dimensional Archimedean lattices [21–23]. In this issue Guttmann 1 and Rogers solve the three-dimensional version of this problem, which has resisted attack for more than 30 years [40]. The connection between spanning trees and dimers was previously highlighted by Neville Temperley in 1974 [17]. The ideas from number theory needed to obtain the spanning tree constant of three-dimensional lattices, notably logarithmic Mahler measures, are further discussed in the article by Glasser 2 in this issue [41]. Wu has had a long and productive collaboration with Maillard, particularly on aspects of the Ising model. Maillard also wrote the definitive description of Wu's many scientific contributions at the time of Wu's 70th birthday [24]. The paper was later included among the biographies of great names such as Newton and Feynman in the History of Physics: Individual Biographies section in the MIT Net Advance of Physics website [59]. Further developments in the Ising model are highlighted in the article by Boukraa, Hassani and Maillard 3 in this issue [42]. Maillard's article also appears as the introduction to a wonderful collection of Wu's works that appeared in 2009 [25], entitled Exactly Solved Models: A Journey in Statistical Mechanics. The relation between bond percolation and the random-cluster formulation of the Potts model was pioneered by Kasteleyn and Fortuin in 1969 [26]. Later, in a 1977 paper, Wu showed how to rederive this relation in a different setting and used it to obtain various quantities of interest in the bond percolation problem, including critical exponents, from the exact solution of the Potts model [27]. A few months later, in collaboration with Kunz, he showed that site percolation can also be related to the Potts model [28]. Problems in bond percolation are treated in this issue by several works. The paper by Hu, Blöte 4 and Deng 5 investigates how the imposition of a 'canonical' constraint, that there be an equal number of open and closed edges, affects the universal properties [43]. The paper by Ziff 6 , Scullard, Wierman and Sedlock exactly solves inhomogeneous percolation on lattices of the bow-tie and checkerboard types [44]. In a 1979 paper on Potts model critical points, Wu proposed a conjecture, now known as the homogeneity hypothesis, on the location of the critical point of the kagome lattice [29]. Since then, numerous studies have been carried out to test the validity of that conjecture [12]. However, many of these tests proved to be inconclusive since they produced results extremely close to the conjectured value. The puzzle is finally solved by Jacobsen and Scullard in their two papers in this issue [39, 45]. Using a graphical analysis based on the Wu–Lin 5-vertex formulation, they recover the Wu conjecture of the kagome-lattice critical point as the first-order approximation in a well-defined graphical analysis. This establishes once and for all the approximate nature of the Wu conjecture. These investigations, and the exact solutions found by Wu, raised the question as to the conditions under which a lattice model is exactly solvable. Quite recently, such questions have been addressed through the technique of discrete holomorphicity (DH). This direction is represented in this issue by the contributions of Alam and Batchelor 7 , where the connection between DH and Yang–Baxter integrability is investigated [46]. DH is also a key ingredient in recent rigorous proofs that certain lattice models converge, in the continuum limit, to conformally invariant probabilistic processes known as Schramm–Loewner evolution (SLE). The theme of SLE appears within this issue in the article by Alberts, Kozdron and Lawler [47]. Finally, DH observables are used in this issue by Duminil-Copin to prove the divergence of the correlation length for the Potts model (in its formulation in terms of Fortuin–Kasteleyn clusters) when 1 ⩽ q ⩽ 4 [48]. Establishing the phase diagrams of lattice models is a recurrent theme in Wu's works. In an interesting but little-known work from 2000 with Guo and Blöte [30], he has shown that, contrary to common belief, the O( n ) model on the honeycomb lattice has a second-order phase transition for n > 2. The question of phase diagrams for O( n )-type models is taken up in this issue by Blöte, Wang and Guo 8 [49]. In 1983–84, Wu the National as the of the for His was to in condensed matter theory in the US. The in Washington offered Wu a of condensed matter physics research in US an that proved useful to his later his Wu has on the general of graphical analysis to a variety of lattices. This was highlighted in his paper on the Potts model and theory in which he derived a number of with and on for the and correlation earlier result in the same is the equivalence of the Potts model on a with a model on the found in 1976 in collaboration with Baxter and Kelland [15]. on these and on recent in the to and properties of percolation and Potts models on in their to this issue Wu has published on His work exact on and with a boundary In this and on the which is an of a Another is the paper by and of a with a in the Wu has also worked in He has based on statistical models and published a review of for which the connection of with statistical In Wu a formulation of which the of the exact of the between two in He later extended the formulation to a work which has since interest in in research. These works can be as a of Wu's Navy training in more than years In recent years Wu has this in work with , who with has related work on lattice in this issue A paper by and also appears Wu has made other contributions to for in relation to dimers in his recent where he also results from This is taken up by the article of in this issue In Wu in a paper, a formulation of duality of Potts correlation for n on the boundary of a lattice He the of n 2 and and that the formulation can be extended to higher of n a But the is by no and its solution was eventually found by Wu and his H Y They found that the correlation are not all when n 4 and They also the correlations in terms of the the interest in integrable systems the of statistical physics. and have appeared in in and in the study of certain between and known under the common of This last is represented in this issue by the of of Wu in and systems are in the article by , and and in the paper by and on This paper appears very since it is by the carried out in the of who the in Physics. Wu met his in They in in St. They have a Professor of at the University of San a and a teacher of and a in at and have Wu left behind when he left China in and with after a for the first time in and one are now and his who also has lives a comfortable in retirement in It has been a to this collection of papers on the occasion of and to him for much of the on which this introduction is are also to all the for such a and very of the of lattice models and and for the to the of this issue before the year to an Wu continues to be a highly and to a of him many more years of a and 1 Wu met Guttmann at the University of Australia, back in when Guttmann him to Over the years their have times at and and during Wu's to and to their close in the with Wu's in when they visited 2 Wu met Glasser in 1968 at MIT and also visited him later at They collaborated in on a paper later published in the in in which they an for the entropy of spanning trees on the triangular 3 Wu and Maillard research between the and the They also in Taiwan and at including one in on the Yang–Baxter in They have many including one of Wu's a paper on In that paper they the term a rigorous 4 Blöte and Wu first met in in Since then they have visited other as Blöte made regular to the University of and University, those of They first collaborated in a paper in which they obtained a for the critical of the honeycomb Ising model and the analysis. This of an a analysis the of Wu's later with Blöte and his 5 Deng obtained his PhD in under the direction of Blöte at Wu served on and in his 6 Wu's recent works on the Potts model he to Ziff They and and often had on points, including the use and of the term 7 Wu and Batchelor met at the National University in and in and their have at many and 8 Guo obtained his PhD under the of Blöte in Wu and Guo other well from Wu's to the University where he is an professor. He has collaborated with on the of analysis using the in several of his recent Wu first met at College, in Wu's 2006 of the of an N in the of a they forces in at a in and derived the expansion of that in and Wu and collaborated in a paper in 2000 on the exact solution of a 6-vertex model with bond Most they collaborated on the exact of dimers on a with a boundary Wu's with Jacobsen back to this when the out this in a to Wu's first paper on this They have since on various most at a at the Newton Institute in is another of They have met at numerous and In one in Wu's attention to a three-dimensional spin model on the lattice that appeared to be They soon solved the Ising model on that In they collaborated on a paper obtaining the phase diagram of a model.
Part 1 Satellite meeting of Statphys-19: quantum domains in ferromagnetic anisotropic Heisenberg chains, F.C. Alcaraz et al algebraic solution of the coincidence problem for crystals and quasi crystals, M. Baake reflection equations and surface critical phenomena, M.T. Batchelor quantum field theories in terms of group-valued local fields - an overview, L.L. Chau U(1)-invariant local and integrable lattice formulation of the massive Thirring model, C. Destri dilute algebras and solvable lattice models, U. Grimm quantum group and the Hofstadter problem, Y. Hatsugai et al domain walls in the spin-S quantum Ising chain, M. Henkel mutual exclusion statistics in the exactly solvable model of the Mott metal-insulator transition, M. Kohmoto et al boundary Yang-Baxter in the RSOS/SOS representation, W.M. Koo and C. Ahn probability of phase separation and two point temperature correlation functions for the Bose gas with delta interaction, V.E. Korepin and A.R. Its the generalized chiral clock model and its phase diagram, H. Au-Yang and J.H.H. Perk stochastic reaction-diffusion processes, operator algebras and integrable quantum spin chains, G.M. Schutz vertex-face correspondence in elliptic solutions of the Yang-Baxter equation, Y. Shibukawa logarithmic anomalies of susceptibility for solvable models, M. Takahashi on chiral Hubbard model at strong interaction, D.F. Wang soluble free-fermion models in d dimensions, F.Y. Wu bosonization based on Bethe Ansatz equations and proof of the conformal conjecture, Y.S. Wu and Y Yu. Part 3 The seventh Nankai workshop: one dimensional lattice models of electrons with r2 hopping and exchange, Ch. Gruber and D.F. Wang symmetry group invariants for spontaneous magnetization, J.-M. Maillard Zamolodchikov-Faddeev algebra vertex models, H.-P. Eckle scaling properties of the Ising model in a field, U. Grimm and B. Nienhuis experimental realizations of integrable reaction-diffusion processes in biological and chemical systems, G.M. Schutz and other papers. (Part contents).
conferred him PhD degree after successful defense of PhD thesis entitled "Statistical theory of partially excited systems", which Oleg elaborated under the guidance of Professor Ihor Yukhnovskii and Professor Roman Levitskii.Over the past few decades Oleg Derzhko has been scientifically working at the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine in Lviv, at first, as a research associate at the former Lviv Division of the Institute for Theoretical Physics of the Academy of Sciences of the UkrSSR (since 1982), and finally as head of Department for Theory of Model Spin Systems (2003-2016) and head of Department for Quantum Statistics (since 2016 up till now).During this period, he has also performed a long-term lecturing of several courses of theoretical physics at Ivan Franko National University in Lviv and Lviv Polytechnic National University.Oleg's scientific interests cover various modern problems of condensed matter physics and statistical physics.At the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics in Lviv OlegDerzhko has successfully developed a research direction, which is primarily focused on the state-of-theart problems of quantum spin models with a particular emphasis on the exactly solvable models and is already recognized worldwide.In addition to this challenging research topic in its own right, Oleg has a lot of other scientific interests including, but not limited to, unsolved problems of phase transitions of atomic liquids.It is impossible to summarize here all Oleg's achievements, so let us briefly review at least a few most important milestones of his scientific career.Early-career scientific contributions of Oleg Derzhko were devoted to equilibrium properties of partially excited gas and an influence of resonance irradiation upon a liquid-gas phase transition [1].He did not stop taking interest in this topic across his entire scientific career.The further research in this direction has been developing mainly in collaboration with Dr. Vasyl Myhal where their joint efforts are focused on the properties of a two-phase fluid of two-level atoms, the part of which is excited.Among other matters, Oleg and Vasyl brought a deeper understanding into the vapor-to-liquid transition, wetting under electromagnetic resonance irradiation, a microscopic theory of photonucleation with the special emphasis laid on nucleation phenomena in an electric field, surface tension, cavitation and so on [2][3][4].Exactly solvable problems in general and particularly one-dimensional quantum XY models and quantum Ising models in a transverse magnetic field have apparently become Oleg's greatest scientific passion and delight, where he substantially extended the rigorous results with the help of Jordan-Wigner fermionization technique [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].To this end, Oleg Derzhko and his collaborators, which were predominantly from the Institute for Condensed Matter Physics in Lviv, have nontrivially adapted the recipé originally envisaged in a seminal paper by Lieb, Schultz, and Mattis [20].A big step forward at that time was the formulation of the exact numerical method for the calculation of time-dependent spin correlation functions and the corresponding structure factors [5][6][7].Exact solutions for numerous random and periodic non-uniform versions of quantum XY and Ising models achieved by Oleg and by his research group brought a considerable progress in theoretical understanding of a lot of exciting phenomena emergent in one-dimensional quantum spin chains.For instance, in this field of study Oleg has significantly contributed to a clarification of the effect of regular nonuniformity, randomness and correlated disorder on static and dynamical properties of several exactly solved quantum XY and Ising chains [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].Oleg achieved another important breakthrough in this research area by a detailed examination of spin-Peierls instabilities of a certain class of quantum XY chains [15][16][17], as well as, quantum phase transitions and the dynamics of exactly solved XY chains with three-site interactions [16,18,19].
A rising star in the field of quantum many-body physics, Adilet Imambekov died on 18 July 2012 at age 30 while climbing Khan Tengri mountain in Kazakhstan. Despite his youth, Adilet made key contributions to the field of strongly correlated systems; in particular, he devised a new conceptual framework for describing universal dynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems. Adilet’s work was distinguished by a combination of deep physical insight, mathematical rigor, and elegance.Born on 2 September 1981, Adilet grew up in Zhambyl (now Taraz) and Almaty, Kazakhstan. His extraordinary abilities were evident by age 14, when he won national physics and mathematics competitions, then attended one of the former Soviet Union’s best science high schools, Kolmogorov Lyceum in Moscow. Adilet became the first student in 14 years to graduate with highest honors. As a physics Olympiads competitor, he took first-place prizes in the 1997 and 1998 National Russian Olympiads and received a gold medal at the 1998 International Physics Olympiad.Adilet continued his studies at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. In his junior year, he passed several Landau Theoretical Minimum exams. He then received his basic theoretical physics training as a member of the Laudau Institute’s theoretical group.After going to Harvard University in 2002 for his PhD studies, Adilet joined the group of one of us (Demler) and concentrated on many-body physics of cold atoms. His first work, which still serves as a guide for new experiments, predicted numerous exotic states for bosons with nonzero spin in an optical lattice.With his unique ability to fuse ideas from solid-state physics, atomic physics, and mathematics, Adilet was able to make progress in difficult problems when other attempts failed. His approach to the problem of interference between low-dimensional Bose condensates provides a good example. Adilet came up with a beautiful mapping of the problem at hand onto a seemingly unrelated one of statistical properties of random surfaces. His work became instrumental for the interpretation of subsequent experiments in which a new universal dynamical phenomenon, prethermalization, was demonstrated.Adilet uniquely combined mathematical intuition with deep insight into the physics of quantum phenomena. He went to Yale University to work with another of us (Glazman) as a postdoc in 2007 and became interested in the dynamics of 1D quantum fluids, conventionally described by the widely known Luttinger liquid theory. In simplifying the problem, the standard theory artificially imposes symmetry that distorts a fluid’s true dynamic response functions; Adilet’s contributions were essential to building a theory free of such artificial assumptions. He combined the existing perturbative results with his own analysis of an integrable Lieb–Liniger model and foresaw the emerging universal dynamic properties of a fluid.Less than a year later, Adilet built what he called the nonlinear Luttinger liquid theory, which universally describes low-energy excitations of a fluid made of particles with a generic, nonlinear dispersion relation. The theory’s beauty is in its simplicity and versatility. It answered the existing questions about the dynamic responses while also providing a platform for tackling other, more difficult issues. While Adilet was making big strides toward developing a theory of quantum quenches and a kinetic theory of nonlinear Luttinger liquid, he joined Rice University as a junior faculty member in 2009.Remarkably, Adilet’s demeanor did not change despite the challenges of being a tenure-track faculty member. He remained warm and open. He quickly forged collaborations with his Rice colleagues and ventured into, for him, a new area of solid-state optics.Adilet pursued his interests with utmost commitment. For example, when he began graduate school at Harvard, he became fascinated with climbing, mountaineering, and endurance sports. He started training nearly every day, which included running along the Charles River and rock climbing in New Hampshire when possible. Within a few years, he conquered two challenging mountains in Alaska and China and became rather well known among climbers. He also twice qualified for the Boston Marathon, and in May 2012 he won his only Ironman triathlon competition.Each of us cherished every opportunity to talk to or collaborate with Adilet. He had a wonderful sense of humor and often brightened even the most challenging and confusing physics topic with an unexpected joke.Adilet’s commitment and love of life inspired many of his friends to pursue their own dreams. He showed by example that little is impossible if you are dedicated. Before going on his last trip to Kazakhstan, Adilet was talking to one of us about how one should attempt to get the most valuable result in the most intellectually challenging problem rather than concentrating on getting every paper published: “There is simply too little time,” he said. Indeed, Adilet was given very little time. But it was enough for him to make long-lasting contributions to physics and to deeply affect the lives of those who were fortunate enough to know him. Adilet Imambekov DANIEL E. PROBER, YALE UNIVERSITYPPT|High resolution© 2013 American Institute of Physics.