Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Fizeau’s experiment and the Aharonov–Bohm effect

Richard J. Cook, H. Fearn, Peter W. Milonni

Published Aug 1, 1995• 44 citations
Publisher

Abstract

The electromagnetic wave equations in a moving medium may be approximated by a form similar to that of the Schrödinger equation for a particle in an electromagnetic field, with the velocity v of the medium and the vorticity ∇×v playing the roles of the vector potential and magnetic field, re- spectively. A purely classical optical analogue of the Aharonov–Bohm effect follows by consider- ation of the interference pattern produced by two beams, each of which propagates in a region with zero vorticity, but such that the flux of the vorticity through the closed loop defined by the optical paths does not vanish. Fizeau’s experiment (1851) on the velocity of light in moving media may be regarded as an example of such a situation.

DOI
10.1119/1.17840

Related papers

The Aharonov-Bohm effect revisited

H. Fearn

Schrodinger's equation for an electron in a vector potential A has a one-to-one correspondence with the wave equation for an electric field in a moving medium. First the author points out a few errors in the literature concerning the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect then she explores the optical analogy further. The author finds that curl A plays a similar role to curl v where v is the velocity of the moving medium.

Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Jun 1, 1995•4 citations

Aptly named Aharonov-Bohm effect has classical analogue, long history

Michael Berry

Writing about what is usually termed the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, Peter Sturrock and Timothy Groves argue (Physics Today, April 2010, page 8) that the same physics was discovered a decade earlier 1 1. W. Ehrenberg, R. E. Siday, Proc. Phys. Soc. B 62, 8 (1949). and should rightly be called the Ehrenberg-Siday effect. I agree that Werner Ehrenberg and Raymond Siday deserve recognition for their anticipation of AB. Indeed, in recent talks celebrating the 50th anniversary of AB, I began by describing the unfairly neglected paper by Ehrenberg and Siday. Nevertheless, I have come to a different conclusion from Sturrock and Groves: The expression “Aharonov-Bohm effect” is justified, for two reasons.First, although there is no doubt that the work by Ehrenberg and Siday anticipated how inaccessible magnetic flux can influence electron interference, that was as a curiosity, at the end of a paper whose main emphasis was the Hamiltonian analysis of electron optics. By contrast, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm emphasized from the start, as an essential and general aspect of quantum mechanics, the physical influence of inaccessible fields that act nonlocally through the vector potential.Second, Ehrenberg and Siday’s semi-classical approximation—essentially applying the Dirac magnetic phase factor to electrons traveling on either side of the flux—implies a wavefunction that is multivalued and therefore not the correct solution of Schrödinger’s equation. The lack of a single-valued wavefunction leaves their prediction open to doubt. By contrast, Aharonov and Bohm derived the exact single-valued solution for waves scattered by a flux line. Recently, it was shown that the Ehrenberg-Siday approximation corresponds to the first terms in a “many-whirls” representation that treats the exact AB wavefunction as a topological sum over paths circling the flux. 2 2. M. V. Berry, J. Phys. A (in press). Attribution of credit is a delicate matter. It tends to excite strong feelings, and I write about it reluctantly. But the Ehrenberg-Siday paper does seem to exemplify the unfortunate phenomenon identified by Alfred North White-head in a 1916 address to the British Association for the Advancement of Science: “Everything of importance has been said before, by someone who did not discover it.”In a companion letter in the April 2010 issue, Alexander Ershkovich correctly points out that the AB effect is present in classical Hamiltonian mechanics, even though remote magnetic fields cannot influence Newtonian trajectories. He advocates a “search for experiments that might prove … a classical analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.” Such an experiment exists already. In the classical physics of waves on a moving medium, the flow velocity acts like the vector potential in quantum mechanics, so the flow vorticity acts like the magnetic field; the analogy is precise. Fine details of the AB wavefunction were observed in ripples on the surface of water swirling irrotationally into a bathtub vortex, 3 3. M. V. Berry, R. G. Chambers, M. D. Large, C. Upstill, J. C. Walmsley, Eur. J. Phys. 1, 154 (1980). whose core is the analogue of inaccessible magnetic flux. REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. W. Ehrenberg, R. E. Siday, Proc. Phys. Soc. B 62, 8 (1949). Google ScholarCrossref2. M. V. Berry, J. Phys. A (in press). Google Scholar3. M. V. Berry, R. G. Chambers, M. D. Large, C. Upstill, J. C. Walmsley, Eur. J. Phys. 1, 154 (1980). Google ScholarCrossref© 2010 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Jul 30, 2010•12 citations

The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect

Ricardo Weder

The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.

arXiv:1006.1385•Journal of Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2011•16 citations

More variations on Aharonov-Bohm

A. I. Ershkovich

The article about Aharonov-Bohm effects is interesting and comprehensive. The primary and best-known effect shows that the vector potential A of the electromagnetic field is a physical reality rather than a mathematical artifice. That reality was implicit in the Schrödinger equation, as the Hamiltonian H depends on A instead of the electric field E and magnetic field B = ∇ × A. But the same statement also refers to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation in classical mechanics, so one may expect that a similar effect exists in classical physics as well.Indeed, classical mechanics is governed by the fundamental Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the action S: δS/δt + H = 0, which naturally follows from William Hamilton’s principle of least action. Both H and S depend on A (even with E = B = 0). Thus it is quite possible that the vector potential is also a physical reality in classical physics. Erwin Schrödinger arrived at his famous equation in 1926 by using a mechanics-optics analogy, the so-called eikonal equation. Hamilton in 1834 proved that eikonal and Hamilton-Jacobi equations are equivalent, so that the Schrödinger equation actually follows from Hamilton-Jacobi.Had Hamilton known that classical mechanics does not always hold, quantum mechanics might have appeared a century earlier. 1 1. H. Goldstein, C. Poole, J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1980), p.484 . The analogy between the equations of classical and quantum mechanics provides a reason to search for experiments that might prove whether a classical analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect exists.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. H. Goldstein, C. Poole, J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1980), p.484 . Google Scholar© 2010 American Institute of Physics.

Physics Today•Apr 1, 2010•2 citations

The Aharonov-Bohm Effect and Its Applications to Magnetic Field Observation

Akira Tonomura

This article describes the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect of electron waves travelling in free space and its application to the observation of gauge fields (vector potentials). The AB effect is inconceivable in classical physics since an observable effect is produced on electrons passing through field-free spaces. Electrons can be affected only by Lorentz forces due to electromagnetic fields. The situation is different in quantum mechanics, where electrons show wave properties: the concept of force is no longer relevant, so electric field E and magnetic field B, defined as forces acting on a unit charge, take on secondary meanings. “Phase shifts” come into play, and the primary physical entities become neither E nor B but electrostatic potential V and vector potential A. These potentials interact with electron waves and shift their phases.

Asia Pacific Physics Newsletter•Jan 1, 2013•2 citations

The Aharonov–Bohm Effect: Gauge Potentials, Quantum Phase, and Experimental Evidence

Giancarmine Sparso

This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.

•Jul 1, 2026•0 citations
The electromagnetic wave equations in a moving medium may be approximated by a form similar to that of the Schrödinger equation for a particle in an electromagnetic field, with the velocity v of the medium and the vorticity ∇×v playing the roles of the vector potential and magnetic field, re- spectively. A purely classical optical analogue of the Aharonov–Bohm effect follows by consider- ation of the interference pattern produced by two beams, each of which propagates in a region with zero vorticity, but such that the flux of the vorticity through the closed loop defined by the optical paths does not vanish. Fizeau’s experiment (1851) on the velocity of light in moving media may be regarded as an example of such a situation.
Writing about what is usually termed the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect, Peter Sturrock and Timothy Groves argue (Physics Today, April 2010, page 8) that the same physics was discovered a decade earlier 1 1. W. Ehrenberg, R. E. Siday, Proc. Phys. Soc. B 62, 8 (1949). and should rightly be called the Ehrenberg-Siday effect. I agree that Werner Ehrenberg and Raymond Siday deserve recognition for their anticipation of AB. Indeed, in recent talks celebrating the 50th anniversary of AB, I began by describing the unfairly neglected paper by Ehrenberg and Siday. Nevertheless, I have come to a different conclusion from Sturrock and Groves: The expression “Aharonov-Bohm effect” is justified, for two reasons.First, although there is no doubt that the work by Ehrenberg and Siday anticipated how inaccessible magnetic flux can influence electron interference, that was as a curiosity, at the end of a paper whose main emphasis was the Hamiltonian analysis of electron optics. By contrast, Yakir Aharonov and David Bohm emphasized from the start, as an essential and general aspect of quantum mechanics, the physical influence of inaccessible fields that act nonlocally through the vector potential.Second, Ehrenberg and Siday’s semi-classical approximation—essentially applying the Dirac magnetic phase factor to electrons traveling on either side of the flux—implies a wavefunction that is multivalued and therefore not the correct solution of Schrödinger’s equation. The lack of a single-valued wavefunction leaves their prediction open to doubt. By contrast, Aharonov and Bohm derived the exact single-valued solution for waves scattered by a flux line. Recently, it was shown that the Ehrenberg-Siday approximation corresponds to the first terms in a “many-whirls” representation that treats the exact AB wavefunction as a topological sum over paths circling the flux. 2 2. M. V. Berry, J. Phys. A (in press). Attribution of credit is a delicate matter. It tends to excite strong feelings, and I write about it reluctantly. But the Ehrenberg-Siday paper does seem to exemplify the unfortunate phenomenon identified by Alfred North White-head in a 1916 address to the British Association for the Advancement of Science: “Everything of importance has been said before, by someone who did not discover it.”In a companion letter in the April 2010 issue, Alexander Ershkovich correctly points out that the AB effect is present in classical Hamiltonian mechanics, even though remote magnetic fields cannot influence Newtonian trajectories. He advocates a “search for experiments that might prove … a classical analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.” Such an experiment exists already. In the classical physics of waves on a moving medium, the flow velocity acts like the vector potential in quantum mechanics, so the flow vorticity acts like the magnetic field; the analogy is precise. Fine details of the AB wavefunction were observed in ripples on the surface of water swirling irrotationally into a bathtub vortex, 3 3. M. V. Berry, R. G. Chambers, M. D. Large, C. Upstill, J. C. Walmsley, Eur. J. Phys. 1, 154 (1980). whose core is the analogue of inaccessible magnetic flux. REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. W. Ehrenberg, R. E. Siday, Proc. Phys. Soc. B 62, 8 (1949). Google ScholarCrossref2. M. V. Berry, J. Phys. A (in press). Google Scholar3. M. V. Berry, R. G. Chambers, M. D. Large, C. Upstill, J. C. Walmsley, Eur. J. Phys. 1, 154 (1980). Google ScholarCrossref© 2010 American Institute of Physics.
The seminal paper of Aharonov and Bohm [Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959)]10.1103/PhysRev.115.485 is at the origin of a very extensive literature in some of the more fundamental issues in physics. They claimed that electromagnetic fields can act at a distance on charged particles even if they are identically zero in the region of space where the particles propagate, that the fundamental electromagnetic quantities in quantum physics are not only the electromagnetic fields but also the circulations of the electromagnetic potentials; what gives them a real physical significance. They proposed two experiments to verify their theoretical conclusions. The magnetic Aharonov-Bohm effect, where an electron is influenced by a magnetic field that is zero in the region of space accessible to the electron, and the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect where an electron is affected by a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in the region where the electron is propagating, i.e., such that the electric field vanishes along its trajectory. The Aharonov-Bohm effects imply such a strong departure from the physical intuition coming from classical physics that it is no wonder that they remain a highly controversial issue after more than fifty years, in spite of the fact that they are discussed in most of the text books in quantum mechanics. The magnetic case has been studied extensively. The experimental issues were settled by the remarkable experiments of Tonomura et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1443 (1982); Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 792 (1986)] with toroidal magnets, that gave a strong evidence of the existence of the effect, and by the recent experiment of Caprez et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 210401 (2007)]10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.210401 that shows that the results of the Tonomura et al. experiments cannot be explained by the action of a force. The theoretical issues were settled by Ballesteros and Weder [Commun. Math. Phys. 285, 345 (2009)10.1007/s00220-008-0579-1; J. Math. Phys. 50, 122108 (2009)10.1063/1.3266176; Commun. Math. Phys. 303, 175 (2011)]10.1007/s00220-010-1166-9 who rigorously proved that quantum mechanics predicts the experimental results of Tonomura et al. and of Caprez et al. The electric Aharonov-Bohm effect has been much less studied. Actually, its existence, that has not been confirmed experimentally, is a very controversial issue. In their 1959 paper Aharonov and Bohm proposed an ansatz for the solution to the Schrödinger equation in regions where there is a time-dependent electric potential that is constant in space. It consists in multiplying the free evolution by a phase given by the integral in time of the potential. The validity of this ansatz predicts interference fringes between parts of a coherent electron beam that are subjected to different potentials. In this paper we prove that the exact solution to the Schrödinger equation is given by the Aharonov-Bohm ansatz up to an error bound in norm that is uniform in time and that decays as a constant divided by the velocity. Our results give, for the first time, a rigorous proof that quantum mechanics predicts the existence of the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, under conditions that we provide. We hope that our results will stimulate the experimental research on the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect.
The article about Aharonov-Bohm effects is interesting and comprehensive. The primary and best-known effect shows that the vector potential A of the electromagnetic field is a physical reality rather than a mathematical artifice. That reality was implicit in the Schrödinger equation, as the Hamiltonian H depends on A instead of the electric field E and magnetic field B = ∇ × A. But the same statement also refers to the Hamilton-Jacobi equation in classical mechanics, so one may expect that a similar effect exists in classical physics as well.Indeed, classical mechanics is governed by the fundamental Hamilton-Jacobi equation for the action S: δS/δt + H = 0, which naturally follows from William Hamilton’s principle of least action. Both H and S depend on A (even with E = B = 0). Thus it is quite possible that the vector potential is also a physical reality in classical physics. Erwin Schrödinger arrived at his famous equation in 1926 by using a mechanics-optics analogy, the so-called eikonal equation. Hamilton in 1834 proved that eikonal and Hamilton-Jacobi equations are equivalent, so that the Schrödinger equation actually follows from Hamilton-Jacobi.Had Hamilton known that classical mechanics does not always hold, quantum mechanics might have appeared a century earlier. 1 1. H. Goldstein, C. Poole, J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1980), p.484 . The analogy between the equations of classical and quantum mechanics provides a reason to search for experiments that might prove whether a classical analogue of the Aharonov-Bohm effect exists.REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<CITING ARTICLES1. H. Goldstein, C. Poole, J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1980), p.484 . Google Scholar© 2010 American Institute of Physics.
This article describes the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) effect of electron waves travelling in free space and its application to the observation of gauge fields (vector potentials). The AB effect is inconceivable in classical physics since an observable effect is produced on electrons passing through field-free spaces. Electrons can be affected only by Lorentz forces due to electromagnetic fields. The situation is different in quantum mechanics, where electrons show wave properties: the concept of force is no longer relevant, so electric field E and magnetic field B, defined as forces acting on a unit charge, take on secondary meanings. “Phase shifts” come into play, and the primary physical entities become neither E nor B but electrostatic potential V and vector potential A. These potentials interact with electron waves and shift their phases.
This technical note gives a self-contained exposition of the Aharonov–Bohm effect, aimed at advanced undergraduate students. Starting from the role of electromagnetic potentials in classical electrodynamics, it introduces gauge freedom, the quantum Hamiltonian with minimal coupling, and the gauge covariance of the Schrödinger equation. It then derives the Aharonov–Bohm phase for both the time-dependent scalar configuration and the magnetic configuration, showing how a charged particle acquires an observable phase shift while travelling only through regions where the electromagnetic field vanishes. The final part reviews the experimental evidence, from the early electron-interference experiments of Chambers and of Möllenstedt and Bayh to the 1986 toroidal-magnet experiment of Tonomura and collaborators. In that experiment, superconducting shielding confined the magnetic flux completely and closed the leakage-field loophole, while flux quantization produced the characteristic half-fringe shift. The note is expository and pedagogical: it does not present original research results and has not been peer reviewed. Originally developed from study notes prepared for the PHYS02 scientific talk at Lady Margaret Hall, Oxford, in July 2026; an earlier version of the notes has been publicly available on GitHub since August 2026. Corrections and comments are more than welcome at giancarminesparso@gmail.com.