Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Can Single Quantum Events Carry Superluminal Signals?

Nick Herbert

Published Dec 1, 1986• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb12465.x

Related papers

Can Bessel beams carry superluminal signals?

Thilo Sauter, Fritz Paschke

Physics Letters A•Jun 1, 2001•15 citations

Energy, Information, and Superluminal Speed in Quantum Electrodynamics

B. A. Veklenko

Without using the perturbation theory, the article demonstrates a possibility of superluminal information-carrying signals in standard quantum electrodynamics using the example of scattering of quantum electromagnetic field by an excited atom.

Light & Engineering•Aug 1, 2020•0 citations

Superluminal signals in quantum Optics

B. A. V Eklenko

Сборник тезисов конференции «Complex Systems of Charged Particles and their Interactions with Electromagnetic Radiation»•Jan 1, 2016•1 citation

Is Superluminal Signaling Possible in Collapse Theories of Quantum Mechanics?

Shan Gao

Foundations of Physics•Sep 23, 2023•0 citations

Superluminal Communication in Quantum Mechanics

Daniel J. Gauthier

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

Jamming Extensions of Quantum Correlations Lead to Hidden Superluminal Signaling

Ravishankar Ramanathan, Xie Sicheng, Michał Eckstein +1 more

Relativistic causality in certain spacetime configurations permits jamming - superluminal causal influences that nevertheless do not enable superluminal signaling. We fully characterize the correlations compatible with relativistic causality (RC) by extending the operator framework of PRL 104, 140404. When the underlying state is required to be quantum, we prove that any nontrivial jamming - whether state-independent or state-dependent - necessarily leads to hidden superluminal signaling. Thus, the only consistent possibilities are standard quantum correlations without jamming or the full relativistically causal correlation set, with intermediate jamming extensions of quantum correlations leading to signaling. As an application of our characterization, we investigate the security of device-independent (DI) cryptographic primitives against adversaries constrained only by relativistic causality. We construct explicit RC attacks that break DI bit commitment and DI secret sharing in jamming geometries, even when these protocols remain secure against no-signaling adversaries. Our results show that security against relativistic adversaries requires behaviors to be specified together with the spacetime locations of their measurement events; input-output statistics alone are insufficient.

quant-pharXiv:2608.20247•Aug 21, 2026•0 citations
Relativistic causality in certain spacetime configurations permits jamming - superluminal causal influences that nevertheless do not enable superluminal signaling. We fully characterize the correlations compatible with relativistic causality (RC) by extending the operator framework of PRL 104, 140404. When the underlying state is required to be quantum, we prove that any nontrivial jamming - whether state-independent or state-dependent - necessarily leads to hidden superluminal signaling. Thus, the only consistent possibilities are standard quantum correlations without jamming or the full relativistically causal correlation set, with intermediate jamming extensions of quantum correlations leading to signaling. As an application of our characterization, we investigate the security of device-independent (DI) cryptographic primitives against adversaries constrained only by relativistic causality. We construct explicit RC attacks that break DI bit commitment and DI secret sharing in jamming geometries, even when these protocols remain secure against no-signaling adversaries. Our results show that security against relativistic adversaries requires behaviors to be specified together with the spacetime locations of their measurement events; input-output statistics alone are insufficient.