Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Annals of Physics

Canonical Transformations for Time Evolution and Their Representation in Wigner Distribution Phase Space

M. Moshińsky, Anju Sharma

Published May 1, 2000• 6 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1006/aphy.2000.6038

Related papers

WIGNER PHASE-SPACE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS

World Scientific lecture notes in physics•Mar 1, 1991•0 citations

Wigner Distribution Functions and the Representation of Canonical Transformations in Time-Dependent Quantum Mechanics

Dieter Schuch

For classical canonical transformations, one can, using the Wigner transformation, pass from their representation in Hilbert space to a kernel in phase space.In this paper it will be discussed how the time-dependence of the uncertainties of the corresponding time-dependent quantum problems can be incorporated into this formalism.

arXiv:0807.1966•Symmetry Integrability and Geometry Methods and Applications•Jul 14, 2008•5 citations

Linear canonical transformations of coherent and squeezed states in the Wigner phase space

D. Han, Y. S. Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1988•3 citations

Wigner distribution functions and the representation of a non-bijective canonical transformation in quantum mechanics

Rainer Dirl, Peter Kasperkovitz, M. Moshińsky

In a previous paper, with a similar title, the authors showed that for bijective (i.e. one-to-one onto) canonical transformations they can obtain their quantum mechanical representations in the form of a kernel in the phase space of Wigner distribution functions and recover the classical expectation for this kernel in the limit to 0. For non-bijective canonical transformations the situation is more complex as the phase space acquires either a Riemann surface structure or requires the introduction of the concept of an ambiguity group. By discussing the non-bijective canonical transformation taking them from an oscillator of frequency kappa -1 , where kappa is an integer, to one of unit frequency, they see how the kernel is generalised to include the indices associated with the irreducible representations of the ambiguity group, i.e. the ambiguity spins. They obtain the kernel explicitly and show that in the limit to 0 they recover the form that they expect in the Riemann surface picture of their phase space. While they illustrate their analysis through the representation in Wigner distribution phase space of a specific non-bijective canonical transformation, the procedure is clearly extendable to the representations of general canonical transformations of this type.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 21, 1988•15 citations

The Wigner Distribution Function and Second Quantization in Phase Space

Wesley E. Brittin, Willard R. Chappell

Reviews of Modern Physics•Oct 1, 1962•81 citations

Wigner distribution functions and the representation of canonical transformations in quantum mechanics

Gastón García‐Calderón, M. Moshińsky

Shows how for classical canonical transformations the authors can pass, with the help of Wigner distribution functions, from their representation U in the configurational Hilbert space to a kernel K in phase space. The latter is a much more transparent way of looking at representations of canonical transformations, as the classical limit is reached when h(cross) to 0 and the successive quantum corrections are related with the power of h(cross) 2n , n=1,2, et seq.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jun 1, 1980•49 citations
In a previous paper, with a similar title, the authors showed that for bijective (i.e. one-to-one onto) canonical transformations they can obtain their quantum mechanical representations in the form of a kernel in the phase space of Wigner distribution functions and recover the classical expectation for this kernel in the limit to 0. For non-bijective canonical transformations the situation is more complex as the phase space acquires either a Riemann surface structure or requires the introduction of the concept of an ambiguity group. By discussing the non-bijective canonical transformation taking them from an oscillator of frequency kappa -1 , where kappa is an integer, to one of unit frequency, they see how the kernel is generalised to include the indices associated with the irreducible representations of the ambiguity group, i.e. the ambiguity spins. They obtain the kernel explicitly and show that in the limit to 0 they recover the form that they expect in the Riemann surface picture of their phase space. While they illustrate their analysis through the representation in Wigner distribution phase space of a specific non-bijective canonical transformation, the procedure is clearly extendable to the representations of general canonical transformations of this type.