Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The Journal of Chemical Physics

Fourth Picture in Quantum Mechanics

R. A. Marcus

Published Aug 15, 1970• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A quantum-mechanical counterpart to the classical mechanical variation of constants method is derived, with initial values of coordinates and momenta as “constants.” Use is made of a formal operator solution for nonautonomous or autonomous systems in classical mechanics, which we published earlier, and of the correspondence between Poisson brackets and commutators. An alternative unified Lie-algebraic derivation is also given. It is shown that the Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures in quantum mechanics do not correspond directly to the method of classical mechanical variation of these “constants.” A fourth picture, termed “mixed interaction,” is introduced and shown to so correspond. It complements the previous three in a symmetrical manner, bearing the same relation to the Heisenberg picture that the Schrödinger picture bears to the interaction one. The group-theoretic relationship to the interaction picture is noted, as is the relation to the usual variation-of-constants method in wave mechanics. For completeness, the classical counterparts of the Heisenberg and interaction pictures are also given. The present results arose from a comparison of quantum and classical treatments of collisions.

DOI
10.1063/1.1674179

Related papers

Forms of quantum mechanics

Sibel Başkal, Young S Kim, Marilyn E. Noz

Quantum mechanics takes various forms. For atomic and nuclear physics, the Schrödinger picture is convenient. For quantum field theory and for correspondence with classical mechanics through Poisson brackets, the Heisenberg picture is useful. The interaction picture is useful in calculations. The Wigner phase-space is convenient for studying the uncertainty relations and their symmetries. The density matrix and probability distribution are necessary for extracting measurable dynamic quantities and are essential for ensemble averages. Mathematical instruments, such as the Lie algebra of the rotation group, the creation and annihilation operators of the Fock space and the Lie algebra governing Dirac’s two oscillators are shown to be derivable from Heisenberg’s commutation relations.

Institute of Physics eBooks•Jun 1, 2019•0 citations

Equation of Motion

Ahmad Amer

This chapter explores the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence and physical consistency. The two formulations are shown to be connected by a unitary transformation. The Heisenberg equation of motion is derived, and the time evolution of operators—particularly those not explicitly dependent on time—is expressed in terms of their initial values. It is demonstrated that scalar products, expectation values, matrix elements, and commutation relations remain invariant under the change of picture. Drawing a close analogy with classical mechanics, Dirac's insight is presented: the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical Poisson bracket is the operator commutator divided by iℏ . The chapter concludes by deriving the Lorentz force law within the quantum framework using commutator algebra. Metadata/Keywords: Schrödinger picture, Heisenberg picture, unitary transformation, Heisenberg equation of motion, Poisson bracket, Lorentz force, time evolution, expectation values

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 5, 2025•0 citations

Euler & Lagrange versus Heisenberg & Schroedinger: Dynamical Pictures in Classical and Quantum Mechanics

M. Hossein Partovi

Using quantum-classical analogies, we find that dynamical pictures of quantum mechanics have precise counterparts in classical mechanics. In particular, the Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions of fluid dynamics in classical mechanics are the analogs of the Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, respectively. Similarities between classical and quantum dynamical pictures are explored within the framework of the Koopman-von Neumann formalism. These allow for a natural definition of various dynamical pictures in classical mechanics as well as the application of classical concepts to quantum dynamics. As an illustration, we use the interaction picture to find the classical evolution of an ensemble of particles of equal initial momenta and arbitrary configuration density under the action of a constant force in one dimension. As a second example, we discuss the extension of the ideas of sensitivity to initial conditions and chaos in classical mechanics to quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1305.5272•May 22, 2013•0 citations

Time evolution of quantum systems

Dževad Belkić

In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.

CRC Press eBooks•Jan 15, 2020•0 citations

Algebra of quantum mechanics via classical phonons. II: Klein-Gordon dynamics, the Heisenberg formalism, the Dirac canonical commutation rule and the Poincare algebra through the continuous Poisson bracket formalism

Emmanuel Giner

In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.

quant-pharXiv:2607.03909•Jul 7, 2026•0 citations

The quantum mechanics of non-holonomic systems

Richard J. Eden

Abstract Interactions of a non-holonomic type are fundamentally different from interactions which can be treated as part of the Hamiltonian of a system. They usually lead to constraints which do not commute with the Hamiltonian, and cause important alterations in the development of a state vector. This paper deals with the Heisenberg equations of motion by analogy with classical dynamics using the Poisson bracket formalism of a previous paper (Eden 1951). The Schrödinger equation is investigated in co-ordinate representation, and it is shown that the wave function will have a non-integrabie phase factor or quasi phase. The quasi phase leads to an indefiniteness in the wave function, but does not violate the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics nor lead to any ambiguity in the physical interpretation of the theory. The relation between the Schrödinger and the Heisenberg equations shows that the Schrödinger treatment is also consistent with the classical analogue. If there is a given initial probability that the non-holonomic system has co-ordinates q(0)r, then there will be the same probability that the wave function in the subsequent motion will be zero except in a certain region of co-ordinate space. This region is the part of co-ordinate space which is accessible in the classical theory from the point q(0)r.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Mar 7, 1951•30 citations
A quantum-mechanical counterpart to the classical mechanical variation of constants method is derived, with initial values of coordinates and momenta as “constants.” Use is made of a formal operator solution for nonautonomous or autonomous systems in classical mechanics, which we published earlier, and of the correspondence between Poisson brackets and commutators. An alternative unified Lie-algebraic derivation is also given. It is shown that the Schrödinger, Heisenberg, and interaction pictures in quantum mechanics do not correspond directly to the method of classical mechanical variation of these “constants.” A fourth picture, termed “mixed interaction,” is introduced and shown to so correspond. It complements the previous three in a symmetrical manner, bearing the same relation to the Heisenberg picture that the Schrödinger picture bears to the interaction one. The group-theoretic relationship to the interaction picture is noted, as is the relation to the usual variation-of-constants method in wave mechanics. For completeness, the classical counterparts of the Heisenberg and interaction pictures are also given. The present results arose from a comparison of quantum and classical treatments of collisions.
Quantum mechanics takes various forms. For atomic and nuclear physics, the Schrödinger picture is convenient. For quantum field theory and for correspondence with classical mechanics through Poisson brackets, the Heisenberg picture is useful. The interaction picture is useful in calculations. The Wigner phase-space is convenient for studying the uncertainty relations and their symmetries. The density matrix and probability distribution are necessary for extracting measurable dynamic quantities and are essential for ensemble averages. Mathematical instruments, such as the Lie algebra of the rotation group, the creation and annihilation operators of the Fock space and the Lie algebra governing Dirac’s two oscillators are shown to be derivable from Heisenberg’s commutation relations.
This chapter explores the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, emphasizing their mathematical equivalence and physical consistency. The two formulations are shown to be connected by a unitary transformation. The Heisenberg equation of motion is derived, and the time evolution of operators—particularly those not explicitly dependent on time—is expressed in terms of their initial values. It is demonstrated that scalar products, expectation values, matrix elements, and commutation relations remain invariant under the change of picture. Drawing a close analogy with classical mechanics, Dirac's insight is presented: the quantum mechanical counterpart of the classical Poisson bracket is the operator commutator divided by iℏ . The chapter concludes by deriving the Lorentz force law within the quantum framework using commutator algebra. Metadata/Keywords: Schrödinger picture, Heisenberg picture, unitary transformation, Heisenberg equation of motion, Poisson bracket, Lorentz force, time evolution, expectation values
Using quantum-classical analogies, we find that dynamical pictures of quantum mechanics have precise counterparts in classical mechanics. In particular, the Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions of fluid dynamics in classical mechanics are the analogs of the Schroedinger and Heisenberg pictures in quantum mechanics, respectively. Similarities between classical and quantum dynamical pictures are explored within the framework of the Koopman-von Neumann formalism. These allow for a natural definition of various dynamical pictures in classical mechanics as well as the application of classical concepts to quantum dynamics. As an illustration, we use the interaction picture to find the classical evolution of an ensemble of particles of equal initial momenta and arbitrary configuration density under the action of a constant force in one dimension. As a second example, we discuss the extension of the ideas of sensitivity to initial conditions and chaos in classical mechanics to quantum mechanics.
In non-relativistic quantum mechanics, there exist several different ways of describing the time dependence of dynamics of physical systems. Of particular importance for quantum scattering theory are the Schrodinger, Heisenberg and Dirac pictures. For establishing a connection between quantum mechanical formalisms and classical mechanics, as well as for investigating relativistic solutions, the Heisenberg picture appears to be the most convenient. This picture of quantum mechanics is particularly adapted for the examination of free fields. The customary wave-mechanical version of quantum theory is obtained if we choose, e.g., in the framework of the Schrodinger picture to work with the coordinate representation. Possible results of measurements on a quantum system are called eigenvalues. To each of the latter values corresponds one or more eigenstates. An eigenstate is degenerate when more than one eigenstate correspond to a single eigenvalue.
In the first part of this series we have shown how the Schrodinger equation for a single particle and the corresponding non relativistic quantum observables can be obtained from a purely classical phonon model through the Newtonian equations of motion. In this work we focus instead on how the classical Hamiltonian formalism applied to the same phonon system allows to recover the feature of relativistic quantum mechanics for a single spinless particle. Using the classical nature of the phonon model, we naturally define continuous Poisson brackets between classical observables, which allows to recover the dynamics of such observables, i.e. the Ehrenfest relations associated to real-valued Klein-Gordon fields. The Poisson brackets also permits to obtain the generic form of constants of motions, thus generalizing the concept of inner products and momentum on Klein-Gordon fields. We then connect the formalism of real-valued classical functionals with that of hermitian operators and complex-valued wave functions. This is done through the introduction of a non-local complex-valued change of variables which allows to rewrite the real-valued Klein-Gordon equation in a form akin to the Schrodinger equation, and the classical observables as quantum expectation values. Then, we show how this change of variables allows to rewrite the classical Poisson brackets as commutators of hermitian operators. This points out the strict equivalence between the Heisenberg formalism and the formalism of classical Poisson bracket. Eventually, we illustrate how the Poisson brackets allows to recover the transformations of Poincare group in 1+1 dimension together with its algebra. The latter makes the link between the Lorentz invariant inner product of Mostafazadeh and the Casimir invariant associated to the mass of particle.
Abstract Interactions of a non-holonomic type are fundamentally different from interactions which can be treated as part of the Hamiltonian of a system. They usually lead to constraints which do not commute with the Hamiltonian, and cause important alterations in the development of a state vector. This paper deals with the Heisenberg equations of motion by analogy with classical dynamics using the Poisson bracket formalism of a previous paper (Eden 1951). The Schrödinger equation is investigated in co-ordinate representation, and it is shown that the wave function will have a non-integrabie phase factor or quasi phase. The quasi phase leads to an indefiniteness in the wave function, but does not violate the fundamental laws of quantum mechanics nor lead to any ambiguity in the physical interpretation of the theory. The relation between the Schrödinger and the Heisenberg equations shows that the Schrödinger treatment is also consistent with the classical analogue. If there is a given initial probability that the non-holonomic system has co-ordinates q(0)r, then there will be the same probability that the wave function in the subsequent motion will be zero except in a certain region of co-ordinate space. This region is the part of co-ordinate space which is accessible in the classical theory from the point q(0)r.