Physical Review A

Reply to “Comment on ‘Feshbach resonances in an optical lattice’ ”

D. B. M. Dickerscheid, D. van Oosten, Henk T. C. Stoof

Published Jan 4, 2006• 7 citations

Abstract

We show that the Comment by Diener and Ho [Phys. Rev. A 73, 017601 (2006)] is based on the misunderstanding that the Hamiltonian used by Dickerscheid et al. to describe Feshbach resonances in an optical lattice is a microscopic Hamiltonian as opposed to an effective Hamiltonian.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.73.017602

Related papers

Comment on “Feshbach resonances in an optical lattice”

Roberto B. Diener, Tin-Lun Ho

We point out some logical inconsistencies in the model proposed in [Phys. Rev. A 71, 043604 (2005)] as well as in the calculations performed on it. The proposed model is not able to describe Feshbach resonances in optical lattices.

arXiv:cond-mat/0507255Physical Review AJan 4, 200610 citations

Reply to "Comment on `Feshbach resonances in an optical lattice' " (2 pages)

D. B. M. Dickerscheid

Physical Review AJan 1, 20060 citations

Comment on ‘‘Generalized saddle-point method for Feshbach resonances’’

Kwong T. Chung

In the recent article by M. Bylicki [Phys. Rev. A 39, 3316 (1989)], many remarks were made concerning the saddle-point technique developed by this author. These remarks appear to have been based on a misunderstanding of both the spirit as well as the actual application of this method. In this Comment, I shall try to clarify some of these misunderstandings, and one hopes, put the problem in its proper perspective.

Physical Review AApr 1, 199019 citations

Comment on “Spectral Signatures of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov Order Parameter in One-Dimensional Optical Lattices”

Rafael A. Molina, J. Dukelsky, Peter Schmitteckert

Comment on ‘‘Spectral Signatures of the Fulde-FerrellLarkin-Ovchinnikov Order Parameter in OneDimensional Optical Lattices’’ A Comment on the Letter by M. Reza Bakhtiari, M.J. Leskinen, and P. Törmä, Phys. Rev. Lett.PRLTAO0031-9007 101, 120404 (2008)10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.120404. The authors of the Letter offer a Reply. © 2009 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review LettersApr 24, 20095 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Generalized saddle-point method for Feshbach resonances’ ’’

Mirosłlaw Bylicki

It is argued that the saddle-point method developed by Chung [Phys. Rev. A 20, 1743 (1979)] may be considered in the category of orthogonalization to the open-channel space, and that the generalization of the method introduced by Bylicki offers a precise prescription for implementation of the original formulation by Chung.

Physical Review AApr 1, 199010 citations

Bakhtiari, Leskinen, and Törmä Reply:

M. Reza Bakhtiari, M. J. Leskinen, Päivi Törmä

This is a Reply to: Comment on "Spectral Signatures of the Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov Order Parameter in One-Dimensional Optical Lattices" R. A. Molina J. Dukelksy, and P. Schmitteckert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 168901 (2009)

arXiv:0904.4345Physical Review LettersApr 24, 20091 citation