The formally exact expression of the exchange-correlation potential in the local-scaling density functional theory (LSDFT) was derived recently by the author, and it is equivalent to that of Holas and March. The basic equation of the LS-DFT was also derived, and it is equivalent to the differential virial theorem (DVT). The LS-DFT has been extended to the local-scaling current density functional theory (LS-CDFT). This has been compared with the formulation of Holas and March. In this note, the LS-CDFT is extended to the timedependent system; i.e., the local-scaling time-dependent current density functional theory (LS-TDCDFT) is formulated. As a straightforward extension of ref. 3, the density and the paramagnetic current density jp are adopted as the basic variables, which is the same procedure used by Colwell et al. It is explicitly shown that the time-dependent exchange-correlation scalar potential vxc and the vector one Axc are same functionals of firstand second-order density matrices as those of the time-independent case, while the total effective potentials are not so. The equation of motion of jp provides the DVT for the time-dependent system in the magnetic field. The time-dependent term of the DVT is equal to that of the nonmagnetic time-dependent system. Throughout the entire formulation, the notation of the tensor product is suppressed. Here, an N-electron system in an external scalar potential vextðr; tÞ, an external vector potential Aextðr; tÞ, and an interaction potential uðr; r0Þ 1⁄4 =jr r0j is considered, where is the coupling constant treated as a variable parameter. In a time-independent theory, the quantity to be minimized is the energy. But in the time-dependent case, the action S plays the role:
Time-dependent quantal density-functional theory (Q-DFT) is a description of the s-system of noninteracting fermions with electronic density equivalent to that of Schr\"odinger theory, in terms of fields whose sources are quantum-mechanical expectations of Hermitian operators. The theory delineates and defines the contribution of each type of electron correlation to the local electron-interaction potential ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\mathrm{ee}}(\mathbf{r},t)$ of the s system. These correlations are due to the Pauli exclusion principle, Coulomb repulsion, correlation-kinetic, and correlation-current-density effects, the latter two resulting, respectively, from the difference in kinetic energy and current density between the interacting Schr\"odinger and noninteracting systems. We employ Q-DFT to prove the following sum rules and properties of the s system: (i) the components of the potential due to these correlations separately exert no net force on the system; (ii) the torque of the potential is finite and due solely to correlation-current-density effects; (iii) two sum rules involving the curl of the dynamic electron-interaction kernel defined as the functional derivative of ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\mathrm{ee}}(\mathbf{r},t)$ are derived and shown to depend on the frequency dependent correlation-current-density effect. Furthermore, via adiabatic coupling constant (\ensuremath{\lambda}) perturbation theory, we prove: (iv) the exchange potential ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{x}(\mathbf{r},t)$ is the work done in a conservative field representative of Pauli correlations and lowest-order $O(\ensuremath{\lambda})$ correlation-kinetic and correlation-current-density effects; (v) the correlation potential ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{c}(\mathbf{r},t)$ commences in $O({\ensuremath{\lambda}}^{2}),$ and, at each order, it is the work done in a conservative field representative of Coulomb correlations and correlation-kinetic and correlation-current-density effects; (vi) we derive the integral virial theorem relating ${\ensuremath{\nu}}_{\mathrm{ee}}(\mathbf{r},t)$ to the electron-interaction and correlation-kinetic energy for arbitrary coupling constant strength \ensuremath{\lambda}, and show there are no explicit correlation-current-density contributions to the energy. From this integral virial theorem we (vii) obtain the fully interacting $(\ensuremath{\lambda}=1)$ and exchange-only $(\ensuremath{\lambda}=0)$ integral virial theorems as special cases, the latter showing there is no explicit correlation-kinetic contribution to the exchange energy; and (viii) write expressions for the electron-interaction and correlation-kinetic actions for arbitrary coupling constant \ensuremath{\lambda} in terms of the corresponding fields.
For the system of noninteracting fermions in a one-body potential , the local virial theorems (LVT) are relations, at a given point in space, between this potential, kinetic energy and particle densities. It was recently shown (Brack et al 2010 J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 43 255204) that for d-dimensional linear and also for isotropic harmonic oscillator potentials these LVTs are exactly satisfied. We present alternative and simple proofs of these theorems, by consideration of the canonical or Bloch density matrix and its relation to the kinetic energy density. The explicit analytical forms of the Bloch density matrix are used for the above-mentioned potentials to achieve the proofs. For the case of linear potential, we obtain a more general result for the so-called semilocal virial theorem, and for the harmonic oscillator potential case we derive a new relationship between the diagonal part of the canonical bloch density and the kinetic energy density.
We investigate the particle and kinetic-energy densities for a system of N fermions confined in a potential V (r). In an earlier paper (Brack and Murthy 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 1111), some exact and asymptotic relations involving the particle density and the kinetic-energy density locally, i.e. at any given point r, were derived for isotropic harmonic oscillators in arbitrary dimensions. In this paper, we show that these local virial theorems (LVTs) also hold exactly for linear potentials in arbitrary dimensions and for the one-dimensional box. We also investigate the validity of these LVTs when they are applied to arbitrary smooth potentials. We formulate generalized LVTs that are suggested by a semiclassical theory which relates the density oscillations to the closed non-periodic orbits of the classical system. We test the validity of these generalized theorems numerically for various local potentials. Although formally they are only valid asymptotically for large particle numbers N, we show that practically they are surprisingly accurate also for moderate values of N.
The general expectation that, in principle, the time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) is an exact formulation of the time evolution of an interacting N-electron system is critically reexamined. It is demonstrated that the previous TDDFT foundation, resting on four theorems by Runge and Gross (RG) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997 (1984)], is invalid because undefined phase factors corrupt the RG action integral functionals. Our finding confirms much of a previous analysis by van Leeuwen [Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 15, 1969 (2001)]. To analyze the RG theorems and other aspects of TDDFT, an utmost simplification of the Kohn-Sham (KS) concept has been introduced, in which the ground-state density is obtained from a single KS equation for one spatial (spinless) orbital. The time-dependent (TD) form of this radical Kohn-Sham (rKS) scheme, which has the same validity status as the ordinary KS version, has proved to be a valuable tool for analysis. The rKS concept is used to clarify also the alternative nonvariational formulation of TD KS theory. We argue that it is just a formal theory, allowing one to reproduce but not predict the time development of the exact density of the interacting N-electron system. Besides the issue of the formal exactness of TDDFT, it is shown that both the static and time-dependent KS linear response equations neglect the particle-particle (p-p) and hole-hole (h-h) matrix elements of the perturbing operator. For a local (multiplicative) operator this does not lead to a loss of information due to a remarkable general property of local operators. Accordingly, no logical inconsistency arises with respect to DFT, because DFT requires any external potential to be local. For a general nonlocal operator the error resulting from the neglected matrix elements is of second order in the electronic repulsion.