Quantum mechanics, randomness, and deterministic reality

Niall Shanks

Mahendra Samarawickrama

Abstract The randomness in quantum mechanics is due to missing consciousness. By introducing consciousness, the complex dynamics in reality become causal, deterministic and unpredictable but not random. The reality behaves in a way the awareness is preserved, which causes the integrity of the experience. This behaviour complies with the Principle of Least Action. We introduce the consciousness particle aka primion to the Standard Model of particle physics to explore the implication of consciousness on reality. As per the Conscious Model of particle physics, quantum entanglement shares parameters in consciousness, adhering to non-local reality. An observation collapses of entangled wave function violates the integrity in consciousness and transforms the non-local reality to local. By incorporating consciousness, it is possible to understand reality as causal and deterministic, yet unpredictable but not random. The Conscious Model of particle physics unifies causation, relativity, and quantum mechanics and establishes a grand theory of understanding reality. Further, this research established that consciousness is an independent fundamental dimension that preserves integrity in awareness of non-local reality. This new dimension facilitates quantum entanglement to establish non-local awareness beyond the experience of five sensors or materialism. The wisdom of non-local awareness is beyond the imagination, the experience of five sensors, computation or analysis. It exists at the non-local consciousness dimension rather than our experiences, perceptions and knowledge in local space-time dimensions. Similar to our five sensors (touch, sight, hearing, smell and taste), which are developed to observe and measure local reality in space-time, the Mind emerges to be aware of both local and non-local realities through consciousness.

Michele Caponigro, Stefano Mancini

We shall draw an affirmative answer to the question posed in the title.The key point will be a quantum description of physical reality.Once fixed at ontic level two basic elements, namely the laws of physics and the matter, we argue that the underlying physical reality emerges from the interconnection between these two elements.We consider any physical process, including measurement, modeled by unitary evolution.In this context, we will deduce quantum randomness as a consequence of inclusion of the observer into the quantum system.The global picture of the universe is in a sense deterministic, but from our own local perspective (as part of the system) we perceive quantum mechanical randomness.Then, the notion of "information" turns out to be a derivative concept.I've spent much more time thinking about the photon problem [i.e., about quantum theory] than about relativity. A. Einstein

Grete Hermann

Mosh� Flato

Mike Hamilton

· Building upon the foundational framework of a discrete six dimensional spacetime manifold, this paper isolates and formalizes the concept of Spacetime Randomness as a definitional clarification of deterministic wave collapse. · I propose that true randomness cannot be verified by analyzing statistical distributions within a single spatial or temporal frame. · A genuinely random system must exhibit strict independence across disparate coordinates in both space and time. · This paper addresses the apparent contradiction between a deterministic temporal standing wave and the probabilistic nature of quantum collapse by analyzing the topography of temporal wave interference. · I reframe the terminology, demonstrating that both predictable and unpredictable events are governed by the same deterministic 6D wave mechanics. · Predictability arises from asymmetrically weighted events, while true randomness is the deterministic output of a symmetrically weighted temporal distribution. · I formalize the mathematics of spacetime independence, demonstrating that quantum randomness is a geometric reality of uniform phase interference. · Furthermore, I resolve the apparent conflict with Bell theorem by redefining entanglement as a shared temporal dimension, and I propose a unique application of the Leggett Garg inequality, predicting a mass dependent temporal correlation variance that standard four dimensional quantum mechanics strictly forbids.