Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Foundations of Physics

Nonlocality and the Kochen-Specker paradox

Peter Heywood, Michael L. G. Redhead

Published May 1, 1983• 194 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00729511

Related papers

A SIMPLE NEW PROOF OF THE KOCHEN-SPECKER PARADOX

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations

A PROBABILISTIC INEQUALITY FOR THE KOCHEN-SPECKER PARADOX

Jan-Åke Larsson

Foundations of probability and physics•Dec 1, 2001•0 citations

Relations between Bell nonlocality and Kochen-Specker contextuality

Lucas Emanuel Antunes Porto

•Feb 18, 2025•0 citations

The Kochen-Specker Paradox and Great-Circle Descents

Jan-Åke Larsson, Luigi Accardi, Guillaume Adenier +5 more

The Kochen‐Specker paradox has recently been subject to experimental interest, and in this situation the number of steps in the proof in question is important. The fewer number of steps there are in the proof, the more imperfections can be tolerated in the experimental setup. In the spin‐1 version of the Kochen‐Specker paradox, when the settings used are directions in three‐dimensional space, the proofs can be easily visualized and the steps can easily be counted. In particular, the original Kochen‐Specker paradox makes use of so‐called great‐circle descents. Here, we will examine such descents in detail and also some other versions of the proof for spin‐1 systems. We will see that, perhaps contrary to intuition, the proofs that use a small number of steps do not in general use only great‐circle descents, and examine the reasons for this and possible extensions. At least one new proof will also be presented for the spin‐1 case.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Current Research on Nonlocality

Nicolas Gisin

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Schrödinger’s Paradox and Nonlocality

Douglas L. Hemmick, Asif M. Shakur

SpringerBriefs in physics•Sep 30, 2011•0 citations
The Kochen‐Specker paradox has recently been subject to experimental interest, and in this situation the number of steps in the proof in question is important. The fewer number of steps there are in the proof, the more imperfections can be tolerated in the experimental setup. In the spin‐1 version of the Kochen‐Specker paradox, when the settings used are directions in three‐dimensional space, the proofs can be easily visualized and the steps can easily be counted. In particular, the original Kochen‐Specker paradox makes use of so‐called great‐circle descents. Here, we will examine such descents in detail and also some other versions of the proof for spin‐1 systems. We will see that, perhaps contrary to intuition, the proofs that use a small number of steps do not in general use only great‐circle descents, and examine the reasons for this and possible extensions. At least one new proof will also be presented for the spin‐1 case.