Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review Letters

Comment on “Pulsed Energy-Time Entangled Twin-Photon Source for Quantum Communication”

Thomas Durt

Published Feb 12, 2001• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by J. Brendel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2594 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 March 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1392©2001 American Physical Society

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.86.1392

Related papers

Comment on “Quantum Clock Synchronization Based on Shared Prior Entanglement”

Eric A. Burt, Christopher R. Ekstrom, Thomas B. Swanson

A Comment on the Letter by Richard Jozsȧ, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2010 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 6 September 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.129801©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Aug 29, 2001•21 citations

Comment on “Orbital and Intrinsic Angular Momentum of Single Photons and Entangled Pairs of Photons Generated by Parametric Down-Conversion”

E. R. Eliel, S. M. Dutra, Gerard Nienhuis +1 more

A Comment on the Letter by H. H. Arnaut and G. A. Barbosa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 286 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 11 September 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5208©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•May 28, 2001•23 citations

Comment on “Two-Photon Franson-Type Experiment and Local Realism”

Luiz Carlos Ryff

A Comment on the Letter by Sven Aerts et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2872 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 20 March 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1908©2001 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Feb 26, 2001•4 citations

Nonlocality of a Single Photon?

Daniel M. Greenberger, Michael Horne, Anton Zeilinger

A Comment on the Letter by Lucien Hardy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2279 (1994). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 6 December 1994DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.2064©1995 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Sep 4, 1995•226 citations

Comment on “Transitions in the Communication Capacity of Dissipative Qubit Channels”

Michael Nathanson, Mary Beth Ruskai

A Comment on the Letter by D. Daems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180503 (2009). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 2 June 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.188902© 2010 The American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Oct 29, 2010•1 citation

Comment on “Entanglement on Demand through Time Reordering”

Pradyumna K. Pathak, Stephen Hughes

A Comment on the Letter by J. E. Avron et al., [Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 120501 (2008)]. The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 18 February 2009DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.048901©2009 American Physical Society

Physical Review Letters•Jul 22, 2009•9 citations
A Comment on the Letter by J. Brendel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2594 (1999). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.Received 27 March 2000DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1392©2001 American Physical Society