Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

American Journal of Physics

Comment on “On Quantum Mechanical Operators in Generalized Coordinates”

F. Landis Markley

Published May 1, 1973• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1119/1.1987363

Related papers

On Quantum Mechanical Operators in Generalized Coordinates

Gary R. Gruber

American Journal of Physics•Oct 1, 1972•5 citations

Comments on transition from classical to quantum mechanics in generalized coordinates via the covariant derivative

Gary R. Gruber

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations

Reality of linear and angular momentum expectation values in bound states

Utpal Roy, Suranjana Ghosh, T. Shreecharan +1 more

In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinate comes. We have tried to point out most of the elementary quantum mechanical results, related to the momentum operator, which has coordinate dependence. We explicitly calculate the momentum expectation values in various bound states and show that the expectation value really turns out to be zero, a consequence of the fact that the momentum expectation value is real. We comment briefly on the status of the angular variables in quantum mechanics and the problems related in interpreting them as dynamical variables. At the end, we calculate the Heisenberg's equation of motion for the radial component of the momentum for the Hydrogen atom.

arXiv:0704.0373•Apr 3, 2007•3 citations

Momentum and Hamiltonian operators in generalized coordinates

Makoto Kato

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 1994•0 citations

On Glauber's representation for general quantum-mechanical operators

R. Bonifacio, Lorenzo M. Narducci, E. Montaldi

Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields•Feb 1, 1967•12 citations

Comments on minimal interactions in quantum mechanics

Stanley A. Bruce, A. Delgado, Luis Roa

We study minimal interactions in quantum systems characterized by position and momentum operators defined as the direct product of a traceless finite matrix and an ordinary canonical coordinate.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 21, 1996•5 citations
In quantum mechanics textbooks the momentum operator is defined in the Cartesian coordinates and rarely the form of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinates is discussed. Consequently one always generalizes the Cartesian prescription to other coordinates and falls in a trap. In this work we introduce the difficulties one faces when the question of the momentum operator in spherical polar coordinate comes. We have tried to point out most of the elementary quantum mechanical results, related to the momentum operator, which has coordinate dependence. We explicitly calculate the momentum expectation values in various bound states and show that the expectation value really turns out to be zero, a consequence of the fact that the momentum expectation value is real. We comment briefly on the status of the angular variables in quantum mechanics and the problems related in interpreting them as dynamical variables. At the end, we calculate the Heisenberg's equation of motion for the radial component of the momentum for the Hydrogen atom.