Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chinese Physics B

Dynamical time versus system time in quantum mechanics

D. Arsenović, Nikola Burić, Dragomir M Davidović, Slobodan Prvanović

Published Jul 1, 2012• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Properties of an operator representing the dynamical time in the extended parameterization invariant formulation of quantum mechanics are studied. It is shown that this time operator is given by a positive operator measure analogously to the quantities that are known to represent various measurable time operators. The relation between the dynamical time of the extended formulation and the best known example of the system time operator, i.e., for the free one-dimensional particle, is obtained.

DOI
10.1088/1674-1056/21/7/070302

Related papers

Space of events and the time observable

Nikola Buri ' c, Slobodan Prvanovi ' c

Quantum mechanical time operator is introduced following the parametric formulation of classical mechanics in the extended phase space. Quantum constraint on the extended quantum system is defined in analogy to the constraint of the classical extended system, and is interpreted as the condition defining the space of physical events. It is seen that the peculiar properties of the time observable, otherwise obtained in the models of time measurement, are of the classical origin, (i.e.), due to the quantized classical constraint of the parametric Hamiltonian dynamics.

arXiv:1102.2754•Feb 14, 2011•0 citations

Time-of-arrival in quantum mechanics

Grot, N, Carlo Rovelli C, Tate, R S

We study the problem of computing the probability for the time-of-arrival of a quantum particle at a given spatial position. We consider a solution to this problem based on the spectral decomposition of the particle's (Heisenberg) state into the eigenstates of a suitable operator, which we denote as the ``time-of-arrival'' operator. We discuss the general properties of this operator. We construct the operator explicitly in the simple case of a free nonrelativistic particle, and compare the probabilities it yields with the ones estimated indirectly in terms of the flux of the Schr\\"odinger current. We derive a well defined uncertainty relation between time-of-arrival and energy; this result shows that the well known arguments against the existence of such a relation can be circumvented. Finally, we define a ``time-representation'' of the quantum mechanics of a free particle, in which the time-of-arrival is diagonal. Our results suggest that, contrary to what is commonly assumed, quantum mechanics exhibits a hidden equivalence between independent (time) and dependent (position) variables, analogous to the one revealed by the parametrized formalism in classical mechanics.

•Mar 14, 1996•108 citations

Time of arrival in quantum mechanics

Norbert Grot, Carlo Rovelli C, Ranjeet S. Tate

We study the problem of computing the probability for the time of arrival of a quantum particle at a given spatial position. We consider a solution to this problem based on the spectral decomposition of the particle's (Heisenberg) state into the eigenstates of a suitable operator, which we denote as the ``time-of-arrival'' operator. We discuss the general properties of this operator. We construct the operator explicitly in the simple case of a free nonrelativistic particle and compare the probabilities it yields with the ones estimated indirectly in terms of the flux of the Schr\"odinger current. We derive a well-defined uncertainty relation between time of arrival and energy; this result shows that the well-known arguments against the existence of such a relation can be circumvented. Finally, we define a ``time representation'' of the quantum mechanics of a free particle, in which the time of arrival is diagonal. Our results suggest that, contrary to what is commonly assumed, quantum mechanics exhibits a hidden equivalence between independent (time) and dependent (position) variables, analogous to the one revealed by the parametrized formalism in classical mechanics. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

arXiv:quant-ph/9603021•Physical Review A•Dec 1, 1996•176 citations

Constrained event space and properties of the physical time observable

D. Arsenović, Nikola Burić, Dragomir M Davidović +1 more

It is demonstrated that the important common property of operators representing various observable times in quantum mechanics, namely the fact that such an operator is always given by a nonorthogonal resolution of unity, can be obtained from a constraint on the possible physical events, i.e. on the extended space of the Hamiltonian formulation of the parametric dynamics. Operators which could generate meaningful probability distributions for various time measurements are suggested. Copyright (C) EPLA, 2012

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Jan 1, 2012•6 citations

Quantum time and spatial localization in relativistic quantum mechanics

Von Zuben, Francis Stephen Geisler

Two related problems in relativistic quantum mechanics, the apparent superluminal propagation of initially localized particles, and the dependence of their localization on the motion of the observer, are analyzed in the context of the theory of constraints. Time and energy operators are introduced for the free relativistic particle, and a parametrization invariant formulation is obtained through Dirac constraint theory. The resulting description is of a system constrained in momentum and energy, but not in position or time, for which observables are constants of the motion. The Klein-Gordon equation is recovered on a physical Hilbert space, constructed via integration over the proper time from an augmented Hilbert space, wherein time and energy are dynamical variables...

•Nov 1, 1999•1 citation

A dynamical time operator in relativistic quantum mechanics

M. Bauer

A self-adjoint dynamical time operator is introduced in Dirac’s relativistic formulation of quantum mechanics and shown to satisfy with the Hamiltonian a commutation relation analogous to that of the position and momentum operators. The instantaneous rate of change of the position expectation value with respect to the simultaneous expectation value of the dynamical time operator is shown to be the phase velocity, in agreement with de Broglie’s hypothesis of a particle associated wave whose phase velocity is larger than c. Thus, these two elements of the original basis and interpretation of quantum mechanics are integrated into its formal mathematical structure. Pauli’s objection is shown to be resolved or circumvented. Possible relevance to current developments in interference in time and in cosmology is noted.

•Aug 19, 2009•1 citation
Properties of an operator representing the dynamical time in the extended parameterization invariant formulation of quantum mechanics are studied. It is shown that this time operator is given by a positive operator measure analogously to the quantities that are known to represent various measurable time operators. The relation between the dynamical time of the extended formulation and the best known example of the system time operator, i.e., for the free one-dimensional particle, is obtained.
Quantum mechanical time operator is introduced following the parametric formulation of classical mechanics in the extended phase space. Quantum constraint on the extended quantum system is defined in analogy to the constraint of the classical extended system, and is interpreted as the condition defining the space of physical events. It is seen that the peculiar properties of the time observable, otherwise obtained in the models of time measurement, are of the classical origin, (i.e.), due to the quantized classical constraint of the parametric Hamiltonian dynamics.
We study the problem of computing the probability for the time-of-arrival of a quantum particle at a given spatial position. We consider a solution to this problem based on the spectral decomposition of the particle's (Heisenberg) state into the eigenstates of a suitable operator, which we denote as the ``time-of-arrival'' operator. We discuss the general properties of this operator. We construct the operator explicitly in the simple case of a free nonrelativistic particle, and compare the probabilities it yields with the ones estimated indirectly in terms of the flux of the Schr\\"odinger current. We derive a well defined uncertainty relation between time-of-arrival and energy; this result shows that the well known arguments against the existence of such a relation can be circumvented. Finally, we define a ``time-representation'' of the quantum mechanics of a free particle, in which the time-of-arrival is diagonal. Our results suggest that, contrary to what is commonly assumed, quantum mechanics exhibits a hidden equivalence between independent (time) and dependent (position) variables, analogous to the one revealed by the parametrized formalism in classical mechanics.
We study the problem of computing the probability for the time of arrival of a quantum particle at a given spatial position. We consider a solution to this problem based on the spectral decomposition of the particle's (Heisenberg) state into the eigenstates of a suitable operator, which we denote as the ``time-of-arrival'' operator. We discuss the general properties of this operator. We construct the operator explicitly in the simple case of a free nonrelativistic particle and compare the probabilities it yields with the ones estimated indirectly in terms of the flux of the Schr\"odinger current. We derive a well-defined uncertainty relation between time of arrival and energy; this result shows that the well-known arguments against the existence of such a relation can be circumvented. Finally, we define a ``time representation'' of the quantum mechanics of a free particle, in which the time of arrival is diagonal. Our results suggest that, contrary to what is commonly assumed, quantum mechanics exhibits a hidden equivalence between independent (time) and dependent (position) variables, analogous to the one revealed by the parametrized formalism in classical mechanics. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
It is demonstrated that the important common property of operators representing various observable times in quantum mechanics, namely the fact that such an operator is always given by a nonorthogonal resolution of unity, can be obtained from a constraint on the possible physical events, i.e. on the extended space of the Hamiltonian formulation of the parametric dynamics. Operators which could generate meaningful probability distributions for various time measurements are suggested. Copyright (C) EPLA, 2012
Two related problems in relativistic quantum mechanics, the apparent superluminal propagation of initially localized particles, and the dependence of their localization on the motion of the observer, are analyzed in the context of the theory of constraints. Time and energy operators are introduced for the free relativistic particle, and a parametrization invariant formulation is obtained through Dirac constraint theory. The resulting description is of a system constrained in momentum and energy, but not in position or time, for which observables are constants of the motion. The Klein-Gordon equation is recovered on a physical Hilbert space, constructed via integration over the proper time from an augmented Hilbert space, wherein time and energy are dynamical variables...
A self-adjoint dynamical time operator is introduced in Dirac’s relativistic formulation of quantum mechanics and shown to satisfy with the Hamiltonian a commutation relation analogous to that of the position and momentum operators. The instantaneous rate of change of the position expectation value with respect to the simultaneous expectation value of the dynamical time operator is shown to be the phase velocity, in agreement with de Broglie’s hypothesis of a particle associated wave whose phase velocity is larger than c. Thus, these two elements of the original basis and interpretation of quantum mechanics are integrated into its formal mathematical structure. Pauli’s objection is shown to be resolved or circumvented. Possible relevance to current developments in interference in time and in cosmology is noted.