Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Archive for History of Exact Sciences

Pascual Jordan's influence on the discovery of Heisenberg's indeterminacy principle

Mara Beller

Published Jan 1, 1985• 35 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf00348588

Related papers

Pascual Jordan’s legacy and the ongoing research in quantum field theory⋆

B. Schroer

arXiv:1010.4431•The European Physical Journal H•Apr 1, 2011•6 citations

9 Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle (aka Indeterminacy)

H. Chris Ransford

•Mar 20, 2015•0 citations

Psychology and Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy.

Ivan D. London

Psychological Review•May 1, 1945•14 citations

Quantum Mechanics in Context: Pascual Jordan's 1936 Anschauliche Quantentheorie

Don A. Howard

•Sep 10, 2013•5 citations

Pascual Jordan, his contributions to quantum mechanics and his legacy in contemporary local quantum physics

Bert Schroer

After recalling episodes from Pascual Jordan's biography including his pivotal role in the shaping of quantum field theory and his much criticized conduct during the NS regime, I draw attention to his presentation of the first phase of development of quantum field theory in a talk presented at the 1929 Kharkov conference. He starts by giving a comprehensive account of the beginnings of quantum theory, emphasising that particle-like properties arise as a consequence of treating wave-motions quantum-mechanically. He then goes on to his recent discovery of quantization of ``wave fields'' and problems of gauge invariance. The most surprising aspect of Jordan's presentation is however his strong belief that his field quantization is a transitory not yet optimal formulation of the principles underlying causal, local quantum physics. The expectation of a future more radical change coming from the main architect of field quantization already shortly after his discovery is certainly quite startling. I try to answer the question to what extent Jordan's 1929 expectations have been vindicated. The larger part of the present essay consists in arguing that Jordan's plea for a formulation without ``classical correspondence crutches'', i.e. for an intrinsic approach (which avoids classical fields altogether), is successfully addressed in past and recent publications on local quantum physics.

arXiv:hep-th/0303241•Mar 27, 2003•33 citations

Heisenberg's Indetermination Principle and the Quantum

G. E. M. Jauncey

Nature•Jul 13, 1929•0 citations
After recalling episodes from Pascual Jordan's biography including his pivotal role in the shaping of quantum field theory and his much criticized conduct during the NS regime, I draw attention to his presentation of the first phase of development of quantum field theory in a talk presented at the 1929 Kharkov conference. He starts by giving a comprehensive account of the beginnings of quantum theory, emphasising that particle-like properties arise as a consequence of treating wave-motions quantum-mechanically. He then goes on to his recent discovery of quantization of ``wave fields'' and problems of gauge invariance. The most surprising aspect of Jordan's presentation is however his strong belief that his field quantization is a transitory not yet optimal formulation of the principles underlying causal, local quantum physics. The expectation of a future more radical change coming from the main architect of field quantization already shortly after his discovery is certainly quite startling. I try to answer the question to what extent Jordan's 1929 expectations have been vindicated. The larger part of the present essay consists in arguing that Jordan's plea for a formulation without ``classical correspondence crutches'', i.e. for an intrinsic approach (which avoids classical fields altogether), is successfully addressed in past and recent publications on local quantum physics.