Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

An extended phase-space stochastic quantization of constrained Hamiltonian systems

Gagik Ter-Kazarian, Y. Sobouti

Published Jul 4, 2008• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Having gained some insight into the concept of 'actual and virtual paths' in a phase-space formalism (Sobouti and Nasiri 1993 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7 3255, Nasiri et al 2006 J. Math. Phys. 47 092106), in the present paper we address the question of 'extended' phase-space stochastic quantization of Hamiltonian systems with first class holonomic constraints. We present the appropriate Langevin equations, which quantize such constrained systems, and prove the equivalence of the stochastic quantization method with the conventional path-integral gauge measure of Faddeev–Popov quantization.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/41/31/315303

Related papers

Path-integral quantization of constrained Hamiltonian dynamical system: A pedagogical example

Manan Sengupta

The concept of constrained Hamiltonian dynamical systems and their quantization, introduced by Dirac, constitutes one of the most fundamental contributions to the development of the canonical formalism in recent times. Dirac’s concepts were later incorporated into the path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics by Faddeev, which played an important role in understanding some subtle aspects in the quantization of non-Abelian gauge theory. An example is given from nonrelativistic quantum mechanics which illustrates the formalism through simple analogy.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 1986•1 citation

An Introduction to Coordinate-free Quantization and its Application to Constrained Systems

John R. Klauder, Sergei V. Shabanov

Canonical quantization entails using Cartesian coordinates, and Cartesian coordinates exist only in flat spaces. This situation can either be questioned or accepted. In this paper we offer a brief and introductory overview of how a flat phase space metric can be incorporated into a covariant, coordinate-free quantization procedure involving a continuous-time (Wiener measure) regularization of traditional phase space path integrals. Additionally we show how such procedures can be extended to incorporate systems with constraints and illustrate that extension for special systems.

arXiv:quant-ph/9804049•Apr 21, 1998•3 citations

An Introduction to Coordinate Free Quantization and its Application to Constrained Systems 1

John R. Klauder, Sergei V. Shabanov

Canonical quantization entails using Cartesian coordinates, and Cartesian coordinates exist only in flat spaces. This situation can either be questioned or accepted. In this paper we offer a brief and introductory overview of how a flat phase space metric can be incorporated into a covariant, coordinate-free quantization procedure involving a continuous-time (Wiener measure) regularization of traditional phase space path integrals. Additionally we show how such procedures can be extended to incorporate systems with constraints and illustrate that extension for special systems.

CRC Press eBooks•Nov 27, 2020•9 citations

Hamilton-Jacobi quantization of the finite dimensional systems with constraints

Dumitru Bǎleanu, Yurdahan Güler

The Hamiltonian treatment of constrained systems in $G\ddot{u}ler's$ formalism leads us to the total differential equations in many variables. These equations are integrable if the corresponding system of partial differential equations is a Jacobi system. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the quantization of the finite dimensional systems with constraints using the canonical formalism introduced by $G\ddot{u}ler$. This approach is applied for two systems with constraints and the results are in agreement with those obtained by Dirac's canonical quatization method and path integral quantization method.

arXiv:hep-th/9901083•Il Nuovo Cimento B•Jan 19, 1999•0 citations

Path Integral Quantization and Riemannian-Symplectic Manifolds

Sergei V. Shabanov, John R. Klauder

We develop a mathematically well-defined path integral formalism for general symplectic manifolds. We argue that in order to make a path integral quantization covariant under general coordinate transformations on the phase space and involve a genuine functional measure that is both finite and countably additive, the phase space manifold should be equipped with a Riemannian structure (metric). A suitable method to calculate the metric is also proposed. 1. Most quantization formulations lead to correct results only when the system in question is expressed in one of a family of special (Cartesian) coordinate systems [1]. However, for Hamiltonian systems on a generic symplectic manifold, the canonical variables do not admit such special coordinates. Moreover classical Hamiltonian dynamics exhibits covariance under general coordinate transformations on the symplectic manifold, and, in this sense, is coordinate-free. This covariance is lost upon a formal phase-space path integral quantization. The reason is that the Hamiltonian action involves terms linear in the time derivatives and, therefore, its exponential (even in Euclidean time) does not induce a

•Jan 1, 1998•6 citations

Dirac versus reduced phase space quantization

Mikhail S. Plyushchay, A. V. Razumov

The relationship between the Dirac and reduced phase space quantizations is investigated for spin models belonging to the class of Hamiltonian systems having no gauge conditions. It is traced out that the two quantization methods may give similar, or essentially different physical results, and, moreover, it is shown that there is a class of constrained systems, which can be quantized only by the Dirac method. A possible interpretation of the gauge degrees of freedom is given. Introduction There are two main methods to quantize the Hamiltonian systems with first class constraints: the Dirac quantization [1] and the reduced phase space quantization [2], whereas two other methods, the path integral method [3, 2] and the BRST quantization [4] being the most popular method for the covariant quantization of gauge-invariant systems, are based on and proceed from them [2, 5]. The basic idea of the Dirac method consists in imposing quantum mechanically the first class constraints as operator conditions on the states for singling out the physical ones [1]. The reduced phase space quantization first identifies the physical degrees of freedom at the classical level by the factorization of the constraint surface with respect to the action of the gauge group, generated by the constraints. Then the resulting Hamiltonian system is quantized as a usual unconstrained system [2]. Naturally, the problem of the relationship of these two methods arises. It was discussed in different contexts in literature [6], and there is an opinion that the differences between the two quantization methods can be traced out to a choice of factor ordering in the construction of various physical operators.

arXiv:hep-th/9412137•Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 5, 1995•11 citations
Having gained some insight into the concept of 'actual and virtual paths' in a phase-space formalism (Sobouti and Nasiri 1993 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 7 3255, Nasiri et al 2006 J. Math. Phys. 47 092106), in the present paper we address the question of 'extended' phase-space stochastic quantization of Hamiltonian systems with first class holonomic constraints. We present the appropriate Langevin equations, which quantize such constrained systems, and prove the equivalence of the stochastic quantization method with the conventional path-integral gauge measure of Faddeev–Popov quantization.
The concept of constrained Hamiltonian dynamical systems and their quantization, introduced by Dirac, constitutes one of the most fundamental contributions to the development of the canonical formalism in recent times. Dirac’s concepts were later incorporated into the path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics by Faddeev, which played an important role in understanding some subtle aspects in the quantization of non-Abelian gauge theory. An example is given from nonrelativistic quantum mechanics which illustrates the formalism through simple analogy.
Canonical quantization entails using Cartesian coordinates, and Cartesian coordinates exist only in flat spaces. This situation can either be questioned or accepted. In this paper we offer a brief and introductory overview of how a flat phase space metric can be incorporated into a covariant, coordinate-free quantization procedure involving a continuous-time (Wiener measure) regularization of traditional phase space path integrals. Additionally we show how such procedures can be extended to incorporate systems with constraints and illustrate that extension for special systems.
Canonical quantization entails using Cartesian coordinates, and Cartesian coordinates exist only in flat spaces. This situation can either be questioned or accepted. In this paper we offer a brief and introductory overview of how a flat phase space metric can be incorporated into a covariant, coordinate-free quantization procedure involving a continuous-time (Wiener measure) regularization of traditional phase space path integrals. Additionally we show how such procedures can be extended to incorporate systems with constraints and illustrate that extension for special systems.
The Hamiltonian treatment of constrained systems in Gu¨ler′sG\ddot{u}ler'sGu¨ler′s formalism leads us to the total differential equations in many variables. These equations are integrable if the corresponding system of partial differential equations is a Jacobi system. The main aim of this paper is to investigate the quantization of the finite dimensional systems with constraints using the canonical formalism introduced by Gu¨lerG\ddot{u}lerGu¨ler. This approach is applied for two systems with constraints and the results are in agreement with those obtained by Dirac's canonical quatization method and path integral quantization method.
We develop a mathematically well-defined path integral formalism for general symplectic manifolds. We argue that in order to make a path integral quantization covariant under general coordinate transformations on the phase space and involve a genuine functional measure that is both finite and countably additive, the phase space manifold should be equipped with a Riemannian structure (metric). A suitable method to calculate the metric is also proposed. 1. Most quantization formulations lead to correct results only when the system in question is expressed in one of a family of special (Cartesian) coordinate systems [1]. However, for Hamiltonian systems on a generic symplectic manifold, the canonical variables do not admit such special coordinates. Moreover classical Hamiltonian dynamics exhibits covariance under general coordinate transformations on the symplectic manifold, and, in this sense, is coordinate-free. This covariance is lost upon a formal phase-space path integral quantization. The reason is that the Hamiltonian action involves terms linear in the time derivatives and, therefore, its exponential (even in Euclidean time) does not induce a
The relationship between the Dirac and reduced phase space quantizations is investigated for spin models belonging to the class of Hamiltonian systems having no gauge conditions. It is traced out that the two quantization methods may give similar, or essentially different physical results, and, moreover, it is shown that there is a class of constrained systems, which can be quantized only by the Dirac method. A possible interpretation of the gauge degrees of freedom is given. Introduction There are two main methods to quantize the Hamiltonian systems with first class constraints: the Dirac quantization [1] and the reduced phase space quantization [2], whereas two other methods, the path integral method [3, 2] and the BRST quantization [4] being the most popular method for the covariant quantization of gauge-invariant systems, are based on and proceed from them [2, 5]. The basic idea of the Dirac method consists in imposing quantum mechanically the first class constraints as operator conditions on the states for singling out the physical ones [1]. The reduced phase space quantization first identifies the physical degrees of freedom at the classical level by the factorization of the constraint surface with respect to the action of the gauge group, generated by the constraints. Then the resulting Hamiltonian system is quantized as a usual unconstrained system [2]. Naturally, the problem of the relationship of these two methods arises. It was discussed in different contexts in literature [6], and there is an opinion that the differences between the two quantization methods can be traced out to a choice of factor ordering in the construction of various physical operators.