Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Quantum Information

ON THE ADIABATIC EVOLUTION OF ONE-DIMENSIONAL PROJECTOR HAMILTONIANS

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu

Published Jun 1, 2012• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the adiabatic evolution of one-dimensional projector Hamiltonians. Three kinds of adiabatic algorithms for this problem are shown, in which two of them provide a quadratic speedup over the other one. But when the ground state of the initial Hamiltonian and that of the final Hamiltonian have a zero overlap, the algorithms above all fail, in the sense of infinite time complexity. A corresponding revised method for this phenomenon through adding a driving Hamiltonian is also shown, from which a constant time complexity can be gained. But by a simple analysis, we find that the original time complexity for the adiabatic evolution is shifted to implement the driving Hamiltonian, which is supported by several early works in the literature.

DOI
10.1142/s0219749912500463

Related papers

On Models of Nonlinear Evolution Paths in Adiabatic Quantum Algorithms

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu, Samuel L. Braunstein

In this paper, we study two different nonlinear interpolating paths in adiabatic evolution algorithms for solving a particular class of quantum search problems where both the initial and final Hamiltonian are one-dimensional projector Hamiltonians on the corresponding ground state. If the overlap between the initial state and final state of the quantum system is not equal to zero, both of these models can provide a constant time speedup over the usual adiabatic algorithms by increasing some another corresponding "complexity". But when the initial state has a zero overlap with the solution state in the problem, the second model leads to an infinite time complexity of the algorithm for whatever interpolating functions being applied while the first one can still provide a constant running time. However, inspired by a related reference, a variant of the first model can be constructed which also fails for the problem when the overlap is exactly equal to zero if we want to make up the "intrinsic" fault of the second model — an increase in energy. Two concrete theorems are given to serve as explanations why neither of these two models can improve the usual adiabatic evolution algorithms for the phenomenon above. These just tell us what should be noted when using certain nonlinear evolution paths in adiabatic quantum algorithms for some special kind of problems.

arXiv:1301.1115•Communications in Theoretical Physics•Jan 1, 2013•8 citations

On Models of Nonlinear Evolution Paths in Adiabatic Quantum Algorithms4

孙杰, 路松峰

In this paper,we study two different nonlinear interpolating paths in adiabatic evolution algorithms for solving a particular class of quantum search problems where both the initial and final Hamiltonian are one-dimensional projector Hamiltonians on the corresponding ground state.If the overlap between the initial state and final state of the quantum system is not equal to zero,both of these models can provide a constant time speedup over the usual adiabatic algorithms by increasing some another corresponding complexity.But when the initial state has a zero overlap with the solution state in the problem,the second model leads to an infinite time complexity of the algorithm for whatever interpolating functions being applied while the first one can still provide a constant running time.However,inspired by a related reference,a variant of the first model can be constructed which also fails for the problem when the overlap is exactly equal to zero if we want to make up the intrinsic fault of the second model - an increase in energy.Two concrete theorems are given to serve as explanations why neither of these two models can improve the usual adiabatic evolution algorithms for the phenomenon above.These just tell us what should be noted when using certain nonlinear evolution paths in adiabatic quantum algorithms for some special kind of problems.

理论物理通讯：英文版•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations

Adiabatic quantum computation with a one-dimensional projector Hamiltonian

Avatar Tulsi

Adiabatic quantum computation is based on the adiabatic evolution of quantum systems. We analyze a particular class of quantum adiabatic evolutions where either the initial or final Hamiltonian is a one-dimensional projector Hamiltonian on the corresponding ground state. The minimum-energy gap, which governs the time required for a successful evolution, is shown to be proportional to the overlap of the ground states of the initial and final Hamiltonians. We show that such evolutions exhibit a rapid crossover as the ground state changes abruptly near the transition point where the energy gap is minimum. Furthermore, a faster evolution can be obtained by performing a partial adiabatic evolution within a narrow interval around the transition point. These results generalize and quantify earlier works.

arXiv:0806.0385•Physical Review A•Nov 23, 2009•27 citations

Can adiabatic algorithms with extra items always be efficient in quantum computation?

Zhigang Zhang, Songfeng Lu, Xin Cong Zhou

It has been known that when an assisted driving item is added to the Hamiltonian of the main system, the efficiency of the resultant adiabatic evolution can be significantly improved. In some special cases, it can be seen that, only by adding an assisted driving Hamiltonian can the resultant adiaba tic evolution work. So it seems that, the additional driving Hamiltonian plays an important role in adiabatic computing. In this paper, we show five kinds of possible forms of the driving Hamiltonian, and analyses the performance of the algorithms. We find that the former fourth kinds of driving Hamiltonian may still cause the adiabatic algorithm lose their efficiency when the overlap of the initial and final states equals some special value. More importantly, we find that only the final kinds of the driving Hamiltonian can be extended. By modifying its interpolating functions, the final kind of adiabatic algorithm can suit any fidelity of the systems to keep the adiabatic evolution always be valid. Finally, the time complexity of the extended algorithm is better than the original adiabatic algorithm, which owns a constant running time complexity. Although the time complexity is shifted to the complexity of implementing the driving Hamiltonian added.

Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems•Feb 27, 2018•1 citation

ON THE ADIABATIC QUANTUM EVOLUTION OF A SINGLE QUBIT

M. Andrecut, M. K. Ali

The adiabatic quantum evolution method has generally been studied for the case where the linear interpolation from an initial to a final Hamiltonian is taken. However, this approach fails even for the case of a single qubit, when the initial and final states are orthogonal or almost orthogonal. In this case, the evolution time becomes infinite. We show that by using a simple nonlinear interpolation method the adiabatic evolution can be done in finite time, regardless of the orthogonality of the initial and final states.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Dec 1, 2004•5 citations

How to make assisted driving Hamiltonian useful in quantum adiabatic computation?

Jie Sun, Songfeng Lu, Li Li

It is known that when the initial state has no overlap with the final state in an adiabatic computation, an extra assisted driving Hamiltonian has to be used to avoid the failure of quantum adiabatic algorithm. This assisted Hamiltonian has a relatively fixed form, which can be seen in the related literature but the mechanism behind it is still not clear enough. In this paper, we discuss the usefulness of a generalized form of assisted driving Hamiltonian in adiabatic evolution which may shed light on this problem.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Feb 1, 2019•0 citations
In this paper, we discuss the adiabatic evolution of one-dimensional projector Hamiltonians. Three kinds of adiabatic algorithms for this problem are shown, in which two of them provide a quadratic speedup over the other one. But when the ground state of the initial Hamiltonian and that of the final Hamiltonian have a zero overlap, the algorithms above all fail, in the sense of infinite time complexity. A corresponding revised method for this phenomenon through adding a driving Hamiltonian is also shown, from which a constant time complexity can be gained. But by a simple analysis, we find that the original time complexity for the adiabatic evolution is shifted to implement the driving Hamiltonian, which is supported by several early works in the literature.
In this paper, we study two different nonlinear interpolating paths in adiabatic evolution algorithms for solving a particular class of quantum search problems where both the initial and final Hamiltonian are one-dimensional projector Hamiltonians on the corresponding ground state. If the overlap between the initial state and final state of the quantum system is not equal to zero, both of these models can provide a constant time speedup over the usual adiabatic algorithms by increasing some another corresponding "complexity". But when the initial state has a zero overlap with the solution state in the problem, the second model leads to an infinite time complexity of the algorithm for whatever interpolating functions being applied while the first one can still provide a constant running time. However, inspired by a related reference, a variant of the first model can be constructed which also fails for the problem when the overlap is exactly equal to zero if we want to make up the "intrinsic" fault of the second model — an increase in energy. Two concrete theorems are given to serve as explanations why neither of these two models can improve the usual adiabatic evolution algorithms for the phenomenon above. These just tell us what should be noted when using certain nonlinear evolution paths in adiabatic quantum algorithms for some special kind of problems.
In this paper,we study two different nonlinear interpolating paths in adiabatic evolution algorithms for solving a particular class of quantum search problems where both the initial and final Hamiltonian are one-dimensional projector Hamiltonians on the corresponding ground state.If the overlap between the initial state and final state of the quantum system is not equal to zero,both of these models can provide a constant time speedup over the usual adiabatic algorithms by increasing some another corresponding complexity.But when the initial state has a zero overlap with the solution state in the problem,the second model leads to an infinite time complexity of the algorithm for whatever interpolating functions being applied while the first one can still provide a constant running time.However,inspired by a related reference,a variant of the first model can be constructed which also fails for the problem when the overlap is exactly equal to zero if we want to make up the intrinsic fault of the second model - an increase in energy.Two concrete theorems are given to serve as explanations why neither of these two models can improve the usual adiabatic evolution algorithms for the phenomenon above.These just tell us what should be noted when using certain nonlinear evolution paths in adiabatic quantum algorithms for some special kind of problems.
Adiabatic quantum computation is based on the adiabatic evolution of quantum systems. We analyze a particular class of quantum adiabatic evolutions where either the initial or final Hamiltonian is a one-dimensional projector Hamiltonian on the corresponding ground state. The minimum-energy gap, which governs the time required for a successful evolution, is shown to be proportional to the overlap of the ground states of the initial and final Hamiltonians. We show that such evolutions exhibit a rapid crossover as the ground state changes abruptly near the transition point where the energy gap is minimum. Furthermore, a faster evolution can be obtained by performing a partial adiabatic evolution within a narrow interval around the transition point. These results generalize and quantify earlier works.
It has been known that when an assisted driving item is added to the Hamiltonian of the main system, the efficiency of the resultant adiabatic evolution can be significantly improved. In some special cases, it can be seen that, only by adding an assisted driving Hamiltonian can the resultant adiaba tic evolution work. So it seems that, the additional driving Hamiltonian plays an important role in adiabatic computing. In this paper, we show five kinds of possible forms of the driving Hamiltonian, and analyses the performance of the algorithms. We find that the former fourth kinds of driving Hamiltonian may still cause the adiabatic algorithm lose their efficiency when the overlap of the initial and final states equals some special value. More importantly, we find that only the final kinds of the driving Hamiltonian can be extended. By modifying its interpolating functions, the final kind of adiabatic algorithm can suit any fidelity of the systems to keep the adiabatic evolution always be valid. Finally, the time complexity of the extended algorithm is better than the original adiabatic algorithm, which owns a constant running time complexity. Although the time complexity is shifted to the complexity of implementing the driving Hamiltonian added.
The adiabatic quantum evolution method has generally been studied for the case where the linear interpolation from an initial to a final Hamiltonian is taken. However, this approach fails even for the case of a single qubit, when the initial and final states are orthogonal or almost orthogonal. In this case, the evolution time becomes infinite. We show that by using a simple nonlinear interpolation method the adiabatic evolution can be done in finite time, regardless of the orthogonality of the initial and final states.
It is known that when the initial state has no overlap with the final state in an adiabatic computation, an extra assisted driving Hamiltonian has to be used to avoid the failure of quantum adiabatic algorithm. This assisted Hamiltonian has a relatively fixed form, which can be seen in the related literature but the mechanism behind it is still not clear enough. In this paper, we discuss the usefulness of a generalized form of assisted driving Hamiltonian in adiabatic evolution which may shed light on this problem.